<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>How do emotional responses to discussions about racial privilege function as defense mechanisms in academic settings? by Laurel Fisher</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/lfisher25_2/7gvq58i6tp4ib7bo</link>
      <description>Post your response to the discussion topic by clicking the plus button below! </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-10-20 17:32:58 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-10-23 23:11:43 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>lfisher25_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lfisher25_2/7gvq58i6tp4ib7bo/wish/3641451990</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Showing anger, denial or hostility in response to privilege discussions can intimidate marginalized voices. In the context of my job, it would also reinforce existing power structures by making the space <strong>emotionally unsafe</strong> for honest dialogue about racial inequities. Making mistakes is part of growth. Ignoring our mistakes sustains racial inequality. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/Fixed_versus_growth_mindset.png" />
         <pubDate>2025-10-20 17:34:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lfisher25_2/7gvq58i6tp4ib7bo/wish/3641451990</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
