FEEDBACK:

• Yêu cầu đề (gồm trả lời câu hỏi đầy đủ với giải thích, dẫn chứng thuyết phục, quan điểm rõ ràng) : mở bài cần nêu rõ quan điểm hơn và kết bài cần tóm tắt ý đã nói trong body và nêu lại quan điểm, cách thể hiện 2 đoạn đó chưa hay (7), cần thêm dẫn chứng thuyết phục

• Tính logic, mạch lạc, liên kết ý: 8

• Từ vựng: 7

• Ngữ pháp: 8

In this day and age, most means of communication concentrate too heavily on reporting news related to public figures. However, some people believe that the media should shift their attention to the common folk. From my perspective, I partly agree with this view.

First of all, what convinces me most is that in this era of rapid technological development, media organizations show their dominance on almost social network. They exert a large influence on people, especially youngsters, because their exposure to the Internet is getting more frequent. And with this, if the media focuses on lives of regular citizens, the social issues that need to be heard will efficiently be widespread-affecting to people's awareness. Lots of researches show that transmitting broadcast information, especially the problems that affect disadvantageously to people's benefits, to the masses is far more better than other medias such as newspaper or radio. Simultaneously, reporting the lives of ordinary people gives us a realistic way of looking at things. For further explanation, we are always willing to express our sympathy with people who are homeless or impaired, and also criticize bad behaviours of anyone.

In contrast, while the help of reporting ordinary people is undeniable, it still contains drawbacks. Some recent researches pointed out that the more unique information the articles contain, the more viewership the news will have so it requires entertainers to record extremely attractive problems. Since celebrities accustomed to contact with the public while every individuals are totally, it is difficult for media to collect interesting stories from regular citizens to attract readership. Moreover, every individuals have a certain desire to maintain their own privacy and donot want to share it to media so it leads to many secured problems for entertainers. Although posting about ordinary people will highlight diverse daily perspectives and experiences, it is not totally an effective way for media to gain more benefits such as fame and incomes from the publics.

In conclusion I believe that it is essential for the media to dedicate more resources to both well-known individuals and everyday individuals. So that, the celebrities can have a more comfortable life and the information of the common folk can be seen, which is also incredibly useful.

• Yêu cầu đề (gồm trả lời câu hỏi đầy đủ với giải thích, dẫn chứng thuyết phục, quan điểm rõ ràng) : ý có chỗ chưa dc mở rộng (7)

• + Tính logic, mạch lạc, liên kết ý: có ý chưa được liên kết tốt (7)

• +Từ vựng: 7

• Ngữ pháp: 7

There has been a widespread believe that in lieu of focusing on notable personalities, the media should prioritize covering the lives of regular citizens. Although the latter opinion seems to bring about positive impacts, I side with the view that ordinary people are not the suitable ones for the media to regularly report stories about, and they had better keep concentrating on media personalities.

First of all, what convinces me most is that finding compelling content featuring average people to attract audiences can be challenging in many ways. People who are not attached to great renown often avoid exposing their lives to the media like influencers do, which can help them get away with excessive fame. Therefore, the press may have difficulty researching information when ordinary individuals keep maintaining their privacy. It is not to mention that, people can even start legal proceedings against the media company in case their private lives are being recorded without permission. The media may also get into difficult situation because stories about ordinary people are not always interesting enough to live up to viewership’s interests.

On the other hand, there is a need for the media to dedicate a larger portion of their coverage to portraying well-known individuals. Because of possessing charismatic stature that appeals to the public, some famous people have been regarded as global figures in popular culture, making them the center of attention. In other words, the media tend to shift their attention towards reporting on public figures because they are whom everyone is most interested in. Not only does this promote viewership and readership, but it also brings about profitability and commercial interests. Additionally, celebrities also demand to collaborate with the media in the long term to maintain a positive public image.

In conclusion, although the media is believed to emphasize ordinary people’s lives, this has not been an easy work for reporters, and I reckon they invest greater effort in featuring the well-known for long-term benefits.

It is mostly believed that the press, in general, have concentrated too heavily on the public figures drama rather than shifting their attention towards the common folk in society. From my point of view, I partly concur with the idea for several reasons.

