3E3 Intro to Inference (Basic + Supporter) by Priscilla Lee

priscillalwh — 2023-01-29 08:00:44 UTC

[Template:] Name: ___(Ms Lee)____

Point: The writer is/is not a supporter of NS because ___________________________________________________________.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Explanation: This shows that_________________________________.

priscillalwh — 2023-01-29 08:03:18 UTC

[Template:] Name: ___(Ms Lee)____

This picture tells me that the meme creator feels __________________ about the GST increase, because _____________________________________________________.

priscillalwh — 2023-01-29 08:06:44 UTC

[Template:] Name: ___(Ms Lee)____

Point: The cartoonist is/is not a supporter of GST because ___________________________________________________________.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Explanation: This shows that_________________________________.

Jervin and Nashwan

2023-02-07 06:09:02 UTC

This pictures tell me that the meme creator feels sad about the GST increase, because he used a picture of a crying man.

Name: Goh Shuang & Aliff

goh_shuang — 2023-02-07 06:09:03 UTC

This picture tells me that the meme creator feels sad about the GST increase, because he will have to pay more for his daily needs.

Name: Fuchao

2023-02-07 06:09:36 UTC

This picture tells me that the meme creator feels devastated about the GST increase, because he uses a picture of a crying man in the meme

Daniel n Mai

2023-02-07 06:10:00 UTC

This picture tells me that the meme creator feels sad about the GST increase because the picture used was a man crying.

Name: Sir Dr Harry Wang Zijie XVIII and Hao

2023-02-07 06:10:02 UTC

This picture tells me that the meme creator feels unhappy about the gst increase, because "everything is going to cost more now" This shows from the fact that the man is crying

Josue and Seng In ;-;

2023-02-07 06:10:13 UTC

This is picture that the meme creator feels sad worried and has strong feelings about the GST increase, because products would cost more than usual than before in terms of being more expensive :<

Name: Youming and Siti

2023-02-07 06:10:27 UTC

This picture tells me that the meme creator feels sad about the GST increase, because everything will cost more from then.

Name: Kishore & Ao Wen

2023-02-07 06:10:28 UTC

this picture tells me that the meme creator feels not pleased/ unsatisfied about the GST increase, because everything is going to cost more.

Dom & Jia De

2023-02-07 06:10:31 UTC

This tells me that the meme creator feels disappointed about the GST increase mainly because GST increase would increase our daily expenses thus managing expenses with a small income or with a minimum wage would be more difficult.

Riyaz,Ariana

2023-02-07 06:10:33 UTC

the picture tells me that the meme creator feels worried about the GST increase, because the prices will be more expensive and more must be spent.

Name: Kilien and Lukas

2023-02-07 06:11:10 UTC

This picture tells me that the meme creator feels worried about the GST increase, because everything bought is going to cost more now

Hannah and denise🤑💯

2023-02-07 06:11:11 UTC

This picture tells me that the meme creator feels distress about the GST increase, because it means that things like clothing and basic needs would be more costly

Name: Chloe and Dharchini

2023-02-07 06:11:16 UTC

This picture tells me that the meme creator feels distressed and worried as he put a picture of a man that is crying about the GST increase, because many items would now become costly and expensive, and may be unaffordable for many.

Zh and Lucien

2023-02-07 06:11:36 UTC

This picture tells me that the meme creator feels upset about the GST increase, because the meme shows the picture of somebody having tears running down their face and the speech bubble also stated "Everything is going to costr more"

Aviel & Felice

2023-02-07 06:11:51 UTC

I can infer from this picture that the meme creator feels upset about the GST increase, because this would cause the prices of items to become more expensive.

Name: Venus and Tristan

2023-02-07 06:14:34 UTC

The picture tells me that the meme creator feels depressed about the GST increase , because the creator needs pay for more for his necessary goods

Harry Wang Zijie XVIII

2023-02-07 06:27:02 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because he shows that it benefits Singapore Citizens. This is evident from the source, which shows that the man benefits from CPF years later to pay his medical bills when he was fuming about it just a few years before. This shows that the cartoonists wants to show the good effects of CPF.

