https://padlet.com/cheongyuetting/conclusion Please rank 1 to 10 and give constructive feedback to their conclusion. What are the good points? What can be improved? en-us 2017-06-05 05:39:11 UTC 2017-06-05 06:54:37 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Condos.png cheongyuetting https://padlet.com/cheongyuetting/conclusion/wish/175165352 To sum up the above arguments, it is not advisable to tax junk food as it will affect people's daily life. Although it may solve the problem of high obesity rate and health care expenses, there are more disadvantages than advantages. It will cause to the possible financial crisis in the city, high unemployment rate and skyrocketing living cost of the grass root.  Therefore, i strongly disagree with this policy. ]]> 2017-06-05 05:39:11 UTC https://padlet.com/cheongyuetting/conclusion/wish/175165352 cheongyuetting https://padlet.com/cheongyuetting/conclusion/wish/175165353 In short, I believe implementing junk food should be scrapped because it will heighten citizens' financial burden, lower the food production and it can only be solved in the short term. ]]> 2017-06-05 05:39:11 UTC https://padlet.com/cheongyuetting/conclusion/wish/175165353 cheongyuetting https://padlet.com/cheongyuetting/conclusion/wish/175165355 Some people think that fat tax will increase the government income. Government will make use of the tax revenue to build some facilities such as the runway or cycling trail so that people will use these facilities to solve the health problem. In my opinion, the government should not impose tax on junk food as it will increase the price of junk food and eventually the grass root may not be able to bear the cost while the rich will keep on their unhealthy eating habit. ]]> 2017-06-05 05:39:11 UTC https://padlet.com/cheongyuetting/conclusion/wish/175165355