<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Scaffold-free brain organoids differentiated from patient-derived IPSCs model familial Alzheimer&#39;s Disease by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh</link>
      <description>David Oliver
Saige Power
Ce Shang</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-12-01 02:51:35 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-11-19 02:27:08 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Raja et al, 2016</title>
         <author>ce_shang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212136117</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0161969" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-01 02:59:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212136117</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alzheimer&#39;s Disease (AD)</title>
         <author>ce_shang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212136358</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><sup>Tender Rose Dementia Care Specialists, Mar 2010: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eq_Er-tqPsA&nbsp;</sup></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eq_Er-tqPsA" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-01 03:01:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212136358</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>AD Molecular Characteristics </title>
         <author>ce_shang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212137105</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>Amyloid Beta accumulation (Aβ40 and Aβ42 for example) into plaques (Ballatore et al, 2007; Goate , 2006)</li><li>Tauopathy: Aberrant phosphorylation leading to  aggregation of hyperphosphorylated tau protein (pTau) into neurofibrillary tangles. (Ballatore et al, 2007; Buée et al, 2000; Feany et al. 1996; Lee et al, 2001).</li><li>Endosome abnormalities: enlarged endosomes (Cataldo et al, 2000; Cataldo et al, 2001) and defects in endosome trafficking (Iovino et al, 2015; Wren et al, 2015)</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-01 03:08:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212137105</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Animal Models of AD</title>
         <author>ce_shang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212137462</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Many different invertebrate and vertebrate species are used for modelling: drosophila (Dissel et al, 2017), zebrafish (Bhattarai et al, 2012), and rodents (Elder et al, 2010; Do Carmo, Cuello, 2013) where mouse models are the most prevalent<br><br>Advantages:</div><ul><li>Mouse models successfully recapitulate many molecular mechanisms involved in AD listed above (Elder et al, 2010; Webster et al, 2014; Guo, Zhou, 2017)</li><li>Use of genetic (ex: mutations in genes controlling amyloid beta deposition) and non-genetic (ex: transverse aortic constriction to induce hypertension) models can be used to model both fAD and sAD (Elder et al, 2010; Carnevale et al, 2012)</li><li>Evaluation of behaviour with cognitive and memory tasks with findings that are translatable to human AD (Webster et al, 2014).&nbsp;</li></ul><div>Disadvantages:</div><ul><li>Genetic models often require multiple mutations or copies of mutations to create a phenotype that resembles human AD (Elder et al, 2010; Webster et al, 2014). The observable molecular and behavioural phenotype measured in these models therefore does not rely on the same molecular etiologies as human AD.&nbsp;</li><li>Many drug therapies developed from mouse models fail in clinical trials, indicating a lack of efficiency in representing human AD phenotypes. (DeMattos et al, 2001; Cedernaes et al, 2014; Raja et al, 2016)</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-01 03:11:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212137462</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Research Question</title>
         <author>ce_shang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212137546</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Hypothesis</strong>: Scaffold-free brain organoids grown from fAD patient iPSCs can recapitulate the molecular mechanisms of AD phenotype and will be responsive to AD treatments.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-01 03:12:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212137546</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Results</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212705788</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 04:37:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212705788</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Future Directions</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212707298</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>This paper has successfully recapitulated AD phenotypes in organoids, which importantly are derived from human patient cells and not animals. Hence, it could be a promising model to retry therapies that failed translation from mouse models to human clinical trials (Doody et al, 2012; Doody et al, 2014; Green et al, 2009; Salloway et al, 2014). Mouse models have supported the therapeutic benefit of treatment with monoclonal antibodies specific for Aβ to resolve the AD phenotype (DeMattos et al, 2001). When this research was translated into clinical trials, many forms of anti-Aβ drugs were attempted that did not show therapeutic benefit. One such drug, called bapineuzumab, showed a significant decrease in CSF levels of pTau, but no difference in levels of Aβ and no improvement in cognitive symptoms (Blennow et al., 2012). It would be of interest to apply bapineuzumab to these organoids to assess its efficacy of resolving AD phenotypes. <ul><li>If bapineuzumab is successful in resolving the Aβ and the pTau phenotypes, this would be significant in demonstrating this model's responsiveness to treatments. It would further indicate that there are differences between the organoid model and human fAD that prevent these models from responding in the same fashion as human AD would. </li><li>If bapineuzumab is successful in resolving only the pTau phenotype, this would be an indication that the fAD organoids hold high representational power of human AD. As anti-Aβ would be inducing a decrease in pTau, it would also support the hypothesis that the hyperphosphrylation of tau protein is causally connected to increased Aβ deposition.