Hannah

2023-02-07 06:30:37 UTC

Point: The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because he is able to receive money from his CPF every month to help pay for his needs

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that the man is smiling and saying "Phew! thanks to CPF, I now have a monthly retirement income to help me pay my medical bills"

Explanation: This shows that the cartoonist is supportive of CPF as he can feel at ease as he is able to enjoy his retirement years because of the money he receives monthly. He does not have to worry about not having money to buy daily necessities

Name: Venus

2023-02-07 06:31:05 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because in the second panel of the cartoon, the old man looks happy because he has CPF to pay for his medical bills.
This is evident from the source which shows that even though the man was angry about CPF taking away part of his salary, years later when he turned old and retired, he feels relieved that he is able to pay his medical bills from his CPF.
This shows that CPF would help the elders who retired to be able to afford necessities and pay their bills even without a monthly income. It would reduce their burdens.

felice

2023-02-07 06:31:09 UTC

point: the cartoonist is a supporter of CPF to help him pay for his needs every month
evid: this is evident from the source in the second panel which shows that the cartoonist looks relieved that he has a monthly retirement income to help him pay his medical bills
explanation: This shows that the cartoonist agrees with the decision of the government implying CPF and that it helps with old peoples troubles in earning money

amron

2023-02-07 06:31:21 UTC

The cartoonist isnt a supoorter of CPf because he is joking about it in the source.
tthis is eveident because the frist frame shows the man grumbling about how his money goes to cpf but in the secondframe he is grateful.
This shows that cpf screws you over before retiremnt and only helps you afyer.

Lucien

2023-02-07 06:31:54 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because he appreciates receiving monthly retirement fund after he has retired from working.
This is evident from the source, which shows that he is smiling happily upon receiving his monthly retirement fund. He also says, "Thanks to CPF, I now have a monthly retirement income to help me pay my medical bills."
This shows that the cartoonist is supportive of CPF as he is able to receive a monthly income after retirement to pay for his medical bills and personal use.

Name: Chloe

2023-02-07 06:31:57 UTC

Point: The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because in the cartoon it shows that when the man was older he was relieved that he had CPF which provided income to pay to for his medical bills.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that "Phew! Thanks to CPF, I now have a monthly retirement income to help me pay my medical bills."

Explanation: This shows that the cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because of the cartoon character's expressions, actions and words which show gratitude towards CPF.

Josue

2023-02-07 06:31:57 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of the CPF
because when the man retired, he is relived to have money inn his savings account. This is evident from the source which shows that the man was originally mad that part of his salary goes into CPF. However, when the man retired, he is relieved that he has money in his CPF account to pay for his medical bills. Thus this shows that the cartoonist sees CPF as a good thing has it helps the retirees pay for their essential expenses.

Fuchao

2023-02-07 06:32:01 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because GST allows him to pay for his bills when he is able to use his savings.

This is evident from the source which shows that the man at the bottom part of the picture thinking to himself that he "now have a monthly retirement income to help pay his medical bills"

This shows that the cartoonist thinks that CPF is useful after retirement.

Hong Yi

2023-02-07 06:32:04 UTC

The cartoonist is not a supporter of CPF because it makes him have lesser money to spend.

This is evident from the source which shows that he is "mad" that part of his salary goes to his "CPF savings".

This shows that the cartoonist discourages CPF as it reduces the amount of money he earns

Name: Lukas

2023-02-07 06:32:06 UTC

Point: The cartoonist is not a supporter of CPF.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that a man in a cartoon visibly being angry at CPF due to him thinking his hard earned salary is being taken away for nothing and he has no more money to spend because it went into his CPF.

Explanation: This shows that the cartoonist does not agree with CPF though many years later, in the story, the CPF actually helps him.

Seng In

2023-02-07 06:32:07 UTC

Point: the cartoonist is a supporter of the CPF

Evidence: we can see the man years later feeling happy and relief that CPF is here so that he can have a monthly retirement income to help him pay his medical fees

Explanation: this suggest that the cartoonist is in favor with the CPF scheme as it helps save money when they start to work in the early run and can provide income for them when they are old and going to retire, that way he does not need to worry about monetary issues or work for money but live happy in his retirement days :D

Aliff

2023-02-07 06:32:29 UTC

Point: The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because he get money after retirement for his needs.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that the older version of the cartoon character saying " Thanks to CPF I now have a monthly retirement income to help me pay my medical bills."

Explanation: This shows that the cartoonist is appreciative of the money that he gets from it as it supports his future life.

Kishore

2023-02-07 06:32:45 UTC

Point: The cartoonist is a suppoter of CPF because the old man feels relieved as he has the money to pay his medical bills.
Evidence: This is evidents from the source which shows that the older version of hte man smiling while looking at the paper that states 'Monthly Retirement Income'
Explanation: This suggests that CPF will help us when we are old and need many for the medical bills and other necessaties such as food, electricity bill etc

Name: Ao Wen

tan_ao_wen — 2023-02-07 06:32:52 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because later in life he has money to pay for his medical expenses.

This is evident from the source, which show the man expressing relief about the CPF system in Singapore saying " I now have a monthly income to help me pay my medical bills"

This shows that Singaporeans will be ensured in the future after they retire that there will be money in the event of a medical emergency.

