To combat/fight/tackle global warming

The emission of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere

The burning of fossil fuels releases large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which leads to global warming. Fossil fuels are coal, gas and oil.

Greenhouse gases are the leading cause of climate change.

Solutions: 

Using renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power will assist in the fight against climate change.

To install solar batteries on the roofs of buildings

To build wind farms

Planting more trees as trees absorb carbon dioxide.

To reduce the carbon footprint of a factory

businesses that are committed to reducing their carbon footprint

Problem 1. Greenhouse gases

There are fewer trees to produce oxygen and absorb carbon dioxide.

Deforestation is contributing to global warming because trees absorb carbon dioxide.

Problem 2. Endangered species

When forests are cut down, the plants and animals that live in the forests are destroyed, and some species are at risk of being made extinct, bacuse they lose their habitats.

Causes:

n   People cut down forests to build cities or clear land for agricultural use.

Solutions:

To preserve the remaining forests, humans should simply stop cutting down trees.

Forests are in major need of preservation.  For every tree that is cut down, a new one needs to be planted in its place.

A type of plant or animal that might stop existing

Common vocabulary

species of fish, animals, birds

flora and fauna – plants and animals

extinct ( no longer existing)

One out of every ten plant and animal species is expected to become/go extinct by 2050.

almost/nearly extinct

critically endangered species

The levels of biodiversity across the world have significantly decreased in the last three decades.

Causes

Lost habitats mean losing the species that live there. (deforestation)

With the rising temperatures of the Arctic, sea ice melts, which eliminates the habitat of polar bears and various other animals. (global warming)

n   Many species of plants and animals have become extinct due to human activity.

n   Wild animals are being poached on a massive scale, with millions of individual animals worldwide killed or captured illegally.

to poach – to hunt illegally

Solutions

n   Save/protect endangered species

n   Focus on wildlife conservation – protect wildlife habitats by controlling pollution and creating nature reserves

n   Stop deforestation

n   Limit green gas emissions

n   Support organizations dedicated to fighting species extinction

To pollute air/water/soil/the environment

Contamination - the process or fact of making a place dirty by adding a substance that is dangerous or carries disease.

Environmental contamination resulting from human activities is a major health concern.

Contaminated waters are undrinkable.

Polluted air causes health problems.

Contaminated soil destroys habitats. (endangered species)

Most major cities suffer from dangerous levels of air pollution.

People who live in areas with high levels of air pollution are more likely to die from cancer or other diseases.

poor air quality

Good air quality is essential for our health, quality of life and the environment.

Causes:

n   Most air pollution is the result of combustion of fossil fuels to generate power and heat, and to power vehicles.

n   Power stations, factories, and vehicles emit harmful gases into the atmosphere.

n   Emissions from car exhausts cause pollution around cities.

Solutions:

Cut/reduce/limit emissions

n   The most basic solution for air pollution is to end its root cause and move away from fossil fuels, replacing them with clean, renewable energy.

renewable energy = alternative energy: solar, wind and geothermal energy

Shifting to electric vehicles and promoting public transport could reduce air pollution.

n   It is important to conserve energy because sources of energy such as electricity, diesel, gasoline, and wood contribute to air pollution.

Definitions

a landfill - an area of land where large amounts of waste are buried under the earth

Causes

factories that empty toxic waste into rivers and oceans

The dumping of toxic waste has contaminated the area.

Most plastics do not biodegrade which means no natural process can break them down.

Plastics are littering cities, oceans, and waterways, contributing to health problems in humans and animals.

Plastic is often dumped in the ocean where it is consumed by wildlife.

Solutions:

n   Recycle plastic

n   Use biodegradable packaging in supermarkets

n   Limit the production of single-use plastic

Sustainable growth, sustainable development, sustainable communities, sustainable communities, sustainable energy sources

Renewable energy: energy that is produced using natural resources such as the wind, sun, etc.