</li><li>If bapineuzumab does not resolve the Aβ or pTau phenotypes, this could indicate a lack of responsiveness of the organoid, reflecting poorly on its representational abilities, indicating that the organoid is less sensitive than human AD. </li></ul></li><li>Due to its closer resemblance to humans, this is a model that can serve as an additional step in the translation process to test the potential of proposed therapies before these therapies move on to the more costly and time-consuming clinical trials.</li><li>Because organoids can be generated by cells from specific patients, there is also potential to develop patient specific therapies using this model. Patients can donate fibroblasts to make organoids, and for each of patient's organoids we can try a set of different drugs to see which drug works best for that patient's organoid, and consequently decide which is the drug best given to the actual patient.</li><li>When it comes to sAD, genetic factors only partially explain the risk of AD. One widely accepted notion is that the onset of AD is most likely the consequence of complicated interactions of multiple genetic and non-genetic factors (Gatz, 2006; Yang et al, 2016). Several non-genetic risk factors have been proposed, including aging, cerebro-cardiovascular diseases, metabolic disorders, traumatic brain injury, sleep disorders, chronic hypoxia, environmental toxins and high cholesterol (Yang et al, 2016; Grant et al, 2002; Styczyńska et al, 2008; Dosunmu et al, 2007). One model has even looked at sAD iPSC cells grown in culture clustered with fetal brain messenger RNA samples, and showed AD phenotypes to appear in these sAD patient-derived iPSC cells (Israel et al. 2012). However, the mechanisms underlying them still remain largely unknown, due to the lack of non-postmortem and AD patient-specific research models (Yang et al, 2016). Although the organoids produced in this paper are based on fAD mutations, they have the possibility of being used to model sAD as well. For example, researchers could take cells from sAD patients, derive iPSCs, and grow multiple organoids under some environmental conditions that may induce AD, so AD will arise in these organoids sporadically, similarly to sAD patients. Specifically, this means that for a specific sAD patient whose disease arose in a way that cannot be fully accounted for by genetic mutation, we can take these cells and grow multiple organoids, some in neutral conditions as control, and others subjected to some environment such as high cholesterol. This will allow us to better observe how the proposed environmental factors can influence disease progression in sAD patient organoids, if they are an influence at all. In addition to studying sAD disease progression, we may even be able to take one step further and use this organoid model to help design sAD patient-specific therapy.</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 04:52:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212707298</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Figure 2B: Amyloid Beta</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212707569</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div> In terms of Aβ aggregates, Organoids derived from the <em>APP</em><sup>Dp</sup>2-3 (blue bar) and the <em>PSEN1</em><sup>A264E</sup> (red bar) lines exhibited increased numbers of Aβ aggregates verses the controls. Organoids from the <em>PSEN1</em><sup>M146I</sup> (green bar) patient cell line exhibited a trend towards higher amyloid levels, but this was not significant. Values between the two control lines did not significantly differ. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243970959/d524b2c617a1c2531dcda6946555cd59/Figure_2_AB.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 04:55:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212707569</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Figure 3: fAD organoids respond to treatment, resolving the AD phenotype</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212707579</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>fAD organoids are treated with β-secretase and γ-secretase inhibitors which inhibit the formation of the complex that cleaves amyloid precursor protein into Aβ. The immunohistochemical stains below show that this treatment reduces Aβ and pTau deposition, two strong molecular indicators of the AD phenotype</div><div><br>These results indicate responsiveness of the model to treatments, meaning that this could be a possible model for screening prospective clinical therapies. There is some debate as to the timeline of emergence of human AD molecular mechanisms, but the time-dependent change in Aβ and pTau in these organoids in response to treatment also mimic human AD progression (Jack, 2014) with the appearance of Aβ plaques preceding neurofibrillary tangle formation. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243971890/87f0912f992cd7335ae1c78aa5848306/Screen_Shot_2017_12_07_at_4_48_08_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 04:55:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212707579</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212708807</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><sup>Can Brain ORGANOIDS help to unlock human brain cells. (2016, March 7). http://technologyinfoo.com/724/can-brain-organoids-help-to-unlock-human-brain- cells/</sup></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243971890/ff6c99224d425e45a93c8942e39560e0/Can_Brain_ORGANOIDS_help_to_unlock_human_brain_cells_mysteries_to_grow_them_752x440.