<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Land Law Seminar 10 Group 5 by Samantha Jayne Roberts</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2020-12-14 10:39:48 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-01-06 09:39:56 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45/wish/1015445900</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the benefit of a covenant will run with the land if;<br>1- covenantee has a legal estate in land<br>2- the covenant touches and concerns the land of the covenantee <br>Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd v. River Douglas Catchment Board.<br>3- the benefit of the covanent is intended to run with the land, under s.78 LPA 1925<br> </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-12-14 10:48:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45/wish/1015445900</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>According to Austerberry v Corporation of Oldham 1885, generally burden does not pass at Law. </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45/wish/1015460390</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>However, there are exceptions. <br>1- Chain of indemnity <br>2- Mutual benefit and burder <br>Halsall v Brizell states that cannot take benefit unless accept related burdens. <br>3- enlargements of long leases into freeholds <br>s.153 LPA 1925<br>4- Estate Rentcharges .</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-12-14 10:56:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45/wish/1015460390</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>In order for burden to pass in equity, Tulk v Moxhay conditions must be statisfied</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45/wish/1015473567</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1-covenant must be restrictive <br>2- Covenant must touch and concern the land of covenantee <br>Re Ballards conveyences <br>3- Covenantee's land must be capable of benefiting from covanent <br>London County council V Allen <br>4- Burden of covenant must be intended to run with the land <br>s.79(1) LPA 1925 </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-12-14 11:03:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45/wish/1015473567</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45/wish/1015489853</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>in order for the benefit to pass in equity <br>the covenant has to touch and concern the land of the covenantee and the benefit of the covenant must intend to run with the land either by; <br>1- express or implied annexation <br>by statutory annexation under s.78 LPA 1925<br>2- Express or implied assignment <br>under a scheme of developments/ Building scheme<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-12-14 11:12:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45/wish/1015489853</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>which are laid down in Elliston v Reacher </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45/wish/1015500180</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-12-14 11:18:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sroberts292/619toznux5297v45/wish/1015500180</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
