<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>New Criticism  by Noor Alhoda Al.Amawi</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5</link>
      <description>Summary</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-04-18 15:45:49 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-04-18 15:45:50 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>201031221</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821500</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-For Brooks, the language of poetry is the language of Paradox.&nbsp;<br>-For Wimsatt, Metaphor is the structure most characteristic of concentrated poetry.</div><div><br></div><div>-The characteristic unity of a poem lies in the unification of&nbsp; the tensions it creates through the use of:</div><div>&nbsp; &nbsp;•Propositions.</div><div>&nbsp; &nbsp;•Metaphors.</div><div>&nbsp; &nbsp;•Symbols.</div><div>&nbsp; &nbsp;•Paradoxes.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-04-18 15:45:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821500</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>201031221</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821501</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The New Critics stress on:&nbsp;</div><div>•Paradox.</div><div>•Metaphor.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-04-18 15:45:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821501</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>201031221</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821502</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>Wimsatt and Beardsley warned critics of the danger of Intentional Fallacy.</li><li>In modern poetry, Brooks speaks of the need for critical revolution of the order of the Romantic Revolt.&nbsp;</li><li>Revolt is necessary because of the difficulty of modern poets, such as Yeats, Eliot, Frost, Anden, And MacLeish.&nbsp;</li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-04-18 15:45:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821502</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>201031221</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821503</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The main figures associated with the New Criticism were:&nbsp;</div><div>•John Ranson.</div><div>•Allen Tate:</div><div>•Cleanth Brooks.</div><div>•Kenneth Burke.</div><div>•William Wimsatt.</div><div><br></div><ul><li>New Criticism was a reaction to the historical-philological approach to literature that was in American universities. Its main concern was to establish the irreducibility of the literary text, the poem in particular.&nbsp;</li><li>The poem is treated as: a self-contained and self-sustaining unit if meaning, which doesn’t have to be explained in terms of its author’s personality or biography.&nbsp;</li><li>Therefore, the task is to examine what the poem says as a poem.&nbsp;</li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-04-18 15:45:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821503</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>201031221</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821505</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>The whole goal is to find a pattern (certain tensions and ambiguities), which leads us to a theme.&nbsp;</li><li>The goal of theme is to lead to Unity.</li><li>At the end we come to a unified meaning (theme).</li><li>The GOAL of the New Criticism is to get to a unified meaning.</li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li>The Role of the Author:</li></ul><div>For centuries, the ultimate authority on a text was the author BUT new critics rejected this, they called that “The Intentional Fallacy”: it doesn’t matter what the author intends. The text itself is the final authority, not the author.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-04-18 15:45:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821505</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>201031221</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821506</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>Critics believed that interpretation lives in Tension (In order to make sense, we should interpret certain things/texts ironically.&nbsp;</li><li>Irony isn’t a step that new critics will always hit, but sometimes it’s one of the ways that they resolve contradictions.</li><li>If we have different symbols, then one of them is ironic (which means one of them is not a literal message).</li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-04-18 15:45:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821506</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>201031221</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821507</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>New criticism starts with looking for symbols (all texts have symbols and ideals that aren’t literal).&nbsp;</li><li>We should interpret these symbols.</li><li>We might have more than one possible meaning.</li><li>Symbols lead to Paradox (one symbol has two or more meanings, which is strange).&nbsp;</li><li>Paradox leads to Ambiguity&gt;&gt;contradictions&gt;&gt;something unclear in the text (confusing).</li><li>Ambiguity leads to Tension (competing ideas that need interpretation).</li><li>If we have two separate meanings for the same idea in a text, we need to figure out how to tackle that by making our own interpretation (this happens after we identify the symbols, paradox, and ambiguity).</li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-04-18 15:45:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821507</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>201031221</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821509</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>Literary Criticism is the way we read literature. It’s different based on sort of the philosophy behind why or how we read.&nbsp;</li><li>Different people pay attention for different things.</li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-04-18 15:45:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/201031221/6cg1xqwk5wscwia5/wish/2558821509</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