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 05:06:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212708807</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Background and Introduction</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212881624</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 14:59:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212881624</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models of AD</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212886466</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) cultured from fAD patients can be differentiated into neurons to model human AD in vitro in 2D cultures <br><br>Advantages:</div><ul><li>Successfully produces the hallmarks of AD pathology (Yahata, 2011; Sproul, 2014; Hossini, 2015; Lullo, Kriegstein, 2017)</li><li>Because of their closeness to human AD, once they become more well established, these models may have the capacity to produce findings pertaining to the molecular phenotype of AD that hold more translational power than previous models. </li></ul><div>Disadvantages</div><ul><li>Due to the nature of 2D models, the phenotypes of aberrant extracellular protein aggregation are lost.</li><li>As for 3D models, previous methods of organoid production require a scaffold, are labor-intensive, and require exogenous over-expression of disease-relevant mutations or factors in order to express AD phenotype (Zhang et al, 2014).</li><li>While not yet well characterized, papers such as this one by Raja et al (2016) aim to develop high fidelity, well-characterized iPSC-derived 3D organoid models of fAD. </li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 15:06:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212886466</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Major Findings</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212889822</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The authors conducted three sets of experiments. The experiments in Figure 1 demonstrate that the organoids were able to recapitulate hallmark symptoms of AD. Figure 2 demonstrates that the hallmark AD phenotypes generated by the organoid could be generated from multiple cell lines with different AD-inducing mutations. Finally, Figure 3 demonstrates that the fAD organoids were responsive to common AD treatments</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 15:12:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212889822</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Conclusion &amp; Discussion</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212922235</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 16:03:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212922235</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Advantages of the fAD organoids proposed in this article</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212922835</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>These organoids were able to develop and respond to AD therapies within 90 days. Previously, scientists only insights into human AD pathology were from behavioural assessments, imaging techniques, and postmortem analysis. This will allow scientists to access live, human-derived tissue that strongly represents the human AD phenotype. </li><li>The recapitulation of the phenotype is evidenced by the induction of Aβ and pTau deposition, as well as endosomal abnormalities. The response to therapy is also evidenced by a reduction in Aβ and pTau deposition. </li><li>fAD derived organoids may be more representative of human AD pathology than traditional animal models. While many mouse models of fAD rely on genetic manipulation to produce an AD-like phenotype, fAD organoids are directly derived from human AD patients. The artificial mutagenesis required to create these animal models may create a pathology that does not replicate the course of human disease, and is therefore unsuitable for developing human therapies. By directly recreating human AD pathology, fAD organoids may provide researchers with better tools to develop AD therapies.</li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 16:04:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212922835</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Disadvantages of fAD Organoids proposed in this article</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212923328</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>While organoids may be better able to replicated the molecular etiology of AD than animals models, organoids cannot show behavioural responses. Murine AD models can be subjected to behavioural tests, allowing researchers to identify specific behavioural deficits. Researchers testing a drug in a murine AD model can examine both behavioural and molecular rescue of phenotype. While drugs may affect the molecular pathology or improve biomarkers, this does not guarantee that they will have any functional impact (Salloway et al 2014). As functional recovery cannot be measured with fAD organoids, their scope as a model system is limited. Furthermore, AD is a heterogenous pathology affecting multiple cognitive domains. Without behaviour, researchers cannot identify how molecular pathologies and treatments relate to specific cognitive deficits (Ex attentional vs memory deficits).</li><li>While this model can replicate several strains of human fAD, it does not represent sAD. Familial cases of AD are much rarer than sAD. As such, it is critical the better models of sAD be developed. The scope of fAD organoids is somewhat limited as they only represent a minority of AD cases.</li><li>As these organoids are constructed without a scaffold there is significant tissue necrosis in the centre. To combat the potential influence of the necrotic tissue the authors only examined the peripheral 250um of the organoids. However, this is a rather arbitrary decision. The figure below (supplemental figure 3) shows cleaved cascade 3 staining (white) for apoptosis, and Hoechst staining (blue) for nuclear material. It is obvious that even in the peripheral 250um there is tissue necrosis. While this may have no effect on the organoids AD relevance, the proinflammatory environment may influence the disease progression, especially given the growing epidemiological findings indicating that immune activation plays an important role in AD pathogenesis (Carnevale et al, 2012). </li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243972632/5d21899975d549e6d3a180d16339505b/Screen_Shot_2017_12_07_at_11_13_37_AM.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 16:05:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212923328</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>References</title>