Firstly, gathering information on the well-known individual could effectively attract every customer. In fact, they may have been inspired by their stories, fame; then started to have a desirable dream of becoming success one day. Therefore, the media will achieve the massive increasing amount of viewership as well as readership. Furthermore, thanks to the potential opportunities of gaining profitability and commercial interests from focusing mainly on the public figures, both national and international media will not give up exploiting their resources. However, everything has two coins of the matter, and this issue is not an exception. Some people have argued that focusing excessively on the notable personalities may result in the privacy invasion and negative effects on mental health, as well as the creation of virtual standards for ordinary people, which are seriously harmful to every person’s casual habits. =>

Meanwhile, concentrating on regular citizen might become a substantially new breeze to the industrial newspaper press, due to the fact that it provides potential challenges in finding compelling stories about the folk, as if successfully done, the act of catching attention will be satisfied. Moreover, it obviously highly addresses the vital social issues and obstacles as well as highlighting diverse perspectives and experiences. Most importantly, it promotes the empathy and understanding between each person, which has unfortunately been faded away recently. Therefore, it instills people to stay in touch with others and create a large net of connection. => thêm 1 ví dụ thực tế vào là hay

On the other hand, looking at the issue from other aspect, I also concern that the well-known may take it as a huge sacrifice and conquer it to dedicate a larger portion of their coverage on influencing of their culture on the social community. For instance, recently, Phuong My Chi – one of the potentially talented and admirable singer – had stuck on some controversial drama relating to sexual activities, according to some of the tabloid. Despite the opposition of the public, she surprisingly managed to prove it from and reverse her disadvantageous status, leading to fame distribution of her successfully developed career as well as the veneration from the fans. There is no denial that Phuong My Chi has used this difficulty as a pedal for boosting her prestige and credibility in the public eyes.

=> lạc đề

In summary, I believe that while it is clearly seen that media may contribute to the damage of every notable personality’s personal life, they can use this challenge as a potential and precious opportunity to raise their fame up and enhancing personal income. Meanwhile, the action of searching for regular citizens’ content can benefit both the media and society in the aforementioned ways.

Feedback: band 6,5 , should have added specific examples to have higher band

There is a belief that it is essential for the media to shift their attention towards reporting on ordinary people's live. However, many people think news about well-known individuals are better to be focused on. In my opinion, I partially agree with this idea and this following essay will explain my reasons.

First of all, what convinces me most is that dedicating more resources to public figures will bring advantages to the media’s view. As celebrities are globally concerned, sharing interesting daily stories or news about them gives rise to viewership and readership. Beyond any doubt, hot topics about famous people help to bring commercial interests for social media. Besides, another justification is that overemphasizing on these notable personalities can create unrealistic standards for the ordinary, which also has an adverse impact on the society. For instance, adolescents may feel peer pressure when watching a hot tiktoker, who is at the same age, earning money and having ability to buy her own house.

On the other hand, I believe it is beneficial to allocate additional coverage to regular citizens in some ways. Although compelling stories of these individuals are hard to find, as well as attracting much public’s attention, these sharing will promote empathy and kindness among people. Moreover, government can know more about social problems that residents are facing, so they might come up with suitable solutions. To exemplify, news about bad drainage sytems in a particular area can not only help residents to be more aware, but also make the government invest more effort in tackling the issue.

In conclusion, I believe the mass media should pay balanced concertration on both of the celebrities and ordinary people’s live so as to provide a diverse range of experiences and perspectives.

The essay provides examples and justifications to support this viewpoint.

In today’s world, to increase the amount of viewership, social media has concentrated too heavily on public figures and ignored the daily life of humans. There are a few discussions about investing greater effort in the common folk. Despite it would be suitable in some cases, I still vehemently disagree with that remark. Young people especially can be inspired to emulate great people by learning about the life of celebrities and catching the latest trend to develop themselves in society.

The first important thing to remember is that most celebrities are successful people in their market. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that their lives are great examples for others to follow and see the positive qualities in them. For instance, Bill Gates is a well-known businessman, who is known as the inventor with a significant application - Microsoft. Many teenagers have been motivated to study and work even harder to approve of success. Also, we can try our best based on their advice, experience new things which presenting by famous people.

