https://padlet.com/claytonms/6b70e6hzrjvz en-us 2019-04-29 13:06:02 UTC 2019-04-29 14:05:10 UTC hello@padlet.com claytonms https://padlet.com/claytonms/6b70e6hzrjvz/wish/354992915 Notes:
- Proponents of net neutrality believe that network providers should be require to treat all broadband some consumers equally instead of charging some consumers higher prices for using more bandwidth (data-carrying capacity).
- Opponents of net neutrality question whether cable and telephone companies could afford to invest in advanced security or transmission services if they could not charge a premium for them.

https://www.britannica.com/technology/Internet-service-provider#ref1072653]]> 2019-04-29 13:11:47 UTC https://padlet.com/claytonms/6b70e6hzrjvz/wish/354992915 claytonms https://padlet.com/claytonms/6b70e6hzrjvz/wish/355000188 Notes:
-In 2017, the US Federal Communications Commission voted to scrap net neutrality rules.
- These regulations had barred firms such as giant Comcast Corp. and wireless carrier AT&T from blocking any content or singling out any offering for a quicker or slower delivery
-FCC did leave in place a provision requiring companies to disclose any disparate treatment.
-In 2015, the European Union introduced measures requiring that Internet companies handle all traffic equally.
-India's 2016 rule prevent service providers from charging different rats for different types of content.
-Tim Wu proposes that internet providers be allowed to recoup their costs .y charging consumers rather than producers of websites.
- Customer would pay based on the speed of their internet connection and would be able to access all material available online at the same delivery rate.
-The FCC adopted Wu's ideas in 2005, but its subsequent enforcement attempts were blocked by courts- "lacked requisite regulatory authority."
-2015 rules fixed that by applying to the internet the same legal authority that underpins regulation of public utilities. (those rules have been overturned).
Advocates of minimal oversight argue that it will encourage more internet providers to enter the market, driving down prices for consumes.
-The providers themselves say that they should be able to charge websites to offset the huge costs of expanding networks to convey their data.
-Under the new rules, service providers will still be policed for anticompetitive behavior, by the Federal Trade Commission. (find out new rules)
- Advocates of the new rules say internet providers can expand faster if websites effectively share the costs.
- Opponents argue that providers will increasingly focus on urban areas, since content providers are more likely to pay for access to high-density, higher-profit markets.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/net-neutrality/2018/06/25/18013314-782e-11e8-ac4e-421ef7165923_story.html?utm_term=.12d98cd8c7cb]]> 2019-04-29 13:26:56 UTC https://padlet.com/claytonms/6b70e6hzrjvz/wish/355000188 claytonms https://padlet.com/claytonms/6b70e6hzrjvz/wish/355011842 -Popular online content providers such as Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft would like to maintain the status quo, which they claim would preserve the egalitarian philosophy on which the Internet was founded.
-for the gutting of net neutrality free-market adherents, telecom companies, and most Republicans.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23015624.pdf?ab_segments=0%2Fdefault-2%2Fcontrol&refreqid=search%3A30757967439dfbc9901c69b56007b313]]> 2019-04-29 13:50:17 UTC https://padlet.com/claytonms/6b70e6hzrjvz/wish/355011842