         <author>d_oliver1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212942357</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>All figures adapted from Raja et al. 2016, unless otherwise cited</div><ol><li>2015 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. (2015). <em>Alzheimer’s &amp; Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association</em>, <em>11</em>(3), 332–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.003 </li><li>Alexander, G., Hanna, A., Serna, V., Younkin, L., Younkin, S., &amp; Janus, C. (2011). Increased aggression in males in transgenic Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. <em>Behavioural Brain Research</em>, <em>216</em>(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.016 </li><li> Ballatore, C., Lee, V. M. Y., &amp; Trojanowski, J. Q. (2007). Tau-mediated neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. <em>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</em>, <em>8</em>(9), 663-672. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2194 </li><li>Bhattarai, P., Thomas, A. K., Cosacak, M. I., Papadimitriou, C., Mashkaryan, V., Zhang, Y., &amp; Kizil, C. (2017). Modeling Amyloid-β42 Toxicity and Neurodegeneration in Adult Zebrafish Brain. <em>Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE</em>, (128). https://doi.org/10.3791/56014 </li><li>Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Rinne, J. o., Salloway, S., Wei, J., Black, R., Grundman, M., Liu, E. (2012). Effect of immunotherapy with bapineuzumab on cerebrospinal fluid biomarker levels in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. <em>Archives of Neurology, 69(8), </em>1002-1010. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2012.90</li><li>Buée, L., Bussière, T., Buée-Scherrer, V., Delacourte, A., &amp; Hof, P. R. (2000). Tau protein isoforms, phosphorylation and role in neurodegenerative disorders. <em>Brain Research Reviews</em>, <em>33</em>(1), 95-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(00)00019-9</li><li>Carnevale, D., Mascio, G., Ajmone-Cat, M. A., D’Andrea, I., Cifelli, G., Madonna, M., ... Minghetti, L. (2012). Role of neuroinflammation in hypertension-induced brain amyloid pathology. <em>Neurobiology of Aging</em>, <em>33</em>(1), 205.e19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.08.013 </li><li>Cataldo, A.M., Peterhoff, C.M., Troncoso, J.C., Gomez-Isla, T., Hyman, B.T., Nixon, R.A. (2000). Endocytic pathway abnormalities precede amyloid β deposition in sporadic alzheimer's disease and down syndrome: Differential effects of APOE genotype and presenilin mutations. <em>American Journal Of Pathology, </em>157 (1): 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64538-5</li><li>Cataldo, A., Rebeck, G. W., Ghetti, B., Hulette, C., Lippa, C., Van Broeckhoven, C., Van Duijn, C., Cras, P., Bogdanovic, N., Bird, T., Peterhoff, C. and Nixon, R. (2001). Endocytic disturbances distinguish among subtypes of alzheimer's disease and related disorders. <em>Ann Neurol</em>. 50: 661–665. doi:10.1002/ana.1254 </li><li>Cedernaes, J., Schiöth, H. B., &amp; Benedict, C. (2014). Efficacy of antibody-based therapies to treat Alzheimer’s disease: just a matter of timing? <em>Experimental Gerontology</em>, <em>57</em>, 104–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2014.05.002 </li><li>DeMattos, R. B., Bales, K. R., Cummins, D. J., Dodart, J.-C., Paul, S. M., &amp; Holtzman, D. M. (2001). Peripheral anti-Aβ antibody alters CNS and plasma Aβ clearance and decreases brain Aβ burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</em>, <em>98</em>(15), 8850–8855. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.151261398 </li><li>Dissel, S., Klose, M., Donlea, J., Cao, L., English, D., Winsky-Sommerer, R., ... Shaw, P. J. (2017). Enhanced sleep reverses memory deficits and underlying pathology in Drosophila models of Alzheimer’s disease. <em>Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms</em>, <em>2</em>, 15–26. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.nbscr.2016.09.001 </li><li>Do Carmo, S., &amp; Cuello, A. C. (2013). Modeling Alzheimer’s disease in transgenic rats. <em>Molecular Neurodegeneration</em>, <em>8</em>, 37. c</li><li>Doody, R. S., Raman, R., Farlow, M., Iwatsubo, T., Vellas, B., Joffe, S., ... &amp; Aisen, P. S. (2013). A phase 3 trial of semagacestat for treatment of Alzheimer's disease. <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em>, <em>369</em>(4), 341-350. </li><li>Doody, R. S., Thomas, R. G., Farlow, M., Iwatsubo, T., Vellas, B., Joffe, S., ... &amp; Siemers, E. (2014). Phase 3 trials of solanezumab for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em>, <em>370</em>(4), 311-321. </li><li>Dosunmu, R., Wu, J., Basha, M. R., &amp; Zawia, N. H. (2007). Environmental and dietary risk factors in Alzheimer’s disease. <em>Expert review of neurotherapeutics</em>, <em>7</em>(7), 887-900. </li><li>Elder, G. A., Gama Sosa, M. A., &amp; De Gasperi, R. (2010). Transgenic Mouse Models of Alzheimer’s Disease. <em>The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York</em>, <em>77</em>(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1002 /msj.20159 </li><li>Feany, M. B., &amp; Dickson, D. W. (1996). Neurodegenerative disorders with extensive tau pathology: a comparative study and review. <em>Annals of neurology</em>, <em>40</em>(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410400204</li><li>Gatz, M., Reynolds, C. A., Fratiglioni, L., Johansson, B., Mortimer, J. A., Berg, S., ... &amp; Pedersen, N. L. (2006). Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease. <em>Archives of general psychiatry</em>, <em>63</em>(2), 168-174. </li><li>Gerrish, A., Russo, G., Richards, A., Moskvina, V., Ivanov, D., Harold, D., ... &amp; Hamshere, M. (2012). The role of variation at AβPP, PSEN1, PSEN2, and MAPT in late onset Alzheimer's disease. <em>Journal of Alzheimer's Disease</em>, <em>28</em>(2), 377-387. </li><li>Goate, A. (2006). Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid β-protein precursor gene with familial Alzheimer's disease. <em>Journal of Alzheimer's Disease</em>, <em>9</em>(s3), 341-347. </li><li>Grant, W. B., Campbell, A., Itzhaki, R. F., &amp; Savory, J. (2002). The significance of environmental factors in the etiology of Alzheimer's disease. <em>Journal of Alzheimer's Disease</em>, <em>4</em>(3), 179-189. </li><li>Green, R. C., Schneider, L. S., Amato, D. A., Beelen, A. P., Wilcock, G., Swabb, E. A., ... &amp; Tarenflurbil Phase 3 Study Group. (2009). Effect of tarenflurbil on cognitive decline and activities of daily living in patients with mild Alzheimer disease: a randomized controlled trial. <em>Jama</em>, <em>302</em>(23), 2557-2564. </li><li>Guo, B., &amp; Zhou, Q. (2017). How efficient are rodent models for Alzheimer’s disease drug discovery? <em>Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery</em>, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2018.1398730 </li><li>Hossini, A. M., Megges, M., Prigione, A., Lichtner, B., Toliat, M. R., Wruck, W., ... Adjaye, J. (2015). Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neuronal cells from a sporadic Alzheimer’s disease donor as a model for investigating AD-associated gene regulatory networks. <em>BMC Genomics</em>, <em>16</em>(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1262-5 </li><li>Hou, S., Lu, P. (2016). Direct reprogramming of somatic cells into neural stem cells or neurons for neurological disorders. <em>Neural Regen Res, 11(1),</em> 28-31. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.169602</li><li>Iovino, M., Agathou, S., González-Rueda, A., Del Castillo Velasco-Herrera, M., Borroni, B., Alberici, A., ... &amp; Vallier, L. (2015). Early maturation and distinct tau pathology in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons from patients with MAPT mutations. <em>Brain</em>, <em>138</em>(11), 3345-3359. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv222</li><li>Israel, M. A., Yuan, S. H., Bardy, C., Reyna, S. M., Mu, Y., Herrera, C., ... &amp; Carson, C. T. (2012). Probing sporadic and familial Alzheimer/'s disease using induced pluripotent stem cells. <em>Nature</em>, <em>482</em>(7384), 216-220. </li><li>Jack, C. R., Knopman, D. S., Jagust, W. J., Petersen, R. C., Weiner, M. W., Aisen, P. S., ... Trojanowski, J. Q. (2013). Update on hypothetical model of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers. <em>Lancet Neurology</em>, <em>12</em>(2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70291-0 Kosaka, T., Imagawa, M., Seki, K., Arai, H., Sasaki, H., Tsuji, S., ... &amp; Iwatsubo, T. (1997). The beta APP717 Alzheimer mutation increases the percentage of plasma amyloid-beta protein ending at A beta 42 (43). <em>Neurology</em>, <em>48</em>(3), 741-745. </li><li>Krishnaswamy, S., Verdile, G., Groth, D., Kanyenda, L., &amp; Martins, R. N. (2009). The structure and function of Alzheimer’s gamma secretase enzyme complex. <em>Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences</em>, <em>46</em>(5–6), 282–301. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408360903335821 </li><li>Lemere, C. A., Lopera, F., Kosik, K. S., Lendon, C. L., Ossa, J., Saido, T. C., ... &amp; Hincapie, L. (1996). The E280A presenilin 1 Alzheimer mutation produces increased Aβ42 deposition and severe cerebellar pathology. <em>Nature medicine</em>, <em>2</em>(10), 1146-1150. </li><li>Lee, V. M., Goedert, M., &amp; Trojanowski, J. Q. (2001). Neurodegenerative tauopathies. <em>Annual review of neuroscience</em>, <em>24</em>(1), 1121-1159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1121</li><li>Lullo, E. D., &amp; Kriegstein, A. R. (2017). The use of brain organoids to investigate neural development and disease. <em>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</em>, <em>18</em>(10), nrn.2017.107. https://doi.org/10.1038 /nrn.2017.107 </li><li>Raja, W. K., Mungenast, A. E., Lin, Y.-T., Ko, T., Abdurrob, F., Seo, J., &amp; Tsai, L.-H. (2016). Self-Organizing 3D Human Neural Tissue Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Recapitulate Alzheimer’s Disease Phenotypes. <em>PLOS ONE</em>, <em>11</em>(9), e0161969. https://doi.org /10.1371/journal.pone.0161969 </li><li>Rosemblatt, M., Fellous, A., Mazie, J. C., Delacourte, A., &amp; Defossez, A. (1989). Alzheimer’s disease: microtubule-associated proteins 2 (MAP 2) are not components of paired helical filaments. <em>FEBS Letters</em>, <em>252</em>(1–2), 91–94. </li><li>Rovelet-Lecrux, A., Hannequin, D., Raux, G., Le Meur, N., Laquerrière, A., Vital, A., ... &amp; Dubas, F. (2006). APP locus duplication causes autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. <em>Nature genetics</em>, <em>38</em>(1), 24-27. </li><li>Salloway, S., Sperling, R., Fox, N. C., Blennow, K., Klunk, W., Raskind, M., ... &amp; Reichert, M. (2014). Two phase 3 trials of bapineuzumab in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em>, <em>370</em>(4), 322-333. </li><li>Sproul, A. A., Jacob, S., Pre, D., Kim, S. H., Nestor, M. W., Navarro-Sobrino, M., ... Noggle, S. A. (2014). Characterization and Molecular Profiling of PSEN1 Familial Alzheimer’s Disease iPSC-Derived Neural Progenitors. <em>PLoS ONE</em>, <em>9</em>(1). https://doi.org/10.1371 /journal.pone.0084547 </li><li>Styczyńska, M., Strosznajder, J. B., Religa, D., Chodakowska-Żebrowska, M., Pfeffer, A., Gabrylewicz, T., ... &amp; Barcikowska, M. (2008). Association between genetic and environmental factors and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. <em>Folia Neuropathologica</em>, <em>46</em>(4). </li><li>Webster, S. J., Bachstetter, A. D., Nelson, P. T., Schmitt, F. A., Eldik, V., &amp; J, L. (2014). Using mice to model Alzheimer’s dementia: an overview of the clinical disease and the preclinical behavioral changes in 10 mouse models. <em>Frontiers in Genetics</em>, <em>5</em>. