“What type of courage? What kind of creativity?” is needed for them to succeed?

Courage is the ability to face and overcome fear

There are 6 types of courage. These are: physical, social, moral, emotional, intellectual, and spiritual. We all face each of these types of courage in our lives

Firefighters: A firefighter rushing into a burning building to save lives for people. They put themselves in harm’s way to help others

Soldiers: A soldier must overcome their own fear to protect their country

people with courage and creativity can push back against the forces of evil.

Examble of creactivies in vietnamese war: The iconic Bếp Hoàng Cầm has kept Vietnamese soldiers well-fed for decades. If you have ever visited war museums or revolutionary sites, the chances are that you will have seen a wood-burning stove model where you can cook food, but no firelight nor smoke can be seen coming out of it.

Police:A police officer alway have to face dangrous criminal.

1.Courage:

1. Physical Courage

Physical courage involves proceeding despite fear of physical harm. You would exercise physical courage when entering situations where your body may be under threat. At times, you know you will be harmed, but you feel you have to proceed regardless because of a moral, personal, or social obligation to do so.

You may also need to use your fine and gross motor skills to protect yourself in these situations.

2. Social Courage

Social courage is the courage to expose yourself to social situations where you may be vulnerable to embarrassment, ridicule, or discomfort. People who have social anxiety might need this type of courage. They need to muster this courage whenever they enter a social situation.

Others may need social courage when in a leadership situation. They have to ask people in their teams to have faith in them and follow their lead. This can be intimidating if you’re new to a leadership role or feel like your leadership may be questioned by team members.

3. Moral Courage

Moral courage is the courage to stand up for your convictions despite the sense that it may end badly for you. This is a type of courage that is often exercised when your morals conflict with mainstream social views.

People with moral courage may expect to be ridiculed or socially excluded because of their views, which may even be taboo. They may also personally stand to lose from their actions but do things because they’re the right thing to do rather than because they have utilitarian values.

In these cases, they choose to act out of moral courage due to the strength of their own personal values

4. Emotional Courage

Emotional courage involves allowing ourselves to feel the full spectrum of human emotions. In some situations, we may try to protect ourselves by appearing aloof, uncaring, or disconnected. But people with emotional courage proceed into emotional relationships with the knowledge that they may be emotionally impacted by that relationship at some point in the future.

5. Intellectual Courage

Intellectual courage is the willingness to learn and expand our horizons. This is a type of courage that’s in decline in a world where everyone is retreating into information bubbles, overdosing on confirmation bias, and embracing cancel culture.

People with intellectual courage are willing to have their minds changed in the face of facts and debate despite the vulnerability of having their views undermined by new information. As with all types of courage, there needs to be vulnerability here (i.e. that you may come up across uncomforting information) in order for this to be considered a form of courage.

6. Spiritual Courage

Spiritual courage is the courage to face up to spiritual questions that may be uncomfortable, a threat to your own identity as a spiritual person, or undermine your own spiritual beliefs.

It is similar to intellectual courage. However, where intellectual courage is the willingness to address issues of logic and information, spiritual courage ventures into philosophical questions that are often unanswerable.

Often, people who do not have spiritual courage will live an unexamined life wherein they choose not to think about their own mortality or spiritual questions.

People can be atheists and agnostics and still have spiritual courage. It involves the courage to ask spiritual questions rather than simply the courage to be religious.

2.Creativity

1. Deliberate and cognitive creativity. Individuals who exhibit deliberate and cognitive creativity are research-oriented and favor repeated experiments and investigations to achieve their creative goals. A part of the brain called the prefrontal cortex (PFC) allows for extended periods of focus and information-gathering that typifies this kind of creativity. Thomas Edison’s work on the light bulb, which required numerous trials, is a perfect example of deliberate and cognitive creativity

2. Deliberate and emotional creativity. The amygdala and cingulate cortex regulate deliberate and emotional creativity, which combines a reliance on logic and facts with emotional sensitivity. Individuals who fall under this category favor quiet time, which helps generate random “a-ha” moments of clarity and creative inspiration.

3. Spontaneous and cognitive creativity. A “eureka” moment, like the one that reportedly inspired Isaac Newton’s theories on gravity, defines spontaneous and cognitive creativity. Creative people in this category often need to shift their focus from the problem at hand and focus on different activities. At these moments, the basal ganglia of the brain activate unconscious awareness, allowing the PFC to draw on their body of knowledge and connect information. Solutions arise when an idea or external inspiration triggers the brain.