Ariana

2023-02-07 06:32:59 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because the person showed the results of having CPF. This is evident from the source, which shows an adult complaining about CPF taking its money so they cannot spend a lot. When they retired, they now get money monthly. This shows that CPF is good because you get money even though you have retired and it helps you to pay your daily needs which you then do not have to worry about not having enough money as you have not irresponsibly spent it during your younger days.

Jervin

2023-02-07 06:33:05 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of GST because they present the man in the photo to be happy to have CPF.

This is evident from the source, which shows that the man is happy to have his CPF to help him cover his medical bills when he is older.

This shows that the cartoonist is feels in a positive way for the CPF Program.

Goh Shuang

goh_shuang — 2023-02-07 06:33:09 UTC

Point: The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because he drew the advantages of having a CPF saving account

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that at first the character was mad of "having part of his monthly salary go to his CPF savings account", saying that he would have "less of his hard-earned money to spend". But then later on, when the character is an elderly, he was thankful of having a CPF to have a "monthly retirement income" to help him pay for his "medical bill".

Explanation: This shows that the cartoonist shows people that they should be grateful and appreciative about this saving and show them that they would not regret it.

Daniel

2023-02-07 06:33:14 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because the characters' mindset had changed.
This is evident from the source which shows that now the character was feeling angry about his salary going into his CPF account but years later when he was older, he was relief that the CPF money was able to help him during his retirement years. This suggests that the cartoonist thinks that CPF is a useful thing.

Mai

2023-02-07 06:33:17 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because CPF helps him pay his hospital bills.
This is evident from the source which shows that the man now was very angry but a few years later the man felt grateful to CPF, him saying 'Thanks to CPF'. This suggests that the CPF helps people to pay bills when they grow older and retire from work.

Dom

2023-02-07 06:33:17 UTC

Point: The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF as initially, the cartoon character is irritated at the fact that part of his income is deducted and he isn't able to spend his whole income however a few years later, he becomes relieved about having CPF as he has a smaller burden to worry about now that he still has some funds.

Evidence: This is evident from the source which states "Where is the logic in this??".

Explanation: Thus, this tells me that the cartoonists sides with his claim of having CPF deduct a portion of our income from our salary as despite thinking that CPF was a useless project at first, he soon learns after retirement that it actually helps lessen your worries about financial stability.

Jiade

2023-02-07 06:33:23 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because his second half of cartoon are telling us CPF is good for us. This is evident from the source which shows that a man complaining about getting less salaries when he was working but years later CPF actually help him to pay the medical bills.This suggests that the CPF might seems useless at the start but it offers a great help when we become older. It supports us with incomes to face our daily needs.

Maximus

2023-02-07 06:33:23 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because he showed a picture of a guy in the present complaining about CPF but then he shows another picture of the guy in many years later being happy that he has CPF for his retirement. This is evident from the source which shows the guy happy that he now has monthly retirement income to help pay for his medical bills thanks to CPF. THis suggests that the writer is thankful to CPF

Kilien

2023-02-07 06:33:26 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because he shows that how CPF supports the citizens.

This is evident from the source which shows that how the cartoon character is angry at CPF in the past and how he was relieved on how it helped him in the future

This shows that the cartoonist is a supporter

Aviel

2023-02-07 06:33:35 UTC

The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because he shows that even though singaporeans might dislike CPF at the start, it is crucial for our survival as we grow older. This is evident from the source, which shows that the main character fussing about the CPF contributions. However, as he grew older, he became grateful for CPF as it gave him a monthly retirement income which in turn allowed him to pay of his medical bills. Thus, this shows that many Singaporeans would only appreciate the CPF in their later years..

Siti

2023-02-07 06:33:46 UTC

Point: The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because when he was old,he felt happy.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that the bird peacefully flying and the sun.
Explanation: This shows that he was really thankful about CPF having part of his money and that in the end he could use it for his bills

Name: Dharchini

2023-02-07 06:34:14 UTC

Point: The cartoonist is not a supporter of CPF at the start but a few years later, he started to support CPF due to how it benefitted him after retirement.

Evidence: This is evident from the source which says that "Having part of my monthly salary go to my CPF savings account means I have less of my hard-earned money to spend." but after a few years later, he said that "Phew! Thanks to CPF, I now have a monthly retirement income to help me pay my medicals bills."

Explanation: This suggests that the cartoonist believes in CPF as it helped him when he got older and needed to pay medical bills. It suggests that the cartoonist was grateful that he had CPF to pay for his medical bills.

Harry

2023-02-07 06:47:37 UTC

The writer s a supporter of NS because it protects our country. This is evident form the source, which shows that "NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to "enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home".".