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00088 Yahata, N., Asai, M., Kitaoka, S., Takahashi, K., Asaka, I., Hioki, H., ... Inoue, H. (2011). Anti-Aβ </li><li>Wren, M. C., Zhao, J., Liu, C. C., Murray, M. E., Atagi, Y., Davis, M. D., ... &amp; Tacik, P. (2015). Frontotemporal dementia-associated N279K tau mutant disrupts subcellular vesicle trafficking and induces cellular stress in iPSC-derived neural stem cells. <em>Molecular neurodegeneration</em>, <em>10</em>(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-015-0042-7</li><li>Drug Screening Platform Using Human iPS Cell-Derived Neurons for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. <em>PLOS ONE</em>, <em>6</em>(9), e25788. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025788 </li><li>Yang, J., Li, S., He, X. B., Cheng, C., &amp; Le, W. (2016). Induced pluripotent stem cells in Alzheimer’s disease: applications for disease modeling and cell-replacement therapy. <em>Molecular neurodegeneration</em>, <em>11</em>(1), 39.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-016-0106-3 </li><li>Zhang, D., Pekkanen-Mattila, M., Shahsavani, M., Falk, A., Teixeira, A. I., &amp; Herland, A. (2014). A 3D Alzheimer's disease culture model and the induction of P21-activated kinase mediated sensing in iPSC derived neurons. <em>Biomaterials</em>, <em>35</em>(5), 1420-1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.028</li></ol>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 16:36:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/212942357</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Possible questions for the field</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213475217</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>While iPSC induction erases epigenetic factors, direct reprogramming has been shown to maintain epigenetic memory (Hou, Lu, 2016). With more research being conducted on the epigenetics of AD, one question in the field of AD organoinds going forward could be whether it would be feasible and practical to differentiate a brain organoid through direct reprogramming as opposed to IPSC induction. By direct reporgramming brain organoids from sAD patient cells, this may provide a possible model for studying the epigenetic factors contributing to sAD. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-05 19:34:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213475217</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>AD Symptoms</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213476554</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(AD) is an age-related, progressive neurodegenerative disorder associated with cognitive decline, severe memory impairments, anxiety, circadian rhythm disturbances, activity disturbances, and aggression. It is associated with brain atrophy, neuronal losses, dense extracellular deposits of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (Webster et al, 2014). </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-05 19:36:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213476554</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>AD Prevalence</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213476958</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It is currently the 6th leading cause of death in the United States. With medical advances increasing life expectancies and the growing population of seniors, the incidence of AD in the US is said to increase from 5.3 million patients to 13.8 million by 2050 (Alzheimer's Association, 2015). This reflects an urgent need for reserach to be conducted with models that can yield relevant results that can be translated to a clinical setting.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-05 19:37:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213476958</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>AD Causes</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213477791</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The full etiology of AD is unknown. It can be broadly divided into sAD (sporadic) and fAD (familial). fAD has been attributed to a series of mutations in the amyloid pathway. Epidemiological studies have considered risk factors for AD that may result in sAD. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-05 19:38:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213477791</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Figure 1: Amyloid Beta</title>
         <author>d_oliver1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213972374</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Immunohistochemisty using an Aβ specific antibody on 60 and 90 day old cultures shows a time dependant increase in Aβ deposition. Organoids created from fAD cells showed significantly higher levels of Aβ deposition compared to controls. Staining for MAP2, a neuronal protein, suggests both intracellular and extracellular plaques. This suggests that fAD organoids mayrecapitulate the degenerative Aβ pathology central to alzheimer's disease.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243972632/c6e7c9836cf85503b31b2f24f81b606c/Screen_Shot_2017_12_06_at_10_24_30_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 03:24:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213972374</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Figure 1: Hyperphosphorylated Tau</title>
         <author>d_oliver1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213975299</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Using an antibody specific for pTau, the authors show increased pTau deposition in fAD organoids compared to controls. It is important to note that this increase is only significant at the 90 day time point, suggesting that Tau pathology may be antecedent to Aβ pathology. This finding is replicated using a second antibody specific to pTau, although this data is not displayed here. This suggests that fAD organoids may recapitulate AD Tau pathology.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243972632/5dab52d31bb92ccdb53041f194dba084/Screen_Shot_2017_12_06_at_10_45_13_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 03:46:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213975299</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Figure 1: Endosomal Abnormalities</title>