Reduced the impact on the environment

Environmentally friendly: behavior and products that do not harm the environment

Environmentally friendly products / businesses / practices / technologies

To preserve the environment for future generations

A. The youth should get involved in <tackling environmental problem>

B. The punishment for <causing environmental problem> should be made more strict.

C. Countries should cooperate in the fight against <environmental problem>

You can write about ANY environmental problem

Because the overproduction of industiral goods, it will deplete the natrual resources and then make deforestaion.,fewer trees can produce oxygen,so too much absorb carbon dioxide will damage people's health.Also,deforestation means the habitat of endangered species will be reduced,so more and more endangered species lose their home and finally die.

For youth ,although they can not to directly affect the production of industial goods and stop the production, they can help to plant some trees ,also ,they can learn more about how to protect the endangered species, call more people to participate into the protection of environment, it is also very helpful.

If there only adults to get involved to protect enviroment, although it can solve environmental problems, it can not be sustainable, so it is very important to let youth know how to solve environmental problems ,so that to build a environmental firendly world

There are two reasons to support my view. Firstly, youth have many new ideal to deal with this kind of problem, they can use internet, AI and so on to protect the environment and also can use many interesting slogan and post to increase the public awareness about the environment.

Secondly, young people are an important part of society and they often contribute to promoting social development. Not only that, they will act as parents and pass on their environmental awareness to the next generation of children.

For example, young people can create products that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions; Or participate as policymakers and activists in the development of national conservation measures.

as the technology development the solution is really horroble nowadays , for example some industry may emit a lot of pollution it will lead a really negative production externality . ignorer to maximum the social optimal ,it is a good idea for the government to set the level of tax for the industry's that the firm could be limited there production and less pollution fed the whole society,however there are also some drawbacks for this policy, because it is depend on the people reaction, maybe they have high motive to produce although the cost is extremely high for them.

Nowadays, A large amount of bio habitats are damaged without any preservation .However, these endangered species contain great value to the biotechnology and they should not be extinction without analysis. A lot of people do not realise that biochemicals such as penicillin ,a medicine , are extracted from endangered plants .Moreover, Almost all these species are found among plenty of countries ,therefore, the cooperated protection by numerical countries is necessary .Only if all the countries combat the problem together , the species can be conserved to bring out their whole value. Maybe the next endangered species we save containing the critical chemical to treat cancer .

Countries should cooperate in the fight against <environmental problem>.

Nowadays the world is facing more and more environmental problems that are experienced by almost every country. And normally these problems are hard to tackle by the power of a single country. For example, the pollution of water and the shortage of foods and water. If the whole world worked together to fight against these problems, the developed countries can learn from others actual experiences and the developing countries can help other weaker countries and take their responsibility to solve the severe problems like the sea pollution.

The basis of means of punishments is supervision department, following penalties including fines, education and detention should be performed according to legislation.

Although government will suffer more opportunity costs, the long run benefits generated by this implementation would be significant. In details, behaviors like overcutting trees which reduces oxygen, overfishing which destroy ecological equilibrium and excess land reclamation which diminish the soil fertility will be effectively restricted, then, after a period of time, if the censorship done work effectively, ecosystem will be recovered.

For example, people who litter on the street should be fined. Furthermore, the government should give these industries permission to discharge, and if they exceed the limits, they should be fined, and even the managers involved may get into the prison.

it is widely known that our environment is becoming more and more unfavourable. Some environmental problems cannot be ignored ,namely global warming, loss of biodiversity and plastics pollution, which have imposed a threat to human beings. Everyone around the world is obliged to do somethings to protect our Earth including the young generation. Even if there are some values and facts they don’t know, they have their own thoughts and they can control themselves to do some simple works like conserve water,Reduce Wast and use Green Transportation. Apart from that, school and society are required increase students’ awareness about the current environmental problems.

some laws to make the punishment for causing

environment problem more strict due to the worse

situation of the environment. although some

people know the harm and dangerous they still did

to get a high return so it is necessary to be more strict

of the punishment.

environmental problem> should be

made more strict .I have the following two reasons. First, severe punishment measures can improve the efficiency of environmental government, because firms and individuals will pay more attention to be careful with environmental regulations in order to avoid punishment, reducing the management costs of environmental management departments. Secondly, harsher punishment often lead to better results. Therefore, public health will be improved, clean water and air can better protect the health of children and the elderly, save medical resources, and use medical resources more on people in need.

