<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Whole class For/Against activity (using ideas from the sources only) by Rob</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg</link>
      <description>Task: There are two columns below, one is FOR (ideas that support the claim) and one is AGAINST (ideas that do not support the claim and may suggest other reasons). As a class you should classify all the ideas in the source abstract into these columns. . Remember to keep the whole essay question in your mind when you do this (re-read the essay question before you begin..</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-06-11 12:02:54 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-10-10 04:59:55 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>FOR</title>
         <author>rob_duncan1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg/wish/291136049</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Write ideas/evidence that support the claim in the essay question below, with citation</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-10 09:19:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg/wish/291136049</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>AGAINST</title>
         <author>rob_duncan1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg/wish/291136156</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Write ideas/evidence that can be used to suggest the claim in the essay question is too strong or even incorrect below, with citation</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-10 09:19:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg/wish/291136156</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dilin Liu</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg/wish/291170459</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The claim that plagiarism is acceptable in china ‘is dubious because it is built primarily on inaccurate or partially inaccurate information provided mostly by ESOL students who were found plagiarizing’</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-10 11:21:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg/wish/291170459</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Critical comment about Kayaoglu: </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg/wish/291175308</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I believe that the reasons that this author exposes, are more accurate in the moment of justifying the academic fraud. Students must adjust their academic methodology in respect with their new environment. It is impossible to be checked by a subjective manner.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-10 11:38:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg/wish/291175308</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Comment</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg/wish/291176793</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>What is considered a dubious source? In this article Dilin is claiming that Swoden's article is dubious but he is also proving the same point that plagiarism is acceptable in China.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-10 11:43:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rob_duncan1/73oqx4nfu4lg/wish/291176793</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