         <author>d_oliver1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213975427</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Immunohistochemical staining for EEA1, an early end-somalia marker, shows a significant increase in the number of large endosomes in fAD organoids compared to controls. The authors also measured functional endocytosis by allowing cells to take up labelled transferrin. They noted that cells from fAD organoids had significantly larger endosomes compared to controls. This suggests that fAD organoids may model the endosomal abnormalities associated with AD.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243972632/69fb113f75387092969884abdfc4a45b/Screen_Shot_2017_12_06_at_10_53_18_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 03:47:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213975427</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Creation of Organoids</title>
         <author>d_oliver1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213977976</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Organoids were produced using donated fibroblasts from patients with fAD resulting from the <em>APP</em><sup>Dp</sup>1-1 mutation, and healthy age matched controls. Donated cells were induced to pluripotency, which was validated by staining cells for TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81. Pluripotent cells were then plated to form embryoid bodies (EB) in a growth medium promoting neural lineage differentiation. After 18–20 days the EBs were separated and allowed to mature for a further 15–20 days in a growth medium with factors promoting neural epithelial formation. Following this, cells were moved to a growth medium containing 2% matrigel for the remainder of the experiment (supplemental figure 2).</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243972632/f24b07dc4bf60eaedb8373e9c412de57/Screen_Shot_2017_12_06_at_11_19_19_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 04:16:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213977976</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Validation of Organoids</title>
         <author>d_oliver1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213979409</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Immunohistochemical staining for Sox2, a marker of neural progenitor cells, and MAP2, a marker of mature neurons, shows that organoids develop stratified layers (supplemental figure 2). Further, organoids display characteristic neural rosettes. Based on cleaved caspase expression, all data was collected from the outer 250um of tissue so as to exclude any necrotic tissue in the centre of the organoid. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243972632/a1425d872905ab1a7620e2a7f2bab7d5/Screen_Shot_2017_12_06_at_11_29_19_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 04:32:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/213979409</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Significant Conclusions</title>
         <author>d_oliver1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214132096</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The authors were able to create scaffold-free organoids from multiple lines of fAD iPSCs that both recapitulated the major symptoms of AD pathology, and responded to common AD treatments. The evidence presented supports the authors hypothesis, and suggests that fAD organoids may be a useful model system. The ease of organoid growth could allow for high throughput screening of novel AD therapies.<br><br></div><ul><li>The authors were able to demonstrate that fAD organoids show the major molecular symptoms of AD (Figure 1). Without this, these organoids would show little promise as a model system.</li><li>Organoids grown using tissue from multiple different fAD patients shows that these organoids are a useful model for studying multiple forms of fAD (Figure 2). The potential for performing experiments on cells with different fAD causing mutations will increase the robustness of any experimental findings.</li><li>By culturing organoids in growth media containing common AD therapeutics, the authors were able to reduce the severity of AD symptomology (Figure 3). This demonstrates the usefulness of fAD organoids as a model system for drug development.</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 14:41:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214132096</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Experimental Data Issues</title>
         <author>d_oliver1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214155826</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>Despite the stated ease of growing fAD organoids, the authors include very small samples sizes in many experiments. While the authors do manage to achieve statistical significance, there is extremely high variability in some groups. For example, the vehicle treated groups in figure 3 show very high variability, with some vehicle treated organoids showing no pathology. In conjunction with the small sample size, this raises the possibility that the observed results are merely an artifact of a small highly variable sample. </li><li>While the paper was broadly well constructed, there were a number of significant errors in figure design. For example, Figure 1 B in the original paper is missing an arrow head which should indicate intracellular amyloid beta. These omissions are compounded by inconsistencies in font size and colour coding throughout. While this does not directly impact on the validity of the author's results, it reduces the readability and credibility of the paper.