In addition, another justification for this matter is that we barely learn new thing from the stories of regular citizens since their are potential challenges in finding  attractiveness from their lives. It is common knowledge that the majority of news about life of humans focus on crime, education, or daily problems in their hometown which are recognizable and repetitive to readership. Many statistics have showed that news programmes gradually lose their viewers as their disinteresting information.

In conclusion, I believe that valuable lessons are brought up more in learning about the lives of celebrities than they are in the lives of common people. Along with these unique models, we can learn from their failures and achievements.

It has been a trend for the media to concentrate excessively on personal information of well-known individuals such as actors and singers. however, some people believe that it is essential for the media to shift their attention towards reporting on the lives and contributions of common folk. from my perspective, despite the considerable influence celebrities have on the society, i am strongly opposed to focusing and reporting too much information about public figures’ lives.

First of all, what convinces me most is that even though it has more difficulties finding interes in stories to give prominence to readership, it can help addressing important social issues and challenges that it is facing. As a matter of fact, when media allocates to ordinary people moderately, bringing personal life up to social platform can promote empathy and understanding in society. Simultaneously, highlighting diverse perspectives and experiences.

On the other hand , looking at the issue from the other aspect , I also believe that the media should focus moderately on the personal lives and relationships of celebrities. Those who object to the former group often argue that it's not necessary to pay attention on public figures. As we can see, in some photos or videos which are posted on the social network, the appearance of well-known individuals helps increase viewership and readership. Their good-looking faces, their elegance and outgoing personality are one of the most valuable things to attract other people. Therefore, they can bring commercial interests to a few companies throughout advertising. For instance, famous brands often invite celebrities to publicize their products, which is a good way to gain attention from consumers. Furthermore, public figures also have considerable influences on the society such as creating idealistic standards for normal people or being a role model for the youth. For example, their personal stories that are shared on social network can inspire regular citizens. However, some news writing about them sometimes distract from other important ones.

To put it simply, I think it should be the responsibility of the media to present fair news that involves the lives of both celebrities and ordinary individuals. The balance in supplying information will bring many benefits to the media but ensuring each’s privacy is secured.

Các đoạn nhỏ body gom lại thành 1 body lớn vì ý chính về ordinary people => 3 đoạn chính trong bài essay này

Overall, this is a well-written essay that effectively addresses the prompt.To further enhance the essay, providing additional evidence or examples for the counterargument

In today's media there is a noticeable tendency to focus excessively on the lives and relationships of famous people such as actors, singers, and football players. Some people argue that the media should instead spend more time reporting on the lives of ordinary people.

The argument in favor of prioritizing coverage of ordinary people stems from the belief that they represent the majority of society and that their stories are more understandable to ordinary viewers. Ordinary people face challenges and victories every day that resonate with a wider audience, making their experiences more relevant and meaningful. Furthermore, paying too much attention to famous people can contribute to a distorted perception of reality and promote unrealistic standards of success and happiness. By shifting the focus to ordinary people, the news media can provide a more balanced image of society and highlight the diversity of human experience.However, it is important to consider the commercial aspects of media reporting. Celebrities often attract large audiences and generate significant revenue for media agencies through advertising and sponsorship. While reporting on ordinary people can produce compelling human interest stories, it does not always generate equal viewership and revenue.

In short, while there is value in advocating for increased coverage of ordinary people in the media, it is essential to acknowledge the financial considerations that influence media content. Finding a balance between reporting on celebrities and ordinary individuals is necessary to provide a diverse range of perspectives and maintain the financial viability of media organizations.

Support with 1 specific example might have boosted higher score.

It's a common belief that the media ought to concentrate on citizen's lives. However, I firmly believe that they need to balance their efforts reporting news related to well-known individual and the population.