4.Spontaneous and emotional creativity. Great artists—like painters, authors, and musicians—often meet the criteria for spontaneous and emotional creativity. The amygdala—which oversees emotional thinking—generates epiphanies, or sudden moments of inspiration, which allow them to see a situation from a completely new perspective. Epiphanies aren’t forced or manufactured but simply require patience.

In order to push back the darkness, it is not just one type of courage and creativity that can make a difference, it's a whole team of them and physical courage is one part of the team.

Let me start my ideas. Physical courage is the bravery to confront immediate physical dangers, like facing dangerous people and others.

Physical courage is like being a real-life superhero. It's about being brave and stepping up when there's danger, like when you protect someone from harm or stop a bad situation.

Let me give you an example. Police officers are willing to rush into dangers to catch bad guys, villain to protect innocent citizens. Thank you for listening.

Moral courage is the ability to stand up for justice and practice what is important to take into account ethical considerations, and moral behavior when faced with a dilemma, sometimes, we may face situations where we have to make a decision that goes against the pressure to do something else. Let me give you an example:

Speaking out against injustices even when no one else does.

Thank you for listening.

Chúng mình sẽ hoàn thành trước ngày thứ 5 nhé tuần này ngày 25/04

MOTION: "Should schools have mandatory physical education classes every day?"

Nay các con tùy chọn affirmative hoặc negative side, sau đó trình bày đẩy đủ role của first speaker.

Should zoos be abolished?

Các con tự chọn side negative hoặc positive. Thực hiện các research cần thiết để có các evidence, examples để support nó.

CHÚ Ý, CÁC CON QUAY VIDEO BÀI NÓI CỦA MÌNH.

Motion: Should students be required to do chores at home?

I think when children do chores it not just help their parents it also give them more skills.If they just play games and do what they want in their free times they will do nothings,they will be lazy.Beside they are just loosing their times for doing thing that is not useful.When the children do not do chores what will happen?Of course their parents will do all of them,that’s not fair.They just wait for their parents to do all the chores.They can’t do anything.Let me give you a example:When their parents went outside to do work they will not sitting there and waiting for there parents to come home and cook diner for them.Sometimes doing course with family is fun.Spending there valuable times together will help family to link together.Thank you for listening and good bye!

Before we begin our argument, let's make sure we're on the same page. Chores are tasks that are tedious but should be done anyway. Students are generally children who study at schools. Our team firmly stands in opposition to students shouldn't do housework. And now, let's come to my very first argument.

Students should prioritize their studies over chores to excel academically. Chores can increase stress and distract from learning, hindering academic performance. Studies show that students who spend more time on household chores have lower academic performance. Prioritizing studies over chores is crucial for academic success.

Chores can negatively impact students' mental health, leading to burnout and exhaustion. Prioritizing well-being over chores allows students to recharge and succeed in their studies. According to the American Psychological Association, stress from balancing academic responsibilities and household chores can lead to increased levels of anxiety and depression among students. Prioritizing mental health by reducing the burden of chores can help prevent burnout and improve overall well-being.

While chores teach valuable skills, students already have a heavy workload. Prioritizing education allows students to develop skills through other means without added stress. Students can develop important life skills, such as time management and responsibility, through extracurricular activities and part-time jobs. Prioritizing education over chores allows students to learn these skills without added stress.

In conclusion, we've presented a convincing argument with evidence and logical reasoning. It's clear that students should not do chores. Together, we can help students achieve the highest academic heights they can physically do.

"In student surveys conducted over the four years, over 90% of the students feel they learn using the system."

"According to this survey, 87% of teachers believe that homework is an effective way to reinforce learning. It also found that 75% of students agreed that homework was useful"

"Harris Cooper, a leading researcher in the field of homework, conducted a meta-analysis and found a positive correlation between homework and academic achievement. He concluded that homework is beneficial, particularly for older students."

"A study conducted at the University of Michigan found that homework can improve students' academic performance, especially in subjects like math and science."

• By having homework as one of their main obligations, they learn how to prioritize things that might not be enjoyable to them, but ultimately are beneficial to them in the long run.

• A study in 1986 by Hill, Spencer, Alston, and Fitzgerald found that there is a positive link between homework and student achievement.

• Alfie Kohn says students benefit from certain types of assignments, these home-appropriate assignments are kitchen experiments and activities that can involve family members such as completing puzzles, watching informative videos, and reading.

Motion 1: Are Video Games Beneficial for Kids?

Positive side:

Idea 2: Make learning more interactive and enjoyable.

