Stephen Krashen on Language Acquisition by

Group 2

2024-11-20 05:13:57 UTC

4.The Input Hypothesis. After reading this article we understand that learners progress in their knowledge of the language when they comprehend language input that is slightly more advanced than their current level. Krashen called this level of input "i+1", where "i" is the learner's interlanguage and "+1" is the next stage of language acquisition. And we also understand that hypothesis can significantly enhance language acquisition strategies and make language learning more effective.

2 nd group 3rd hypothesis

2024-11-20 05:17:43 UTC

This hypothesis suggests that language learners have a ,,monitor,, that they can use to edit their speech or writing for grammatical accuracy . The monitor assists us to check our language output. There are three conditions that must be met for the monitor to be effective : 1.time

2. focus on form 3 .know the rules .

When the learners start to check their language ,it can lead to over-thinking.

Overall, the monitor hypothesis is a theory that highlights the importance of a

language accuracy in language learning .

1 group. Natural order hypothesis

2024-11-20 05:20:55 UTC

Zarina and Aisha Mamajonova

Learning language as a first language children usually learned grammar in predictable way. Some grammar rules learned earlier while others picked up later. The example might be the grammar with ING ending like "He is playing football" or the plural s like (Books / Cats). However more complex grammar caught later such as third person singular marker as "She plays the piano" or the possessive "John's hat" learned much later. Furthermore researches discovered that children learn language as a second language they also tend to follow natural order.

Dilsora Ruxshona Mengishova shohsanam

2024-11-20 07:06:09 UTC

The natural order hypothesis is the idea that children learning their first language acquire grammatical structures in a pre-determined, 'natural' order, and that some are acquired earlier than others.Example

According to the natural order hypothesis, learners acquire the grammatical morpheme -ing before the morpheme third person -s.

1 group

2024-11-20 07:11:44 UTC

Ruxshona Tursunboeva

1. Acquisition

You listen, talk, and use the language naturally. You don’t think too much about grammar or rules—it just starts to feel right.

2. Learning

You sit down and learn the grammar, rules, and why the language works the way it does.

The Input Hypothesis is a theory in language learning proposed by Stephen Krashen. It suggests that people learn a new language most effectively when they are exposed to language that is slightly above their current level, but still understandable. This "comprehensible input" helps learners gradually acquire the language without explicit instruction.

2024-11-20 07:13:03 UTC

Rahimjonova Bibisora 2-group. The monitor hypothesis

2024-11-20 07:20:05 UTC

The idea of the monitor hypothesis holds some criticism for being inadequate. The 'Monitor Hypothesis' doesn't really go into detail concerning implicit rules or how monitoring functions in them. Learners acquire grammatical structures in a natural order, but conscious language rules are not developed until later. Once a student has conscious knowledge of grammatical structures, they are able to edit, or self-monitor, oral and written language.The monitor hypothesis maintains that conscious learning can function only as a monitor or editor that checks and repairs the output of the acquired system and implies that formal rules, or conscious learning, play only a limited role in second language performance. Monitors also check in regularly with students' teachers to determine if their students are keeping up with classwork, to find out if there are upcoming.

The natural order Hypothesis

2024-11-20 07:23:02 UTC

The Natural Order Hypothesis says that people learn grammar in a predictable order. For example, in English, children learning the language usually learn some grammar rules, like adding -ing (e.g., “He is playing”), earlier than others, like adding ’s for possession (e.g., “John’s hat”). Studies show this order is the same for many learners, even when English is their second language. Researchers found that this pattern is similar for adults too.

2 Group

fotimaxamroqulova7 — 2024-11-20 08:12:36 UTC

Monitor Hypothesis

I understood that Monitor Hypothesis is a idea that how we learn and accept the second language. Monitor helps us when we learn or speak something mistakenly it shows in where we speak or write mistakenly.And I think that's so helpful for who is in hesitation in language learning.And I also noticed that Krashen emphasized that learners don't have to use Monitor all the time, I'm agree with that because of when we use it too much and all the time we see our incorrect speech and exercises ,we may loss our motivation or passion.

The monitor hypothesis

2024-11-20 17:32:38 UTC

The monitor hypothesis is the thing which suggests that language learners have a monitor that they can use to edit their speech or writing for grammatical accuracy.The monitor is a conscious process that allows learners to check their language output against their knowledge of the language rules they have learned.According to the Monitor Hypothesis, there are three conditions that must be met for the monitor to be effective in improving language accuracy. They are:

1 sufficient time

2 language rules

3 focus on form.