First of all, what convinces me the most is influencers' stories can be reported by news agency. Given the celebrities have the ability to attract public attention, the media should utilize that fame in order to accumulate finacial, social benefits. For instance, dramas about notable personalities can trigger curiosty in common folk, which substantially boost the viewership for the media sites. Another example is that celebrities have a tremendous influence on fashion, from which people can be inspired and accumulate into their lives. => ví dụ chưa dc giải thích rõ ràng cho luận điểm lợi ích của međia

On the other hand, I belive that the media should be concerned about lives and stories of the regular citizens around them. Despite of difficult challenges in finding compelling articles to attract much attention of readership, it might become a potential news supply for newspaper press. Moreover, it can help to raise empathy and kindness among individuals, which means the more information the media give about the hardship and difficulty of the needy, the more community will be well-informed and try to work out ways to assist them. A predominant example can be widely observed is that recently, young generation is making a great deal of effort to disseminate numerous underprivileged circumstances so that others can aid them with the necessity for their daily lives.

Base on mentioned ideas, it seems to me that the news of celebrities and casuals should be balance in frequency appears. Besides the entertaining news from influencers, news from ordinary people brings us awareness and experiences.

Quá nhiều ý cho body cho nên bài rất dễ bị mất trọng tâm và độ mạch lạc cho thi IELTS - viết vừa phài nhưng trọng tâm và màn tính thuyết phục với phát triển ý và ví dụ chứng minh.

It is sometimes believed that there is a need for the media to dedicate a larger portion of their coverage to portraying the lives of common individuals instead of concentrating too heavily on the lives and relationships of well-known ones. While I understand why some people may oppose this opinion, I still wholeheartedly agree with it for several reasons.

Opponents of this view may point to celebrities’ influence and commercial interests. Firstly, they may well argue that famous inviduals often have the huge number of fans usually having a soft spot for what involves their idols, particularly nationality and other cutural ones, which is likely to make publish figures’ fans gain in-depth knowledge into those well-known persons’ culture. This can lead to the fact that notable personalities may play an important role in developing their indigenous culture on society, so the media should dedicate more resources to these persons.

The second argument is that when reporting the lives of famous people, the media usually distract more viewers to notable inviduals’ news, achieving greater profitability of the media and catching audiences’ interests. If such commercial interests, however, are more and more numerous, resulting in viewers’ boredom or distraction from some necessary news.

Nevertheless, I still agree that the media should allocate additional coverage to regular citizens because of addressing important issues they have an obligation to experience and promoting empathy in society. Regarding the former, thanks to articles’ prioritizing covering the details of unknown people, the publish can know which challenges struggling artists face in their lives and how to assist them. This can be exemplified by the Central part of Vietnam where due to the contantly updated news about the flood, people around the country might donate money, food and such other necessaries, which often provide flood victims with the opportunity to overcome the problem.

Another worth-mentioning reason is that the more individuals who have their heartrending stories are reported in articles, the more peple feel empathic towards those stories. The main reason for this is that when the media dedicate a larger portion of such disadvantaged folk’s stories to portaying, more and more citizens may know those stories and feel empathic to these persons, promoting empathy in society.

In conclusion, it is understandable why som may not support the idea of the lives of ordinary people invested greater effort in by the media. In contrast, I still strongly agree with this suggestion given the aforemetioned reasons.

The essay is well-organized, with each paragraph focusing on a different aspect of the topic. The ideas are relevant and supported with examples, showing a good level of development.

Nowadays, the media pay much attention to well-known people to increase view. Therefore, having a statement assume that the orinary people should be paid more attention. In my interview, that state has both of true and fail sides.

Media is super important in everyone's life, especially for young people. Lots of teens watch TV for fun, like movies and reality shows, instead of the news. This is probably because celebrity lives seem so glamorous these days, and they set trends. The problem is, young people often try to copy their idols' lifestyles, which can be a bad influence if they're not careful. For example, they might think it's okay to wear really short dresses or get drunk all the time. That's why it's important for the media to show more positive stories about regular people, not just celebrities.

In our fast-paced world, where most news is consumed on mobile devices in quick bursts, telling stories about regular people is key for media outlets. People often access news on their phones for just a few minutes, so media needs to choose what they report very carefully. Catchy headlines can grab attention and make people curious enough to click and learn more. Instead of just focusing on getting clicks, comments, or making money, media should aim to provide real value to their audience. This means going beyond just short-term engagement and building a connection with their readers.

