The documentary insists that humans have caused countless destruction of the Earth in many aspects starting at the age of industrialization. We are risking irreversible damage to our planet and the only way to stop it is if we completely halt the practices that are causing it.

The argument is a call to action that urges viewers to take responsibility and engage in action. It emphasizes the importance of sustainability, conservation, and policy changes. Also, the documentary appeals to pathos by using compelling visuals and a narrator to illustrate the scene causing it to pull at heartstrings. There is scientific credibility as many experts in fields surrounding environmental science are presented to show their side of the situation and what can be done to prevent it. Another strength is that the film is on a very popular, widespread content base therefore it'll be able to reach a large audience that can enforce the message. A flaw could be that the film pulls too much at pathos therefore exaggerating the effects and visuals of what occurs because of climate change and its outcomes.

“Breaking Boundaries.” Watch Breaking Boundaries: The Science Of Our Planet | Netflix Official Site, 4 June 2021, https://www.netflix.com/watch/81336476?trackId=255824129&tctx=0%2C0%2Ccabfd71e-8d2a-469a-86bf-b932e42ed1d1-751046675%2Ccabfd71e-8d2a-469a-86bf-b932e42ed1d1-751046675%7C2%2C%2C%2C%2C%2C%2CVideo%3A81336476%2CdetailsPagePlayButton. Accessed 4 Jan. 2024.

The documentary had me questioning the severity of deforestation at large. Becoming curious about the situation I searched "deforestation" and this article appealed to me because of the word "tragedy" since it signifies that it's a drastic conflict. Both relate to each other because Breaking Boundaries discusses how tropical forests like the Amazon are at their breaking point because of the reduction of trees though they absorb our carbon emissions which the issue is troubling if we want them to continue to absorb at a normal rate.

The intended audience is those who are concerned about the environmental conditions of our earth. The main argument is that deforestation is a critical issue that needs to be addressed by governments and industries along with its severe consequences of loss of biodiversity and negative impact on local ecosystems as many of the trees logged is making space for agricultural practices or raising cattle. Strengths are that it highlights the need for immediate change which can influence the viewers to reach out and try to cause change. Also, it uses credibility by using scientific evidence and experts to portray its stance. However, a flaw could be that it oversimplifies the issue not elaborating on the multiple factors and consequences of deforestation.

“The Tragedy Of Deforestation | Climate Change: The Facts | BBC Earth.” YouTube, YouTube, 11 Nov. 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5Fwl4P4EW8. Accessed 4 Jan. 2024.

Thinking of deforestation as a whole, I began to wonder how the Amazon rainforest was being affected by it. Knowing the rate of deforestation is not decreasing I was curious about what the consequences are concerning it as it's such a vast forest full of biodiversity.

The intended audience is those who are concerned about rainforest deforestation and it addresses the critical role the biome has for cooling our globe and reducing carbon emissions along with the plentiful biodiversity it has. To instill credibility the text uses Antonio Nobre; one of Brazil's leading climate scientists who is an expert on the Amazon. The warning of disaster instills a sense of emergency in the audience to fight for a change in our lumber industry and. a reduction in deforestation. Also, the video uses logos by stating countless statistics and facts to defend their argument. Some strengths are that the use of specific data creates an informative narrative along with the use of a credible source like a climate scientist forms trust between the viewers and them. Spreading awareness of such a relevant topic is necessary in a world full of environmental change. A flaw could be that it doesn't incorporate the other side's position nor elaborate as to why the others would disagree with their stance.

“Amazon Deforestation and Climate Change.” Education, education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/amazon-deforestation-and-climate-change/. Accessed 4 Jan. 2024.

Watching the video prior made me wonder why deforestation is still a large issue in Brazil about the Amazon forest. When I was searching why its still occurring I discovered this article about illegal logging. Finding out that 80-90% of logging of the forest is not done legally connected the dots for me about the reasoning there is a massive deconstruction of the rainforest.

The text appeals to the audience's interest by highlighting the urgent issue of logging and it focuses on the environmental consequences. The context emphasizes the importance of regulating and controlling logging practices in the Amazon. The central argument was that illegal practices initiated threats of diminishing biodiversity and tree-land coverage. Also, the text uses persuasive devices like statistics and factual evidence (logos) to emphasize the detrimental effect illegal logging has on the forest biome. The text also has a significant impact on raising awareness of the issue as many would not consider the severity of the situation if not exposed to the scientific data. However, instead of looking entirely at the negative impacts of logging it could also highlight the benefits of sustainable logging and why it should be more heavily reinforced.

“Logging in the Amazon.” WWF, wwf.panda.org/discover/knowledge_hub/where_we_work/amazon/amazon_threats/other_threats/logging_amazon/. Accessed 8 Jan. 2024.

Feeling as though I had finished my journey learning about deforestation and why it occurs I began to get curious about the ozone hole which was mentioned in my core text. I came across this video on Youtube and the channel was by NASA therefore I automatically felt like I could trust what the video said even before seeing it. The ozone layer and hole are related to climate change because increased CO2 emissions leads to a decrease in ozone concentrations in tropical areas.

The audience is likely those who are concerned about our atmosphere. It utilizes scientific facts about the ozone layer, UV radiation, and the impact of ozone depletion. Being aware of where the video is being created is also important in recognizing the ethos of the content. The video is from NASA, a globally recognized corporation that is known for its cutting-edge technology and missions relating to space this is relevant to the video as it pertains to our atmosphere which is on the brink of outer space. A strength of the video is that it gives a clear and concise explanation of the situation and its significance caused by human-induced activities. It also emphasizes the importance of international agreements like the Montreal Protocol. A flaw could be that it oversimplifies the complexities of atmospheric sciences relating to the ozone layer.

“Ozone 101: What Is the Ozone Hole?” YouTube, YouTube, 1 Dec. 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q15t5NQ1Aik. Accessed 9 Jan. 2024.

Ocean acidification is a crucial aspect of understanding the impacts climate change has on our entire global balance. Not only does it just affect land ecosystems, but marine ones as well. It is important to recognize how detrimental it can be for marine life to have the complete chemical balance be shifted.

The intended audience is individuals who are concerned about marine life and how they are impacted by ocean acidification. The argument the text presents is that change is required to keep a stable balance that's needed for marine life to live and function correctly. The persuasion technique that the NOAA uses is logos when discussing how it affects us in the future, they use it because it is a more impactful statement providing data to back up the claim that it is harmful to the ocean. People will feel more inclined to trust the organization's intentions and credibility as well. The logos used in the article helps to establish the NOAA ethos. A strength is the use of statistics and scientific data to back up the claims they are establishing. However, a flaw could be that when discussing the effects of ocean acidification it could not take into account other human-induced issues that are affecting the ocean.

Fisheries, NOAA. “Understanding Ocean Acidification.” NOAA, www.fisheries.noaa.gov/insight/understanding-ocean-acidification#:~:text=For%20good%20reason%2C%20ocean%20acidification,health%20is%20also%20a%20concern. Accessed 9 Jan. 2024.