Negative side:

Idea 1: lead to physical health problems such as eye strain, poor posture

Idea 2: video games can detract from homework and study time

"In spite of the importance of video game play to adolescents, however, over the past few decades psychologists have focused primarily on the link between video game use and negative outcomes, such as addiction and aggression.".

"According to a study published in the journal Pediatrics, children who played video games for less than an hour a day showed better psychosocial adjustment than those who didn't play at all. Furthermore, a report by the Entertainment Software Association revealed that 70% of parents believe video games have a positive influence on their child's life. These statistics underscore the potential benefits of gaming for children's development."

"Experts in child development, such as Dr. Peter Gray, a research professor at Boston College, advocate for the benefits of play, including digital play. He argues that well-designed video games offer opportunities for children to explore, experiment, and learn in engaging ways. Additionally, researchers like Dr. Cheryl Olson, co-director of the Center for Mental Health and Media at Massachusetts General Hospital, emphasize that gaming can improve problem-solving abilities and spatial skills, which are valuable in academic and professional settings."

1.According to Dominka Hatodziuk ,she have say: Using video games in eLearning can greatly improve user engagement and comprehension. Effective animation should be clear, consistent, and functional, enhancing the learning experience.

2.According to the news.harvard/ Students who actively participate in classrooms employing active learning strategies learn more than they think they do

Let me give you a example for the idea 1 for the Negative side :When student use many video games they will fell very like to learn but on the anorther side it can harm children health.

Let me give you 2 evidance to support the motion:

1.According to R.S. Paffenbarger Jr., R.T. Hyde, A.L. Wing, et al.

They have said:

Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni

2. More than two-thirds of Americans children play video games and being weaker beacause playing to much video games.

Let me give you a example for the idea 2 on the Negative side:When they play videos games to much they will be lazy and they will have very small amount of time to do homework.

Let me give you 2 evidance to support the motion:

1. What’s really motivating about a good learning game is the learning,” says Louisa Rosenheck, researcher at MIT’s Education Arcade Lab and a an adjunct lecturer at HGSE. “Humans like to learn, and we like to get better at things.” But, she observes, many games used in classrooms or that are deemed “educational” tend to focus on content and procedural skills, and don’t necessarily encourage learning that sparks intrinsic motivation and genuine engagement.

2.According to Science Direct they have say What’s really motivating about a good learning game is the learning,” says Louisa Rosenheck, researcher at MIT’s Education Arcade Lab and a an adjunct lecturer at HGSE. “Humans like to learn, and we like to get better at things.” But, she observes, many games used in classrooms or that are deemed “educational” tend to focus on content and procedural skills, and don’t necessarily encourage learning that sparks intrinsic motivation and genuine engagement.

SAU ĐÓ CÁC CON QUAY VIDEO TRÌNH BÀY.

The claim that zoos inspire conservation awareness is valid to some extent, as they offer visitors a chance to see and learn about exotic animals they might not encounter otherwise. However, research suggests that the long-term impact of zoo visits on conservation attitudes and behaviours is mixed, with factors like interpretive quality and visitor engagement playing crucial roles.

Regarding conservation efforts, while zoos participate in breeding programs and species reintroduction initiatives, critics argue that these efforts prioritize charismatic species over less glamorous ones. Moreover, the effectiveness of captive breeding programs in bolstering wild populations remains a subject of debate, with some studies questioning their long-term viability.

MOTION: Should mobile phones be allowed in the classrooms?

Let me give you a example :When the student from all the world use mobie phone and the student don’t focus to learn they use mobie phone every where .The school from a school to like a place when very people use mobie instand of learning.That’s good?Ofcourse that’s not good .

Now lets come to my frist argument.

   Mobile phones are a constant source of distraction for students. The allure of social media notifications, text messages, and online entertainment can easily divert their attention away from the lesson at hand. Even if students intend to use their phones responsibly, the temptation to check for updates or messages can be overwhelming. This distraction not only disrupts their own learning process but also affects the entire classroom environment by detracting from the teacher's ability to deliver lessons effectively.

  Let me give you a evidence to support my team opinion: Michael Rich, an associate professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School, explains that students can’t meaningfully absorb information while also texting, scrolling, or watching YouTube videos. The human brain is incapable of true multitasking, and rapid-switch-tasking doesn’t allow for deep understanding of subjects

Let me paint a vivid picture for you,  imagine a world where:

children always get distracted when they were learning just because of a phone.

