Grand Final Adjudication by BRACKEN, David (dmbra1) https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u Topic: That professional sportspeople in Australia should have a "good behaviour clause" included in their contracts. en-us 2022-11-25 01:39:37 UTC 2022-11-25 05:19:46 UTC hello@padlet.com First speaker (AFF) https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397528190 Heavily reliant upon palm cards, mostly reading with little eye contact. Good volume; confidence demonstrated.
Clear communication of proposed parameters. Appeals to pathos re: immoral behaviour. Statistics cited. Lengthy in getting to second point and speaking quickly to try finish.]]> 2022-11-25 04:41:08 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397528190 First speaker - dmbra1 https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397528823 repetitive. Second point irrelevant (Australian laws DO apply to sports people)]]> 2022-11-25 04:42:02 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397528823 1st speaker dmbra1 https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397530785 "Counter model" is simply a more permissive version of the status quo (sporting clubs DO stand sportspeople down in the case of criminal activities). 

Possible lack of research...]]> 2022-11-25 04:44:31 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397530785 First speaker (NEG) https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397534825 Offered alternative model. Also heavily reliant on palm cards and little eye contact.
'Good behaviour' stated as difficult to agree upon (faulty logic). Rejects the idea since one P.O.V. will inevitably become the standard without allowing for difference (this is how laws and legislation already work).
Suggest that this clause impinges upon privacy and freedom (seems quite a stretch). ]]> 2022-11-25 04:50:17 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397534825 First speaker dmbra1 https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397536565 Not engaging with the aff definitions / model – criminal activity etc.. have been defined by aff...]]> 2022-11-25 04:52:35 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397536565 First speaker- https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397538017 second point was more or less the same as the first]]> 2022-11-25 04:54:31 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397538017 Model https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397538599 Very detailed, difficult to argue against- too long spent on this?]]> 2022-11-25 04:55:15 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397538599 First speaker https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397539027 Weak arguments. I'm not sure that it is impractical to implement a good behaviour clause- I think aff clearly outlined what would be included and this was rebutted well by aff.]]> 2022-11-25 04:55:48 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397539027 Second speaker https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397540623 Good use of model for rebuttal. I like the point about protection for sponsors and employers.]]> 2022-11-25 04:57:21 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397540623 Second speaker (AFF) https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397540880 Good volume, use of gestures. Rebuttal attempts to engage with audience more via eye contact.
Citing influence sportspeople hold over youth and wider community. Israel Folaou example given quite strong. ]]> 2022-11-25 04:57:40 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397540880 Second speaker https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397542377 I agree, but hasn't the influence sportspeople have already been discussed at first?]]> 2022-11-25 04:59:19 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397542377 Second speaker (NEG) https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397544829 Good volume. Purely reading.
Other celebs cited, yet public personas still face (if limited) consequence already, e.g. production companies dropping the talent or breaking contracts (such as Kanye and Adidas).
Flawed argument: 'who can be perfect?' Not needing to be perfect, just contractually obliged to avoid select behaviours.]]> 2022-11-25 05:02:30 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397544829 Model https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397558250 Are neg saying that aff wants to punish twice, and that this is unfair?]]> 2022-11-25 05:19:46 UTC https://padlet.com/dmbra1/788hn448730piu9u/wish/2397558250