First, many of the new regional institutions have been created or led by emerging economies, such as China's Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank or the New Development Bank of the BRICS group.They hope that more countries can participate in international affairs and enjoy equal treatment.But intergovernmental organizations need not mean a destructive split.They can develop strategies that ensure compatibility with the core principles of global institutions and encourage constructive development of global governance.

IGOs is the organization made up and funded by multi countries which is authoritative and powerful. They can directly influent the decision and choice of region by giving international pressure while NGOs cannot. NGOs is formed by massive volunteers which is free from government control and work for the welfare of societies as non-profit governmental bodies. Therefore, they could only improve the global context they focused by social media, materials and financial offering and conversation with states or IGOs. For example, Red Cross Society always focus on helping people suffering from disasters, diseases, and poverty which is always in the news. It provides massive goods and money for these people to improve their life condition. Also, it asks medias to report the situation and demand to the world to seek for more help from the people. Because the pressure of medias and people, states have to reply to the problems posed by Red Cross and finally solve questions furtherly. It is the way NGOs deal with the problems and the way they influence the sovereignty. 

And the governance power of NGOs does not come from national sovereignty. For example, some transnational corporations, as the main form of for-profit NGOs, are both the participants of governance in globalization and the objects of governance.

In today's globalized world, global governance is in vogue. The direction of international organizations, non-governmental organizations, and States is not entirely consistent. International organizations have strong behaviors in some areas, while NGOs have a considerable voice in other areas. This is both contradictory and reasonable, depending on the balance of power.

Unlike international organizations, NGOs often take a different position from their own government on many issue, in the process of globalization, some non-profit NGOs can not only provide valuable advice and opinions to the United Nations, influence its decision-making, but also enhance the representativeness and democracy of the United Nations. For example, some governments may make decisions for the overall interests of their own country at the expense of the interests of some groups, which will be opposed many non-governmental organizations. the recent decision by Japan to dump nuclear wastewater in the Pacific Ocean, is the decision by the government to ensure its own overall interests, and this move has been opposed by many NGOs around the world.

Both NGO and IGO have an influential impact on state sovereignty.IGO makes and enforces policy.However,NGO doesn't make and enforce policy,which makes them play a diverse role in state sovereignty.

In terms of IGO, it has both positive and negative impacts on state sovereignty. In the views of positive Globalists,as for developed states which involved in IGO groups,such as US, their state sovereignty would be promoted, and their influence would be widen in this way.When it comes to NGO,some organizations are good to state sovereignty.However, in the views of negative Globalists,for those countries which are not very powerful，such as The Somalia Democratic Republictheir,state sovereignties may be declined through being controlled by powerful states of IGO.Meanwhile,some organizations involved in economic activities,may widen the gap between the rich and poor to decline the state sovereignty.

In the views of Internationalists,IGO can't replace the soverergnty of the states.For example,although the Asia-Pacific organization is an alliance,it is actually in charge of each other.
When it comes to NGO,some organizations have nothing to do with state sovereignty,such as Greenpeace.
In the views of  Transformationalists,it stands on the midway.State soveignty will not be improved or declined.The state sovereignty would be remained but transformed into a new form to interactive