Today we confront the question:

Before we begin our argument, let's ensure we're on the same page regarding the key terms in the motion.

should mobile phones be allowed in the classroom

Our team firmly stands on the oposition that we shouldn't bring mobile phone to school

and now let’s come to my very argument. 

if we bring mobile phone to school children can easily get distracted. Ho? Mobile can have many application and most of them is for entertaining so they can hide the teacher and play games for the whole lesson.In conclusion, we've presented a compelling argument unsupported by evidence and logical reasoning. It's clear that  our argument stands strong. Thank you so much for your attention

Now lets turn to our original argument in support of phones shouldn't be aloud in classrooms.

Mobile phone is a cheat way when student do test, also makes students don't listen to lectures. They can search questions can then cheat and play games in class. Base on RICE UNIVERSITY, Parents and principals who favor banning cell phones in classrooms argue they distract students and diminish focus, can provide students access to questionable content, increase cyberbullying and other disciplinary issues, create physical and mental health issues. Some people may think mobile phones might be useful for students questions, but however, like I've said, mobile phones are the savior in difficult questions.

Now, as the final speaker, I urge you to reflect on weight of our position and depth of our reasoning. Once more, we firmly stand here as the belief that mobile phones shouldn't be aloud in classrooms because of mobile phones can distrub students learning. As we move forward, lets remember the importance of speaking up, staying strong , and creating the change we wish to see. Thank you for being a part of this journey with us.

However, while robots can handle specific tasks effectively, the role of a teacher extends far beyond the transfer of knowledge. Human teachers bring a unique blend of empathy, intuition, and adaptability to the classroom. They establish meaningful connections with students, understand their emotional and developmental needs, and inspire creativity and critical thinking through personalized guidance and mentoring.

Now, lets examine the arguments from the other side. While they have made some strong points, it's crucial to consider their claims. they suggest that computers shouldn't replace teachers in the future because computers can't t cheer up negative emotions. But it is clear that this argument falls short because teachers sometimes make students afraid of school but computer is not. In the light of evidence provide, it is evident that our argument is more compelling.

And now let's go back to our argument of to support computers should replace teachers in the future.

Computer teaching is a creative and good way of teaching. Teachers may have some stress and may release anger to the students' heads, but computers don't. Computers even can answer the questions in many ways and make children
interested in learning. Base on PROVEN Robotics, there are 3 evidence provided. First, computers know everything so they can answer any question. Second, computers never get sick so schools will never need to find more teachers. And finally, computers can speak any language. So the computer can understand what any student anywhere is saying. Some people might say that computers can't remind students about transgress of rules, but however the school can still mount cameras and set rules.

In conclusion, our arguments stand strong and address the opposing side's points. It is clear that computers should replace teachers in the future. Lets keep pushing for the boundaries of knowledge to make a difference. Thank you so much for your attention.

Before we begin our argument, let's ensure we're on the same page. Computers are complex machines programmed to do various things like calculating and serving people in their everyday lives, some are known as AI or artificial intelligence. Teachers are people who help students learn by planning lessons, leading discussions, checking progress, and encouraging personal growth. Replacing means removing something and putting in something else instead of the previous item.

Our team firmly stands on the preposition that teachers shouldn't and will not be replaced by computers and now, let's come to my very first argument.

While computers excel at certain tasks like data processing and information retrieval, they lack the empathy, creativity, and intuition that human teachers possess. Teachers offer personalized guidance, emotional support, and mentorship that computers simply cannot replicate.

Furthermore, the dynamic nature of the learning environment necessitates human interaction and adaptability. Teachers can adjust their teaching methods based on individual student needs, provide real-time feedback, and create engaging learning experiences that cater to diverse learning styles. Dr. Linda Darling-Hammond, an education professor at Stanford University states, "Computers can provide information, and teachers can provide the human touch. When students are struggling, it's crucial to have a caring and knowledgeable teacher there to guide them through their learning journey. Computers may offer resources, but it is the teacher's guidance, encouragement, and support that truly makes a difference in a student's academic and personal growth." This viewpoint underscores the essential role that teachers play in education and highlights the limitations of computers in providing the nuanced support and mentorship that students need to thrive.

In conclusion, we've presented a compelling argument supported by evidence and logical reasoning. My argument stands strong. Thank you so much for your attention

2. How do you think the distribution and reception of the artwork should affect whether permission is needed?

3. Can you think of any other examples where artists have reimagined popular brands or characters? How were these works received?

4. What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of requiring artists to secure permission for their work?

Now, let’s examine the arguments from the other side. While they have made some strong points, it’s crucial to consider their claims. They suggested that computers should replace teacher. But it’s clear that this argument falls short because they don’t provide any evidence or examples. In light of the evidence provided, it is evident that our position is more compelling.

