It is explicitly observed that capacity-based classes exert a direct positive influence on learning outcomes. First and foremost, studying in the streamed classes students are able to encourage and support together in order to seek out the best solutions for complex tasks, this means they can achieve enormous lessons and get more knowledge. For instance, Vietnam where almost all schools would like to separate classes according to student ability so as to be easy to teach. Significantly, one of the main advantages of grouping children by ability is that pupils do not stop on the same theme for certain times because they are being taught at a pace that suits their own level. 

Notwithstanding, there are some obstacles which have an impact on children. Initially, these trends make significant drawbacks related to their soft skills such as communication with different people, this causes them to not achieve a bright future career. Subsequently, there is a high risk of wrongly dividing pupils into classes because some youngsters define their interest in the high school, this leads to a situation when teenagers do not realize what to do in the future, consequently they have to take a gap year to find out the field of their interests. As an illustration, in the US a huge number of young people have to take a gap year to do some things which they are interested in. 

By and large, there is no doubt that grouping classes play a crucial role in assisting students gain knowledge. Nevertheless, due to some of its limitations, it is suggested that mixed classes should be considered to balance and get over

One of the most noticeable drawbacks in teaching students in classes based on the ability at a young age in the unequal distribution in the understanding of the children in various subjects. As they are only taught subjects that match their ability to fully understand and develop, the students’ knowledge of the remaining subjects will be blank. The result of this situation is that students will lack of necessary things that will be applied to their majors in the future. Also, being separated into classes based on skills can become a threatening situation for students since there will be a major that has the number of students outrange the others. This can lead to school violence with the victims are children from less popular class and the bullies are children from highly popular classes. An example for the disadvantages is that a huge number of students in a secondary have failed while taking tests in order to choose the suitable highschools for them. This is due to the fact that they are lack of knowledge in respective majors, making them unable to pass the test.

On the contrary, having streaming students can be beneficial in some facets, as the main advantage is to discover and develop the students’ abilities in different subjects, thus helping them to take advantage of their majors in competitions. Moreover, when the children focus in researching their abilities, they will learn how to use it to normal lives, making their lives more convinient. Nevertheless, the pros of streaming children into classes cannot overweigh the disadvantages due to the facts that it still leaves consequences on children’s future.

To conclude, while separating children due to their abilities can bring back advantages, people need to be concerned on the impacts that it causes on students’ future as it is an essential part. 

A very important award of being streamed in classes according to ability is that every secondary student has the opportunity to learn the right level curriculum, which develops a better own orientation in study and career. One another strong point of studying in a suitable class that fits children’s potential is making friends with peers with similar capabilities, to be motivated and reduce the stress of the ability gap in most mixed-ability classes. To illustrate this case, some research in Hanoi pointed out that students in some secondary schools which have been organizing based-ability classes for several years achieved higher prizes in national and international competitions compared to pupils in regular secondary schools.

On the other hand, arranging students to study in classes that best fit their ability to study causes many challenges to the government and schools, due to the fact that it takes a long-term period to rebuild a general national education system, including curriculum, the quality of teachers and several based-ability examinations. Fortunately, Vietnam has slowly changed its direction and purpose in teaching children these years, regarded by making some new selections of books based on a variety of hardness.

Parents and governments still need to consider and balance the benefits and drawbacks of this situation, but on the whole, I believe that students are always in the priority places and have to be educated to their suitable potential.

One strong point of streaming children in one group is they could be taught at the same pace that may suit their level efficiently. In other words, children could catch up each lesson more easily than those in mixed-ability classes. Furthermore, this could lead to one’s confidence and self-esteem because they may not have the feelings of being nervous by losing to other students. As a result, many students in streamed classes finish the courses without challenges.

On the other hand, one primary weakness of grouping children is they could have no competition amongst students and might potentially lose motivation to ameliorate themselves. Studying in the same level could contribute to the laziness and lack of stimulation because they have no achievement or target to reach. Moreover, they could not prepare to encounter the real world and easily get depressed while students in mixed classes get ready for this earlier. An example of this is many students attending to college certainly give up as they can not tolerate the pressure of competition.

In conclusion, although secondary students should be streamed in classes according to ability, I still determinedly believe that this leads to more detrimental effects on children than the benefits.