What aspects of the process were successful and what elements should be kept for next year? by

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 16:54:58 UTC

Communication and support from the PMO were highlighted as positive points.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 16:55:31 UTC

Having more than one cycle per year was seen as beneficial, allowing for fewer ideas to be analyzed at a time and each one to be discussed in more depth.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 16:55:57 UTC

Interactions between different functions helped clarify the scope of the projects.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 16:56:15 UTC

Governance and communication were almost fully adjusted, except for global categories.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 16:56:32 UTC

Pipeline strategy workshops in each cluster before the ideation phase to gather insights on product gaps and needs.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 16:57:03 UTC

Collaborative work across areas, flexibility and adaptability to changes, creativity and collaboration in seeking resources for new ideas.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 16:57:35 UTC

Tools like Planner were helpful.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 16:58:00 UTC

Agility during decision-making instances and governance were strong points.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 17:00:02 UTC

Very collaborative team.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 17:00:15 UTC

More quantitative rationales for rankings and technical evaluations.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 17:00:37 UTC

Ideation for fungicides with workshops led by MKT and first prioritization of ideas at this moment.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 17:00:47 UTC

The phases of the process are clear and should be maintained.

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 17:00:57 UTC

Pilots for project management in a more agile way, seeking to anticipate launches and alternatives more flexibly

isabellalimaoliveira — 2024-12-13 17:01:13 UTC

Reduction in the number of files to be completed.