And now let’s go back to our argument to support computers shouldn’t replace teachers in the future.

First, teachers is far more than impacting knowledge and developing skills; it’s also helping students become more responsible ethical members of society. Teachers promote trust, honesty, and integrity in a classroom and server as role models for students to emulate.

Second, what if computers replace teachers in schools, there will be less fun, and more boredom to be had in the classroom.

Finally, what if the computer malfunction or stop working, if that happen students will play. The cost for repairing is very high and time-consuming.

In conclusion, our arguments stand strong and address the opposing side's points. Computers shouldn’t replace teachers in the future. Let’s keep pushing for the boundaries of knowledge to make a difference. Thank you so much for your attention.

our argument. Now let come to my argument.

Computer may not good in felling while human may not good at teaching but they know what the student felling and can take care of them. On the other hand Ai don't have felling, they can't help the student overcome their sadness. Let's imagine a children felling sad Ai just appease by don't cry or even stop cry because they don't have felling so the children felling lonely.

Second, next we will talk about the teaching. Ai is know as the artificial intelligence that made by human right?

So Ai is same as a human, but human can teach useful thing like advanced exercise even human can open lots of tops school as: Standford, Oxford, Harvard, Cambride, ...

nevertheless AI can't! Ai just teach the things they have and don't teach the advanced so children can not know the bigger thing.

Now as a last speaker I urge you t reflect on the weight of our position and the depth of our reasoning. Once more, we firmly stand here as the belive that we confuly disgree with the motion because of Ai doesn't have evidence and logiacal reasoning, felling and boundaries of knowledge. Thank you so much for your attention.

Chú ý: Các con cần làm đúng theo form cô hướng dẫn, cần phải có evidence, examples để support. Chỉ trừ phần rebuttal là các con bỏ qua. Không được lạm dụng chat GPT, sử dụng ngôn ngữ đơn giản dễ hiểu, thuyết phục.

DEADLINE: by 03/07/

Number 2: AI lack of creatives unlike teachers. AI just simply gives education and homeworks without any creatives and that can make students felt boring while studying while teachers creatives excited assignments, education and homework. Number 3: Students will not have any respect for the AI. The reason why students not have any respect for the AI teacher is because the AI dont have feelings so they can bully, swear at the teacher without any punishment and consequences. Number 4: Waste of energy and electricity. Having a AI teacher will make the electricity bill will go high and energy will ran out quickly because AI needs those resources to continue to teach the students. Thats my argument. Thanks for reading my argument!

Firstly, when flim makers change important details, the audience will get confused and especially children who doesnt know about the true event and will think that the movie is showing the true event and will never change their mind about the real one. Secondly, if flim makers dont change the important details, true stories and events will get more attention. According to Liam Gaughan, a based on a true event/story flim should show the audience how it happend, for example: 12 Years A Slave, the flim has successfully capture the essence of a true historical event and making millions people believe it.

Now once again, i disagree that flim makers changing important details in a based on a true story flim and with being said, thank you for your attention.

Getting facts right helps viewers learn the truth about events and people, promoting a deeper understanding of history.Changing details can disrespect the real people and events, altering their legacy and confusing audiences.Filmmakers have a duty to truthfully represent real events to avoid legal issues and uphold ethical standard. Sticking to facts builds trust with the audience, ensuring they can rely on the movie as a reliable source of information.

The film "Braveheart" (1995), while popular, was heavily criticized for its historical inaccuracies regarding the life of William Wallace and the events of the Scottish Wars of Independence.Let me give you a examples:The film faced criticism for glorifying Belfort's behavior and failing to adequately depict the victims of his financial crimes. Legal issues arose from individuals depicted in the film claiming misrepresentation and seeking damages.

Topic: Is Marcel Duchamp's Fountain Important for Modern Art?

Background: Marcel Duchamp's Fountain is a famous piece of art from 1917. It is a porcelain urinal signed "R. Mutt." Duchamp's work made people think differently about what art can be.

Task: Write a persuasive essay saying if you think Duchamp's Fountain is important for modern art or not.

1. Opening sentence:

   • Start with a sentence to catch the reader’s attention.

     Example:

     Start with a Question:

     • "Can a simple object like a urinal really be considered art?"

     • "What makes a piece of art truly revolutionary?"

     Begin with a Surprising Fact or Statement:

     • "In 1917, a urinal became one of the most controversial pieces of art."

     • "Marcel Duchamp shocked the world by presenting a urinal as art."

     Use an Interesting Quote:

     • "As Marcel Duchamp once said, 'Art is whatever you can get away with.'"

