https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1 en-us 2020-11-20 17:19:23 UTC 2020-11-20 18:35:32 UTC hello@padlet.com hlomin0736 https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946239711 Chief Justice: Roger B. Taney (pictured below)
Associate Justices:
John McLean
James M. Wayne
John Catron
Peter V. Daniel
Samuel Nelson
Robert C. Grier
Benjamin R. Curtis
John A. Campbell]]> 2020-11-20 17:25:46 UTC https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946239711 hlomin0736 https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946303531 -Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri
-He then lived in Illinois(part of the Louisiana Territory) where slavery was forbidden by the 1820 Missouri Compromise (Pictured Below)
-Scott attempted to come back to Missouri and file a suit claiming "his residence in free territory made him a free man."
-He lost the suit and took it to federal court after his previous master claimed "no 'negro' or descendant of slaves could be a citizen in the sense of Article III of the Constitution"]]> 2020-11-20 17:39:25 UTC https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946303531 hlomin0736 https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946391492 Court: Missouri Supreme Court (Pictured Below)
Decision: Dred Scott and his family were enslaved again]]> 2020-11-20 17:58:21 UTC https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946391492 hlomin0736 https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946420759 Petitioner:
- A slave who's ancestors brought to the U.S. as slaves can't be labeled a citizen by states within the Constitution
- A slave does not have the rights of citizens and can't sue in court
-  Public opinion can't sway the written constitution
Respondent:
- Because he resided in Illinois, he gained the rights of a citizen
- Because he gained the rights of a citizen he is legally allowed to sue in court
- They must reverse the court below them before turning down the case]]> 2020-11-20 18:04:44 UTC https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946420759 hlomin0736 https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946485625 Was Dred Scott free or slave?
Decision & Opinion Of The Court: "Held portions of the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional in violation of the Fifth Amendment, treating Scott as property, not as a person"]]> 2020-11-20 18:18:41 UTC https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946485625 hlomin0736 https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946506360 Concurrence: Samuel Nelson &
Robert Cooper Grier- Had same conclusion as Taney, but his views were based on the merit of the case

Dissent: Benjamin Robbins Curtis- Curtis held that "invalidating the Missouri Compromise was not necessary to resolving the case."]]> 2020-11-20 18:23:13 UTC https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946506360 hlomin0736 https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946528962 This is an example of Judicial Restraint because the judge was not as powerful and Dred Scott was still ruled a slave.]]> 2020-11-20 18:28:12 UTC https://padlet.com/hlomin0736/61rnmcfna0yo7ho1/wish/946528962