https://padlet.com/baotram9241/6t2qzwv9yy1igsb0 Company A is an enterprise specializing in the field of fertilizers and materials. On July 27, 2020, A signed a contract to sell urea fertilizer to its partner, company B (Singapore). A invites company C in Hai Phong to carry out the inspection. Cargo ship received goods from Hai Phong port from August 20, 2020 to May 29, 2021. Company C issues an assessment certificate as follows: According to the assessment certificate of quantity dated August 29th, 2020. August 28, 2020 company C issues 109,400 bags of company A's goods on board, equivalent to 5,470 tons. Company A has paid domestic customers the equivalent of 5,470 tons According to the assessment certificate of water dish dated August 29, 2020 of company C, the quantity of goods loaded on ship D is 5,202 tons. Foreign customers pay the value of goods equivalent to 5,202 tons to Company A. Due to the difference between the inspection certificate between the quantity and the water, company A and company C agreed to seal the cargo hold.. Company A believes that due to the wrong assessment of Company C Hai Phong, Company A has suffered a loss in the quantity of goods: 5,470 tons - 5,202 tons = 268 tons of Urea fertilizer. The two sides have worked but have not been able to resolve the damage and compensation. Therefore, Company A filed a lawsuit to the People's Court of District N. According to the first-instance judgment of the People's Court of District N, it accepted the lawsuit filed by Company A and ordered the party C to pay compensation according to Article 266.2. a) According to this judgment, what is the fault company C caused ? b) Do you agree with the court's remedy? If not, how should this case be resolved? en-us 2022-04-27 08:09:45 UTC 2022-04-28 09:34:32 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f608.png baotram9241 https://padlet.com/baotram9241/6t2qzwv9yy1igsb0/wish/2160019442 Câu trả lời]]> 2022-04-27 08:43:21 UTC https://padlet.com/baotram9241/6t2qzwv9yy1igsb0/wish/2160019442