     • "A famous artist once claimed, 'Anything can be art.'"

     Make a Bold Claim:

     • "Duchamp's Fountain changed the art world forever."

     • "No other artwork has challenged the definition of art like Duchamp's Fountain."

     Describe a Scene or Scenario:

     • "Imagine walking into an art gallery and seeing a urinal on display."

     • "Picture an artist signing a urinal and calling it art. This is what Marcel Duchamp did."

     Use a Provocative Statement:

     • "What if art is not about beauty but about ideas?"

     • "Is it possible that a urinal can be more significant than a painting?"

     Begin with a Personal Opinion:

     • "I believe that Duchamp's Fountain is one of the most important artworks of the 20th century."

     • "In my opinion, Duchamp's Fountain redefined the boundaries of art."

     2. Write a few sentences about what Duchamp's Fountain is and why it is famous.

     3. Say clearly if you think Fountain is important or not.

     4.Compare "Fountain" with one of these recreations

     below:

     Fountain (Buddha) by Sherrie Levine: An artwork that reinterprets Duchamp's piece through a different cultural lens.

     Fractured Fountain by Mike Bidlo: A version that explores the deconstruction of Duchamp’s original idea.

     
     

Chú ý: Các con cần làm đúng theo form cô hướng dẫn, cần phải có evidence, examples để support. Chỉ trừ phần rebuttal là các con bỏ qua. Không được lạm dụng chat GPT, sử dụng ngôn ngữ đơn giản dễ hiểu, thuyết phục.

DEADLINE: by 11/07/2024

• Improved Living Standards: More people have access to basic necessities like clean water, sanitation, healthcare, and housing. This improves their quality of life and overall well-being.

• Community Support: Communities are coming together to support each other during difficult times. This includes helping neighbors, volunteering for charities, and advocating for positive changes.

• Cultural Exchange: Globalization has allowed people to learn about and appreciate different cultures and traditions. This cultural exchange enriches societies and promotes understanding and tolerance.

The distribution and reception of the artwork can indeed play a role in determining whether permission should be sought. If the artwork significantly benefits from or references a brand or character in a positive manner, obtaining permission may be necessary to maintain a good relationship with the brand owner and enhance the artwork's credibility. However, if the use is transformative, parody, or falls under fair use, this might not always be required.

MInh chau

Ultimately, it's crucial for artists to be mindful of copyright laws and ethical considerations when incorporating popular brands or characters into their work.

Duchamp's Fountain, created in 1917, is a famous artwork that caused major changes in how people perceive "art". Essentially a urinal presented as art forced people to question what defines art and who gets to decide.

Duchamp's Fountain is significant because it broke traditional rules about art. Duchamp made people think differently about creativity and originality by turning an ordinary object into art. The piece sparked discussions about the purpose of art and who gets to decide what is considered valuable in the art world.

I believe Duchamp's Fountain is crucial in art history because it challenged old ideas and paved the way for new ways of thinking about art. It inspires artists to push boundaries and explore unconventional forms of expression.

Comparing Duchamp's Fountain with Sherrie Levine's Fountain (Buddha) shows how artists can reinterpret and build upon each other's ideas. While Duchamp questioned the boundaries of art with his urinal, Levine added cultural significance by blending Duchamp's concept with symbolic meaning.

In summary, Duchamp's Fountain remains a key piece in art history for its ability to spark debates and redefine the meaning of art. Its impact on the art world continues to be felt today, encouraging artists and audiences to think outside the box and challenge traditional norms in artistic expression.

Before we begin our argument, let's ensure we're on the same page regarding the key terms in the motion. The world refers to planet Earth, everything living on it, and all human activities happening on Earth. Years are a time measurement unit consisting of 365 days and a quarter. Our team firmly stands on the proposition that the world has become better than in the past, and now let’s come to my very first argument.

In this rapidly evolving world, advancements in technology, science, and medicine have greatly improved our quality of life. The progress we have made in terms of healthcare, communication, and overall standards of living cannot be overstated. Medical breakthroughs have extended our lifespans, improved treatments for various illnesses, and enhanced overall well-being. Access to education, information, and opportunities has also increased significantly, empowering individuals across the globe to reach their full potential. The world today offers more opportunities for growth, prosperity, and equality than ever before. These advancements have undoubtedly contributed to making our world a better place for current and future generations.

In conclusion, we've presented a compelling argument supported by evidence and logical reasoning. Our argument stands strong. Thank you so much for your attention

Good morning, everyone. As the second speaker for the negative side. I am here to strengthen our argument and address the points made by the opposition.

