My funky padlet by David Boronkay

korematsu v. united states:1942

dboronkay — 2023-12-15 16:30:14 UTC

after the attack on pearl harbor,korematsu refused to relocate to japanese internment camps. korematsu felt that the japanese intendments violated his rights. he felt his due process from the 5th amendment was violated. the supreme court ruled that 5th amendment right to due process is overweight by the united states being at war. this case negatively impacted the founding ideal, rights. even at a time of war, people should not have there rights violated

Ingraham v. Wright:1977

dboronkay — 2023-12-15 16:44:51 UTC

After Ingraham didn't move fast enough the teacher sent him down to the administration's office. When Ingraham refused to be patted down he got hit with a wooden paddle. Ingraham went to court because he thought that this broke his Eighth Amendment of no cruel and unusual punishment. the court ruled in favor of the school saying the Eighth Amendment doesn't stop punishment in schools.

Gregg v. georgia:1976

dboronkay — 2023-12-18 16:15:04 UTC

Gregg was convicted of 2 murders but he felt that the death penalty was unconstitutional. Gregg thought that the death penalty violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state the reason being it was constitutional and was not cruel and unusual. This negatively affects the founding ideals because people shouldn't die for things that they did

Furman v. Georgia:1972

dboronkay — 2023-12-18 16:16:42 UTC

Furman was given the death penalty but he went to court because he thought that the death penalty was unconstitutional. Furman felt that the death penalty violated the Eighth Amendment and was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Furman and ruled that the death penalty was unconditional under the Eighth Amendment. This negatively affects the founding ideals because people shouldn't die for things that they did

Mapp v. Ohio:1961

dboronkay — 2023-12-18 16:43:21 UTC

Mapp was arrested because police searched her house without a search warrant. Mapp went to court because she thought that the police were violating her 4th amendment right. The Supreme Court ruled 5-3 in Mapp's favor because the evidence was seized without a search warrant. this positively impacts the founding ideals because she got her right in the end

Tinker v. Des Moines:1969

dboronkay — 2023-12-18 16:44:25 UTC

Tinker wanted to protest the war that was going on so she wore a black armband but the school made a policy saying protesting. Tinker felt that this violated her 1st amendment because her speech was being taken away. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of tinker saying that they can protest as long as it does not disrupt the learning. this positively affects our founding ideals because this shows liberty

Bethel School District v. Fraser:1987

dboronkay — 2023-12-18 16:45:13 UTC

Fraser was a student who made a speech that had numerous sexual references and got three days of suspension. Fraser felt that this violated his First Amendment so he went to court. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school saying that the lewd and vulgar speech violated the school policy and the school did not violate his rights. this positively impacted the founding rights because kids shouldn't be able to give bad speeches.

Mahanoy Area High School v. B.L:2021

dboronkay — 2023-12-18 16:46:07 UTC

B.L. was a high school student who tried out for varsity volleyball but failed to make the team. So out of school, she started cursing at the school on Snapchat so she got suspended. B.L. felt like this violated her First Amendment so she went to court. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of B.L. because it was off campus. I think that this positively affects our founding ideals because schools shouldn't have a say in what we say outside of school.

Gideon v. Wainwright:1963

dboronkay — 2023-12-19 16:33:42 UTC

gideon was charged with a felony and when he went to court he was too broke to afford an attorney and the court refused to give him one. gideon thought that this was violating his Sixth Amendment right so he went to court. The Supreme Court ruled with Gideon saying that people do have a right to a legal consular. this case positively affected equality because now people have the right to an legal conaler in court.

Snyder v. Phelps:2011

dboronkay — 2023-12-19 16:34:39 UTC

Brown v. Board of education:1954

dboronkay — 2023-12-19 16:35:40 UTC

brown thought that it was unfair that kids of color got worse education than white people. brown went to court because he thought that this was violating his 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court thought that having different schools based on race was unconstitutional. I think that this positively affects the founding ideals because people should always have equal rights.

Vernonia v. Acton:1995

dboronkay — 2023-12-19 22:58:59 UTC

people at Vernonia school were using drugs so the school made a policy that said they could drug test anybody whenever they wanted. Acton refused to take the drug test because he thought that it was breaking his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Supreme Court ruled with the school saying that random drug tests do not violate the Fourth Amendment. this positively affects our founding ideals because none of the rights were violated.

New Jersey v. TLO:1984

dboronkay — 2023-12-19 23:10:08 UTC

TLO was smoking in the bathroom with another student and when a teacher found them she brought them to the principal's office when TLO refused to admit she was smoking the principal searched her bag and found drugs and marijuana. TLO felt like this violated her Fourth Amendment. the court said that she was guilty but school officials aren't allowed to search someone's bag without probable cause. this negatively affects the founding ideals because it violates one of her rights.

Miranda v. Arizona:1966

dboronkay — 2023-12-19 23:13:33 UTC

Miranda was a Mexican immigrant and was convicted of kidnapping and raping a woman so he got interrogated but the police forgot to tell him that he had the right to remain silent. Miranda felt like this violated his Fifth Amendment rights so he went to court. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Miranda saying that he had a right to his Fifth Amendment right. I think that this negatively affected the founding ideals because this does not show equality everybody should know their rights.

Hazelwood school district v. Kuhlmeier:1987

dboronkay — 2023-12-19 23:34:02 UTC

Kuhlmeier was in the school newspaper club and when the principal saw the paper he thought it was inappropriate and asked for those parts to be removed but they didn't so they got suspended. Kuhlmeier thought this violated her First Amendment rights so she sued the school. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school saying that the school doesn't go with the school's education. this positively affects the founding ideals because it is the school's right to let people have a newspaper club.