Debates on intervention by Nicholas Chan https://padlet.com/nicholas_chan/70w26xq89yg2 A live summary of what's being said. en-us 2019-03-29 11:39:07 UTC 2019-04-01 09:59:30 UTC hello@padlet.com Debates on intervention nicholas_chan https://padlet.com/nicholas_chan/70w26xq89yg2/wish/347038895 Two people from each side should track what their respective sides are saying. Click outside of the post for it to be posted, and change the colour (top right of the post) to a consistent background for your side.]]> 2019-04-01 06:51:17 UTC https://padlet.com/nicholas_chan/70w26xq89yg2/wish/347038895 YES to US intervention https://padlet.com/nicholas_chan/70w26xq89yg2/wish/347082595 1. varying degree of intervention
2. possibility of destabilising the region
3. people look at US for help
4. attacking civilians against the rule of law, US sees this as their responsibility to protect civilians
5. killing innocent people = bad
6. our record of questionable intervention should not stop us from doing the right thing now, it would be bad to not stop them killing 150000 civilians
7. Tyler wants to agree to no intervention
8. A certain form of intervention is required at this stage, may not be US, but someone has to intervene
]]> 2019-04-01 09:46:03 UTC https://padlet.com/nicholas_chan/70w26xq89yg2/wish/347082595 No to US intervention https://padlet.com/nicholas_chan/70w26xq89yg2/wish/347083045 - Intervention is not the solution, who gives them the right to behave on behalf of other governments?
- Illegal af based on international law
- This intervention would come with the condition of favorable oil policy
- We have international organisations to help establish and set up interventions if needed
- infringing on democratic values to impose on someone's sovereignty
- killing = bad - don't be Dick Cheney
- Based on America's track record, intervention would be more for self-interests than hoping to promote democracy ]]> 2019-04-01 09:47:39 UTC https://padlet.com/nicholas_chan/70w26xq89yg2/wish/347083045