Now, let’s examine the arguments from the other side. While they have made some strong points, it’s crucial to consider their claims. But it’s clear that this argument falls short because they don’t provide any evidence or examples. Considering the evidence provided, it is evident that our position is more compelling.

    And now let’s go back to our argument to support that Our world has become better compared to the past." How do we get here let’s go back in time when the stone age it start around 4,000 BC and 2,000 BC The Stone Age was a broad prehistoric period during which stone was widely used to make stone tools with an edge, a point, or a percussion surface. The period lasted for roughly 3.4 million years and ended between 4,000 BC and 2,000 BC, with the advent of metalworking. Let’s fast for a few years and reach the Middle Ages or medieval period lasted from approximately 500 to 1500 AD. It is the second of the three traditional divisions of Western history: antiquity, medieval, and modern. After that we reach the industrial revolution where the first vehicle that was built; there were more like Maritime technology where the Olympics was constructed the sister ship of the titanic. We will reach the modern period so things always change like us human we keep making and changing and nothing  can stop humanity.

In conclusion, our arguments stand strong and address the opposing side's points. Our world has become better compared to the past. Let’s keep pushing for the boundaries of knowledge to make a difference. Thank you so much for your attention.

judges opponents, and all members of the

audience. I am here to strengthen our argumen.

First let compare with the past. Around the BBC

people doesn't use computer or mobiphone or

electrical equipment. Until 1822 they was invited

the first electrical equipment. But have you ever

wonder that how they get to travel in the BBC.

They usually walk but if they lived near the

ocean or on a river, boats and ships were a major

way of travel. Up to the time of 1885 Gottlieb

Daimler and Wilhelm Mayach was invented the

first moterbike. One year latter Karl Benz have

invented the first car in the world. Now let example

if people in the past have becom better so people

may not trying to get a perfect socore or they don't

belive on them self and may not make the better

world. In con concluding Now, as the final speaker,

I urge you to reflect on the weight of our position

and the depth of our reasoning. Once more,

We firmly stand here as the belief that our world has

become better compare with the past because of all

the argument we have give above.As we move forward,

let's remember the importance of speaking up, staying

strong, and creating the change we wish to see.

Thank you for being a part of this journey with us.

like a fountain really be consider art? Marcel

Duchamp shocked the world by presenting a

urinal as art. Fountain in this case is not just

just an normal object for daily life, it an artwork

that famous all over the world. As the most of you

will think it a strangest think ever right? But it actully

was stolen by someone and until now they can't

not get it back yet. What in the world the person that

stole that fountain is? : said my little brother. Today

we have confront the question: Is Marcel Duchamp

fountain importance for modern art. =))

Vậy trả lời các câu hỏi sau:

1. Các bước đó là gì?

2. Các tips cho making a rebuttal là gì?

3. Áp dung đối với bài tập trong file đính kèm.

   DEADLINE: 18/07/2024

Chú ý: TẤT CẢ CÁC PHẦN CẦN ĐƯỢC ĐẦU TƯ TIME NGHIÊN CỨU, PHÂN TÍCH VÀ LÀM CHẤT LƯỢNG. NHỮNG BÀI COPY TỪ CÁC CHATBOT AI ĐỀU BỊ LOẠI, HOẶC NHỮNG BÀI LÀM SƠ SÀI. MAKE SURE LÀ CÁC CON THỰC SỰ HIỂU NHỮNG GÌ CÁC CON NÓI VÀ VIẾT.

Hướng dẫn:

Bước 1: Lựa chọn side cho mình, nó là positive hay negative.

Bước 2: Trình bày lập luận ra giấy hoặc đánh máy, phải follow đúng các bước cô dạy như đâu là argument, đâu là explanation, đâu là examples, và đừng quên counterargument.

Bước 3: Practice nội dung đã trình viết bên trên nhiều lần cho thành thạo

Bước 4: Quay video các con đứng và trình bày quan điểm của mình, chú ý body language, tông giọng.

DEALINE: THỨ 6 NGÀY 14/02

SHOULD WE ALLOW CHILDREN TO USE SOCIAL MEDIA?

Nhiệm vụ của các con tuần này là sẽ trình bày lập luận của mình một cách rõ ràng về motion "should children be allow to use social media?".

Chú ý: TẤT CẢ CÁC PHẦN CẦN ĐƯỢC ĐẦU TƯ TIME NGHIÊN CỨU, PHÂN TÍCH VÀ LÀM CHẤT LƯỢNG. NHỮNG BÀI COPY TỪ CÁC CHATBOT AI ĐỀU BỊ LOẠI, HOẶC NHỮNG BÀI LÀM SƠ SÀI. MAKE SURE LÀ CÁC CON THỰC SỰ HIỂU NHỮNG GÌ CÁC CON NÓI VÀ VIẾT.