</li><li>The authors examined endosomal abnormalities as a characteristic phenotype of AD in their effort to recapitulate AD phenotypes in the initial organoids derived from the <em>APP</em><sup>Dp</sup>1-1 line. But when they showed the results of recapitulating AD pathology in organoids derived from additional lines, there was no mentioning of any efforts to analyze whether there was presence of endosomal abnormalities in this section. This is an inconsistency they should address. </li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 15:20:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214155826</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Figure 3: Resolution of pTau phenotype</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214217224</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Immunohistochemical staining for Serine 396, a phosphotylated tau residue, shows significant decrease in pTau deposition in the treated organoids than the vehicle-treated controls. This signifcant difference appeared 60 days after treatment began, indicating that there is a temporal difference in resolution of the pTau phenotype and the Aβ phenotype.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243971890/d8588358d35cd002ff172f85b9ea5bfd/journal_pone_0161969_g003.tif" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 17:02:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214217224</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Figure 3: Resolution of Aβ phenotype</title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214245413</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Immunohistochemical staining for D54D2, indicative of Aβ deposition, indicates that at 30 days, there are significantly fewer 3-6um plaques in the treated organoids than in the vehicle-treated controls. At 60 days, there are significantly fewer 1-3um, 3-6um, and 6um&lt; plaques in the treated organoids than in the control group. There are no significant differences in plaque size between the treatment and control groups</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243971890/61ed17c9214a139bc1ab592596e4446f/Screen_Shot_2017_12_07_at_4_55_41_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 17:54:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214245413</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Figure 2: Organoids from multiple AD lines recapitulate AD pathology</title>
         <author>ce_shang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214277055</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>To confirm that observed pathologies were not limited to the <em>APP</em><sup>Dp</sup>1-1  line , but rather generalizable to fAD, the researchers created organoids from 3 other lines of patient-derived iPSC with different mutations. They saw similar significant phenotypes in 2 of the 3 lines after 90d of culture. Specifically, the 3 lines are an additional <em>APP</em> duplication line <em>APP</em><sup>Dp</sup>2-3, and two <em>PSEN1</em> fAD mutant lines <em>PSEN1</em><sup>M146I</sup>, <em>PSEN1</em><sup>A264E</sup>. Below is the immunohistochemistry of these 3 lines compared to 2 lines of control. Visually, staining of D45D2 and MAP2 suggests higher levels of Aβ aggregation, and staining of Ser396 suggests higher levels of pTau, compared to the controls.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243970959/0b0db4115f18f3cd26904d19ad7fe40e/Figure_2_immunohisto.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 18:56:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214277055</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Figure 2C: Tauopathy</title>
         <author>ce_shang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214287909</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Examining the presence of pTau immunoreactivity, again the <em>APP</em><sup>Dp</sup>2-3 and the <em>PSEN1</em><sup>A264E</sup> organoids (blue and red) exhibited increased pTau (Ser396) immunoreactivity. However, the <em>PSEN1</em><sup>M146I</sup> organoids (green) did not differ from control. Each data point represent one organoid, and values between the two control lines did not significantly differ.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243970959/8f8bdeebb5be0d8b3cb93b546f750f80/Figure_2_tau.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 19:15:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214287909</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>fAD Mutations</title>
         <author>ce_shang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214319297</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>Much of the current understanding comes from studying mutation of fAD patients</li><li>For example, mutations involving the Aβ processing enzymes presenilin 1 and 2 (<em>PSEN1</em>, <em>PSEN2</em>), which are part of the γ-secretase complex that cuts APP into Aβ (Lamere et al, 1996;  Gerrish et al, 2012) </li><li>Or, mutations/duplications of the amyloid precursor protein (<em>APP</em>) gene itself (Rovelet-Lecrux et al, 2006; Kosaka et al, 1996).</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 20:19:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214319297</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>saige_power</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214351350</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><sup>The mouse: the scientist’s best friend. (n.d.) https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/277169.php</sup></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243971890/506fec6b044129efbe4434cf336027be/mouse.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-07 22:32:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214351350</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Experiment Flow Chart</title>
         <author>ce_shang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214385336</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By Ce Shang, David Oliver, and Saige Power, demonstratingthe experimental protocol by Raja et al, 2016</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/243970959/ff095c202bd9fb24001cff2382b519db/Experiment_Flow_Chart.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-08 05:01:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ce_shang/6kypw78vwpxh/wish/214385336</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
