Language- engaging variety of vocabulary. Another important component is accuracy especially syntax and grammar. 12%

Body language- keeping an eye contact. Making gestures. Acting naturally. 18% 

Clarity- speaking at the right phase, not to slow or fast. Pronouncing the words correctly not omitting sounds and syllables.        22%        

 

Relevance- all the arguments, illustration and in general everything which is said during the debate has to be relevant to the motion otherwise the audience loose the connection.       23% 

 

All these criteria are crucial for understanding the debate. A debate has a saying and in order to convey it we must keeping sequences, the connection and making sure that what is said id clear.    

1.       Organized and clear presentation – This criterion is very important as the messages have to be conveyed clearly so that all listeners can follow and understand fully. 50%

2.       Compelling arguments based on proficiency of the discussed material – This criterion is very important as the speaker should provide illustrations and examples based on gathered data which eventually enables participants to refute and rebuttal opposing arguments when necessary. 50%

 Yaeli Davidov

The topic is relevant

 A topic that provide new insights for the audience

The ideas being expressed need to be organized in a logical way 

Points are clearly stated and supported by examples

Presentation: (50%)

Use of voice -Speak clearly

Control of language -The language used should be appropriate to the topic, the audience and the situation

Deportment- a neat appearance, eye contact with the audience 

       Elena Even-Simkin

If there is indeed an argument that is relevant 

If it is a logical argument

If the arguments have enough research behind them

Its a consistent argument

If   the speech is well written

Delivery of speech with clarity and correct Pronunciation

Ability to captivate the audience eye contact, 

Timing especially if using humour

Confidence 

Correct Language structure 

There is evidence that the teams have listened to the opposing side and that the arguments are dealt with accordingly.

The points are answered in a satisfactory manner.

There is respect between the team members and that each individual understands their role within the team.

The criteria that I am writing here is based on Debating Matters which is a UK debating competition.  The judging in this debate is a little more formal and at the end of the day the judges need to decide who has won the debate.  

Some of the items that the judges must relate to include such things as whether the speaker was able to address difficult questions. A speaker who cannot deal with difficult issues or does not address the main points is missing the whole point of the debate.  

In the opening presentations the judges need to consider whether the debaters are clearly presenting a well-structured case with evidence and whether they have a clear understanding of the opposition's position.  During questioning can they debaters think quickly under pressure and give clear answers and respond to the other side.

After looking at some rubrics on the subject I believe that the following points should be given:

Organization and clarity   30 pts      Use of argument   30 pts                Use of cross examination and rebuttal  30 pts
Presentation  10 pts