Hướng dẫn:

Bước 1: Lựa chọn side cho mình, nó là positive hay negative.

Bước 2: Trình bày lập luận ra giấy hoặc đánh máy, phải follow đúng các bước cô dạy như đâu là argument, đâu là explanation, đâu là examples, và đừng quên counterargument.

Bước 3: Practice nội dung đã trình viết bên trên nhiều lần cho thành thạo

Bước 4: Quay video các con đứng và trình bày quan điểm của mình, chú ý body language, tông giọng.

DEALINE: THỨ 6 NGÀY 20/02/2025

💡 Chủ đề: Should people have plastic surgery?

Các con hãy quay video trình bày lại bài argument về chủ đề này mà mình đã thảo luận trên lớp. Tuy nhiên, cần bổ sung thêm các phần sau để bài nói hoàn thiện hơn:

✅ Example (Ví dụ cụ thể): Minh họa quan điểm bằng tình huống thực tế.
✅ Evidence (Bằng chứng): Đưa ra số liệu, nghiên cứu hoặc ý kiến từ chuyên gia để củng cố lập luận.
✅ Counterargument (Phản biện): Đề cập đến ý kiến trái chiều và phản biện lại.

⏳ Deadline: Thứ 5, ngày 13/10.

📹 Yêu cầu:

• Video rõ ràng, giọng nói to, dễ nghe.

• Nội dung chặt chẽ, có đầy đủ các phần đã yêu cầu.

• Độ dài tối thiểu 1 phút 30 giây.

🔥 Hãy thể hiện quan điểm của mình một cách thuyết phục nhé! 💪

🎬 Nhiệm vụ:
Các con hãy quay một video trình bày bài argument (lập luận) về chủ đề trên – đây là bài mà chúng ta đã cùng thảo luận trên lớp. Tuy nhiên, lần này các con cần phát triển bài nói đầy đủ và mạch lạc hơn theo phương pháp PEEL mà cô đã hướng dẫn, cụ thể gồm các phần:

1. Main Point – Nêu rõ quan điểm chính của con.

2. Explanation – Giải thích lý do tại sao con chọn quan điểm đó.

3. Evidence – Đưa ra ví dụ, số liệu, dẫn chứng cụ thể để làm rõ ý.

4. Link – Kết nối các ý trên để làm rõ lập luận của mình.

5. Counterargument – Phản biện một ý kiến trái chiều, sau đó bác bỏ hoặc làm rõ lại quan điểm của con.

6. Conclusion – Kết luận, nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình một lần nữa.

🎤 Yêu cầu về video:

• Giọng nói rõ ràng, to, dễ nghe.

• Nội dung mạch lạc, đầy đủ các phần theo yêu cầu.

• Thời lượng tối thiểu: 2 phút.

✅ Yêu cầu:

1. Chuẩn bị bài nói theo quan điểm được phân công (ủng hộ hoặc phản đối).

2. Quay video bài nói, độ dài khoảng 2–3 phút.

3. Bài nói cần có:
    – Quan điểm rõ ràng
    – Lập luận hợp lý
    – Ví dụ minh họa
    – Phản biện ngắn gọn với ý kiến đối lập

📥 Gửi video đúng hạn để cô nhận xét và góp ý trước khi luyện tập trên lớp.

✅ Yêu cầu:

1. Chuẩn bị bài nói theo quan điểm được phân công (ủng hộ hoặc phản đối).

2. Quay video bài nói, độ dài khoảng 2–3 phút.

3. Bài nói cần có:
    – Quan điểm rõ ràng
    – Lập luận hợp lý
    – Ví dụ minh họa
    – Phản biện ngắn gọn với ý kiến đối lập.

✅ Yêu cầu:

1. Chuẩn bị bài nói theo quan điểm được phân công: ủng hộ hoặc phản đối.

2. Quay video bài nói, độ dài từ 2–3 phút.

3. Bài nói cần đảm bảo các yếu tố sau:

   • Trình bày quan điểm rõ ràng

   • Có lập luận hợp lý, mạch lạc

   • Có ví dụ minh họa cụ thể

   • Phản biện ngắn gọn với ý kiến trái chiều

🎥 Hãy chuẩn bị kỹ nội dung, luyện tập trước khi quay để bài nói trôi chảy và tự nhiên nhất nhé!