<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Ethical Dilemmas in Criminal Justice by Courtney Rose</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice</link>
      <description>A focus on ethical challenges in corrections, protection, and punishment</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-08-08 01:43:56 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-12-07 00:30:44 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Controversial Sentencing of Brock Turner</title>
         <author>courtneyrose0731</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice/wish/117766825</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2016/06/stanford-rape-case-judge/487415/" />
         <pubDate>2016-08-09 04:49:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice/wish/117766825</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Ethical Dilemmas in Turner&#39;s Sentence</title>
         <author>courtneyrose0731</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice/wish/117854813</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>One of present-day society's most notorious and controversial cases is that of <em>People of the State of California v. Brock Allen Turner</em>. In January of 2015, Turner was charged with two counts of felony sexual assault, two counts of rape, and one count of attempted rape. The rape charges were dropped, however, in March of 2016, Turner was found guilty of the other three charges.  <br><br>The controversy surrounding the case stems from Turner's sentencing, which occurred on June 2, 2016. The maximum sentence for the charges would have been 14 years in prison. Prosecutors proposed six years in prison and probation officers advocated for a modest county jail sentence. Ultimately, Judge Aaron Persky of the Santa Clara Superior Court sentenced Turner to six months in the Santa Clara County jail and then three years of probation. He was also required to register as a sex offender for the remainder of his life and to participate in a sex offender rehabilitation program. The nation showed outrage at this minimal sentence and blamed Persky's decision to execute such a light punishment on the fact that Turner is an upper class white male. The public has since called for the removal of Judge Persky from the bench.<br><br>The largest ethical dilemma in this example is whether or not Persky did take into account Turner's race, sex, and class. Using any of those factors as a consideration in punishment is completely unethical. The focus of the sentence should largely be on the scope of the crime committed, the impact it had on the victim, and the probability of the offender to break the law again, and should take into consideration the recommendations for both sides of the case.<br><br>Another ethical dilemma arises from the fact that the judge states he did take into consideration what the recommendations from the prosecutors and the probation officers were. Because the judge believed Turner when he stated that he had the victim's consent, the judge followed the probation officers' notions. He states he did take into account Turner's age, lack of prior convictions, and the fact that he believed that Turner's remorse was indicative of the fact that he would not be any further danger to society. If Persky truly believed that the sentence he chose was the best punishment for the crime, then sentencing Turner to anything else, regardless of how his decision would be viewed in the public's eye, would be unethical.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-08-10 03:09:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice/wish/117854813</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ethical Challenges in Corrections</title>
         <author>courtneyrose0731</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice/wish/117860777</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There are a variety of challenges within our nation's correctional system. A few of these challenges include determining how best to prevent recidivism, whether or not correctional organizations should be privatized, issues with prison labor, and the acts of correctional staff.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Recidivism occurs when a person who has already committed a crime and served time for it again commits crime. It is largely agreed upon that preventing recidivism is the point of the penal system, but there are disagreements as to how this should be achieved. Some people believe that pure and simple punishment should be the main focus, while others believe that rehabilitation would be the best way to prevent future crime.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>The dilemmas regarding the privatization of correctional organizations extend to both prisons and probation and parole services. People who are for privatization argue that private companies can run their programs more efficiently and cost-effectively than the government can. People who are against it argue that the government should be responsible for making the decisions regarding punishment, and that handing that responsibility to private companies is unethical. Another concern with those who oppose privatization is that companies would abuse the system and attempt to keep inmates in for longer periods of time in an effort to generate more income.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Prison labor is another ethical concern. On one hand, it does give inmates something positive to do with their time and can give them skills that will be valuable upon their reintroduction to society. However, this is another area where abuse of the system can occur, as businesses would be able to pay inmates less than the rest of the population. In addition, safety procedures in prisons are often very different than those in a union and can result in more accidents that occur in the prisons.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Finally, the corruption of prison guards and probation and parole officers is also an ethical challenge. People in these authority positions can abuse their roles by sexually harassing inmates and clients, taking bribes, and showing favoritism. All of these actions defeat the mission of justice and cannot be tolerated.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-08-10 05:33:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice/wish/117860777</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bibliography</title>
         <author>courtneyrose0731</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice/wish/117861275</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/123901782/4fe277ed0476a787523bd61ee4857e17ec17da22/b3f844739bc76776fd8087fb6693951f.docx" />
         <pubDate>2016-08-10 05:44:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice/wish/117861275</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>courtneyrose0731</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice/wish/117861510</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/123901782/342fad10e4ab2c746ceea23a4eeded8981dab983/e8eb340cb138760ad50eea78578df9ce.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-08-10 05:49:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/courtneyrose0731/Ethical_Dilemmas_In_Criminal_Justice/wish/117861510</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