To sum up, it is better for media to report the life of good people, which become as a role model for people around the world than follow and announce what happen in celebrities life. Sometimes it can be bad impact for young generation in the future.

• The ideas are relevant and supported .but there are some errors in word choice and word formation. There are also occasional errors in grammar.

Numerous of social media, nowadays, are tend to focus on the celebrities' life which attention should be spent on collecting the casual people stories. In my perspective, ordinary story species are necessarily supportive to the communities, however, both media businesses and citizens also be benefited by the concentrating on celebrities.

To begin with, the citizens will be provided necessary information, which maintains their awareness about dangers. According to the news, the sources of dangers can be identified which help them to allocate the dangerous place in order to keep a safe distances as well as their friends and families. Moreover, news written by social media businesses are more reliable and complete, so it also helps saving time, especially for an instant news. For example, people can locate the robbery activities' areas from daily early morning and warn their families.

By contrast, celebrities' news brings in many benefits for both individuals and businesses. Firstly, the profit from viewers is the main income of most of the media companies, moreover, the famous people' informations are more attractive than the casual ones. Because of the stabled amount of fans of the celebrities, the viewers will also be stabled which promises a predictable profit and show a different profit in comparison to casual story. Secondly, those news are a entertain programmes for most of casual people while spending time online. That is because those news can raise people' curiousity as well as seeing them daily also have become many people' habits. For instance, both young and old people, nowadays, are addicted to ssmartphone and social media with high entertainmental content.

In conclusion, although ordinary news are beneficial for the citizens' safety, however, it also brings in huge profit for businesses as well as daily entertains people.

The ideas are relevant and extended, with some examples provided to support the arguments. However, there are areas for improvement in terms of coherence and cohesion, as well as grammatical range and accuracy.

The social media platforms have long been considered as one of the most popular entertainment means. Therefore, many internet users say that the media have to invest greater effort in well-known individuals while there is another persuasive opinion that the media dedicate larger resources to ordinary people. In this following essay, both merits and demerits of two sides will be analyzed.

First of all, what convinces me most is that the media should prioritize covering the lives of renowned individuals. To clarify, this might help boost the viewership and readership for those celebrities’ companies in order to gain high profits and commercial values. For instance, it is reported that Ms Le Thai Ngoc Diem Huyen Trinh, who was witnessed dating with a spider in a restaurant before, has more and more increasing followers on her tiktok, twitter account. Secondly, it also generate appropriate standards for citizens. In other words, due to their influential fame, ordinary people can base on that to become superior as the celebrities are. Take Ms Olineoguli as an example, she has long perceive as one of the most popuplar influencers around the world according to “2023 RECAP” magazine. Nonetheless, there are also privacy invasion and negative effects on those celebrities’ mental health inspite of fame and money. Specifically, if they are excessively kept track of their personal lives, they can easily suffer from huge pressure. Therefore, it is firmly convinced that Cardi B who is a popular American rapper usually get bad comments about herself due to rudeness in public.

On the other side, most people hold a belief that the media ought to allocate additional coverage to common folk. Firstly, it is without dispute that concentrating on everyday individuals is difficult to find interesting stories to attract readership from the media’s view. To exemplify, people would rather read about animals than look up for daily life of local people partly because viewers show a massive concern about essential news or issues and not want to get distraction or unnecessary information. However, it gain several benefits from the society’s view. Finding out and adressing social problems that need to be heard can be listed as one the first priority. In other words, social activists and professors can base on those news in order to approach the citizens effortlessly. A recent survey conducted in Ho Chi Minh city shows that ordinary people feel so delighted as the polluted water around them is finally solved through newspapers, network,… Moreover, the government can promote empathy in society by reports on social media platforms, so benefactors can help the poor with money. This has led to a situation where regular citizens are able to be highlighted diverse perspectives and experiences. To list, the poverty rates in rural areas around India decrease gradually according to ABCXYZ@net economists as well as financial experts.

In summary, both two views have advantages and disadvantages. Personally, I mostly agree with both 2 views since the media should combine with the society in order to announce news rapidly and appropriately to viewers on the internet.