Comparing with solving environmental issues in a large scale, spending money on local problems is more urgent and realistic. Above all, local problems exert a more direct impact on the life quality of local people. Global warming may increase the temperature in several seasons, but polluted air and contaminated water could cause serious diseases or even a pademic among residents. Also, these issues are easier to be solved. For example, in order to ameliorate the water quality in a river, the government may just needs to shut down some factories at the upper reaches. In comparison, addressing issues like global warming needs international and long-term cooperation, which is quite costly and requires a considerable amount of time.

On the other hand, these two types of problems are not mutually exclusive. Measurements to improve the local environment, such as planting trees and develop ecofriendly industries, can also help deal with global problems. Furthermore, the government can accumulate experience in the process of solving local issues. When facing global problems, the authority will be able to come up with solutions that better balance the need for environmental protection and economic growth. In addition, during the international negotiation to solve global problems, governments which have successfully dealt with issues in their own countries would be more convincing when they have the floor.

In conclusion, although global environmental issues are indeed threatening, I believe that investing in solving problems that affect the local environment is a more rational choice for the government.

Having written though, reducing the amount of money in dealing local environment issues is not a appropriate idea, since these relatively small problems can be extremely severe without control. Deforestation of the local area, for example, will results the less absorption of carbon dioxide, which will further cause global warming which is considered as a more threatening issue. Therefore, to solve the root problem, government should spend a lot money in planting trees and setting forest preservation area. Apart from that, putting a considerable money in recycling the polluted air and finding a more environment-friendly way to replace the use of car not only helps solve the poor air quantity, but also improve the health condition of residents, avoiding the more detrimental causes to the environment and on human.

To sum up, i strongly agree that the government should increase the money spent on some more problems that are more difficult to deal with, however, they shouldn’t cut the financing of the other less important enviornment issues.

The funding into national environmental problems further lower than most of people’s expectation basically. For the most of state governments, of course, they have sufferred or even sufferring some extremely serious incidents. The sum of the area of forest that have caught fire in Australia and China is larger than the territory of many countries. The fire not only killed plenty of wild animals, plants and residents, but also produced a large amount of toxic gases and carbon dioxide. So what? someone may ask. However, if the lifes of your family members and best friends were in the great danger, you would hope your taxes to paid on ‘high level research’ ? Totally, I trust that if you want to do more effort on worldwide environmental problems, you are supposed to cope with the the national problems firstly.

The stability of locals is the foundation of the increase of finance into further researches. If the residents are at the edge of survival line, no one will concern about global issues no matter how urgent it is. For instance, the government could only receive few coins from refugee but need to pay more on their daily life. So, for those who support to pay more attention on global warming treatment, they may just not live in the area that experiences extreme weather every year.

Totally, I trust that if you want to do more effort on worldwide environmental problems, you are supposed to cope with the the national problems firstly.

Granted, some people contend that urgent and universal issues, such as global warming, always result in a more threatening consequence, like rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and biodiversity loss, causing severe damage to the planet and future generations. Therefore, it is essential for governments to contribute to global efforts in mitigating climate change through transferring investment in addressing regional problems to universal ones.

However, what they are ignoring is that it is zonal environmental issues have a direct impact on the quality of life and health of citizens. For instance, polluted air and contaminated water can lead to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, respectively. As a result, it is crucial for governments to allocate sufficient funds for addressing these issues. Moreover, zonal environmental problems can also have economic implications, such as lack of agricultural productivity and tourism revenue. By investing in regional environmental conservation, governments can ensure sustainable development and protect the well-being of their citizens.

In conclusion, I concede that higher funding in universal problems may produce specific upsides. Nevertheless, if we neglect the significance of solving zonal issues by investing, that will surely generate even more downsides. On balance, governments should strike a balance between funding for local and global environmental issues, ensuring that both are adequately addressed.