Reflection by Melissa Mangunsong

Melissa

melsmangun — 2026-02-18 01:52:24 UTC

From reflection 1, what made it effective is.... Meanwhile from reflection 2, I learn that...
I think example ... is better, because...

Nara

2026-02-18 04:21:12 UTC

1. From reflection 1, the element that made it effective is the use of real-world evidence. The reflection references elderly people in Japan using AI for healthcare. Meanwhile, reflection 2 ties the reflection personally. Quotes like "I found it easy to criticize the carelessness of consumers" and "I failed to recognize that I was only looking at one side of the situation" prove that.

I think reflection 1 is a better reflection because it draws on other people's perspectives (Japanese elderly) to prevent bias on the writer's part.

Aurelia

2026-02-18 04:22:19 UTC

From reflection 1, what made it effective is that the writer clearly shows how their opinion changed through research and gives specific real-world examples (like AI in finance and medical diagnostics) to explain that shift. Meanwhile, from reflection 2 I learned that a strong reflection should show personal growth and acknowledge both sides of an issue, even if the writer still holds their original opinion in a more balanced way.

I think example one is better because it provides clearer evidence, a deeper explanation of how the writer's thinking changed, and it connects personal reflection with the broader real-world trends about AI.

emilie

2026-02-18 04:23:37 UTC

From reflection 1, what made it effective is that it clearly shows how the writers opinion changed after doing the research. The writer explains their original belief and then gives the specific examples that changed their thinking. this is important because it shows the deep research that this person did. meanwhile from reflection 2, i learn that it is important to look at both sides of the issue. The writer admits they were focusing too much on the negative side and realizes that there are also positive impacts.

I think Example 1 is better, because it gives more detailed explanations and stronger evidence. The writer uses clear examples to support how their opinion changed, and they connect their reflection to the real world. it feels deeper and is stronger

LOGAN

2026-02-18 04:24:18 UTC

From reflection 1, the thing that made it effective is that it used many examples of how AI can be useful. Such as complex financial analysis and AI performing medical diagnostics. Meanwhile, reflection 2 makes the reader empathize by adding a personal connection to the idea to show experience and where their perspective is coming from.
I think that reflection 1 is better because it uses actual evidence/real world examples instead of personal feelings and choices.

josepha

2026-02-18 04:27:51 UTC

1. Clearly states how the writer’s perspective changed after learning about AI.Shows deeper critical thinking by discussing both benefits and challenges of AI. From reflection 2 Honestly reflects on a shift in perspective about digitalization.

Connects the topic to personal experience (living in Indonesia).

2. I like example 1 more. It explains the topic more deeply and

uses clearer examples of AI applications.

Nivinka

2026-02-18 04:29:21 UTC

1. What made reflection 1 effective is that it clearly explained how the opinion changed, with examples such as AI in finance and healthcare. On the other hand, from reflection 2, I learned that it is better to include personal experience in a reflection to make it more authentic.

2. I believe example 2 is better because it is more personal. The writer relates the issue to their own experience, making the reflection more genuine. They also mention the negative and positive impacts of digitalization, which shows their thinking.

Joanne

2026-02-18 04:29:34 UTC

From reflection 1, what made it effective is that it clearly explains how the writer’s opinion changed over time and supports this with specific examples (like AI doing medical diagnostics and financial analysis). This shows critical thinking and real learning from research.

Meanwhile, from reflection 2, I learn that reflection is strong when the writer honestly admits their past bias and shows a balanced understanding after researching, including both positives and negatives. I think Example 1 is better, because it gives more detailed evidence, uses clearer reasoning, and shows deeper analysis of how the writer’s thinking evolved. It feels more analytical and specific, while Example 2 is more general and less detailed.

Abielle

2026-02-18 04:38:27 UTC

From reflection 1, what made it effective is that the writer clearly shows how their opinion changed after doing research and supports their new understanding with specific examples, such as AI being used in complex fields like finance and healthcare. Meanwhile, from reflection 2, I learn that a good reflection should include personal insight, self-awareness, and an understanding of both sides of an issue.

I think example 2 is better, because it shows deeper personal reflection. The writer recognizes their own bias and connects the issue to their real-life experience, which makes the reflection more meaningful and realistic.

Izzy

2026-02-18 04:43:26 UTC

Number 1 is effective as it clearly shows the change in opinions once research is clearly done, showing that they fully done research on both sides of the question. They further strengthen it by using specific examples of why they changed their mind
For number 2, they show their initial opinions and thes change in them after too. They also add personal experience making it more authentic. They also talk about both perspectives to show they did a balanced research.
I like example 1 more, as it provides specific situations in the world(Japan) and how it convinced them to change their perspective on the topic.

Seungwoo

2026-02-18 04:44:46 UTC

1. From Reflections 1 and 2, what makes them effective is that both writers clearly show a change in their thinking after researching. Reflection 1 is effective because it uses specific real-world examples and discusses both positive and negative impacts, while Reflection 2 is effective because it includes personal experience, admits bias, and shows a more balanced understanding. Both are thoughtful.

Example 2 is better because it feels more personal and reflective. The writer connects the topic to their own life, admits they were biased at first, and clearly explains how their perspective changed. This shows self-awareness and real learning, which makes the reflection more meaningful and authentic.

alexa

2026-02-18 04:45:02 UTC

1. From reflection 1 what made it effective is how the writer shows how their opinion changed over time by explaining what they believed before, what new evidence they found through research, and how that evidence challenged their original view. The reflection is detailed and includes specific examples, such as AI in finance, healthcare, and elder care, which makes the learning process feel realistic and thoughtful. Reflection 2 is good, clear and simple.

I think example 1 is better because it demonstrates deeper critical thinking and reflection. The writer not only explains their change in perspective but also discusses contradictions in their thinking and how different examples influenced them. This shows a stronger engagement with the topic and a more developed reflection process compared to example 2, which is clear but less detailed in showing how the writer’s thinking evolved.

Ryan

2026-02-18 04:45:08 UTC

Both reflections are effective because they clearly show how the writers’ perspectives changed after research. In Example 1, the writer explains how they originally believed AI would only replace simple jobs, but later realized it can also perform complex tasks like financial analysis and medical diagnostics. The use of real-world examples strengthens the reflection and shows deeper critical thinking. In Example 2, the writer effectively acknowledges their personal bias about digitalization and consumer behavior. By reflecting as an Indonesian citizen, the writer adds a strong personal connection and demonstrates balanced thinking by recognizing both positive and negative impacts.

Overall, Example 1 is slightly stronger because it combines personal growth with broader global implications and stronf evidence. It shows not only a shift in opinion but also deeper analysis of future consequences. While Example 2 is thoughtful and honest, Example 1 presents a more well supported reflection, making it more convincing and academically strong.

2026-02-18 04:45:31 UTC

Example 1 is effective because it clearly shows how the writer’s opinion about AI changed after doing research. It includes strong examples and explains both positive and negative impacts, showing deep thinking.

Example 2 is effective because it shows personal growth and honesty. The writer admits their past bias and explains how their understanding improved.

Example 1 is better because it gives more detailed explanation and stronger evidence.