Name: Tristan

2023-02-07 06:49:09 UTC

Point : the cartoonist is not a supporter of GST , as prices of clothing, daily necessities
and other goods will increase . But the worker's salary would remain the same or maybe even decrease due to increasing GST, but from the help of CPF , when people retire they would not have to worry about not being able to buy their necessities.

nas

2023-02-07 06:50:48 UTC

writer is suportive of ns because it helps keep our nation safe from external attacks and has led Singapore to enjoy decades of peace ,And a safe and secure home. Therefore this shows that the use pof ns is very benificial as its for the sake of our citizens

Name: Lukas

2023-02-07 06:50:54 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because he agrees with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. This is evident from the source which shows that "As prime minister Lee Hsien Loong pointed out in 2017, NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to enjoy 'decades of peace, and a safe and secure home" This shows that although NS may be troublesome, it plays a key point in Singapores Safety

Lucien

2023-02-07 06:50:54 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because it is stated that NS is the only possible to build up a strong defense force to ensure the country's independence.
This is evident from "Since Singapore's population size is so small, we do not have enough citizens to have a regular, full-time army that is big enough to deter external attackers."
This suggests that the writer supports NS as Singapore will be unsafe without NS and that it plays an extremely huge role in keeping Singapore's defense up.

Jervin

2023-02-07 06:51:02 UTC

The writer is a supporter of S because we need to build up a strong defense force.

This is evident from the source, which shows that the writer is stating that "NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defense force to ensure our country's independence."

This shows that the writer is in favor of NS as it is critical to safeguarding Singapore and its independence.

Siti

2023-02-07 06:51:04 UTC

Point: The writer is a supporter of NS because the writer believe that it will help to defend Singapore.
Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that "Ns is the only possible way Singapore can build u a strong defense force to ensure our country independence"

Explanation: This shows that ns is really important for the sake of Singapore so that it can defend our country and protect the the people in our country.

Name: Ao Wen

tan_ao_wen — 2023-02-07 06:51:13 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because he appreciates the many years of peace, safety and a secure home.

This is evident from the source which shows that 'NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence.'

This shows that the writer is grateful that Singapore has a strong army to help protect the country from external attacks so that everyone is able to be safe and enjoy life in Singapore.

Ariana

2023-02-07 06:51:22 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because it helps to protect Singapore. This is evident from the source, which shows that because of NS, Singapore has enjoyed decades of being peaceful and a safe and secure home. This shows that NS benefits Singapore a lot as it keeps Singapore safe from the danger and shows that citizens of Singapore are prepared to defend for Singapore too.

aliff

2023-02-07 06:51:27 UTC

Point: The writer is a supporter of NS because he emphasizes that NS is a way of security .

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that "NS is the only way Singapore can build up a strong defense to ensure our country's independance."

Explanation: This shows that the writer is someone who think that NS is important for the safety of Singapore and without them we would not be in control of our own country.

hannah

2023-02-07 06:51:41 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because the writer feels that having NS allows sinagpore to be liberated. This is evident from "NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence" and "NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home." This shows that the writer is a supportive of NS as they play a big part in the defence of singapore and have defended the country from possible threats allowing the citizens to feel reassured

Josue

2023-02-07 06:52:25 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because its the only was Singapore can build a defense for itself. This is evident from the source which states that, "NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence." and, "NS and the efforts pf NS servicemen have allowed the country to enjoy decades of peace, and a safe secure home." Thus this shows that the writer views NS positively as without NS Singapore will not be able to fend for itself in the future which will cause us to lose the peace and safety of our home.

felice

2023-02-07 06:52:28 UTC

point: the writer is a supporter of NS because the writer feels that NS is important to protect Singapore.
Evid: This is evident from the source which shows that "NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence. NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to "enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home."
explanation: this shows that the writer thinks that NS is important and helpful to serve and protect Singapore.

Kishore

2023-02-07 06:52:29 UTC

Point: The writer is a supporter of NS because NS protects our country from threats.
Evidence: This is evident from 'NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence,' and ' AS Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong pointed out in 2017, NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to "enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home".'
Explanation: This suggests that NS is the key of defense in Singapore as the citizens in SG can live happily and safely.

Fuchao

2023-02-07 06:52:47 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because it helps keep the country safe

This is evident from the source, which shows that " NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence," and " NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to "enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home"."

This shows that the writer thinks that NS is the only way to preserve the safety in Singapore as it helps build a powerful military force.

Hong Yi

2023-02-07 06:52:47 UTC

The writher is a supporter of NS because the writer thinks that NS is required in order to defend the country.

This is evident from the source, which shows "NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence."

This shows that the writer thinks that the only way that Singapore can stand up for themselves against other countries is by developing NS and that he thinks that NS is very important.

Goh Shuang

goh_shuang — 2023-02-07 06:52:56 UTC

Point: The writer is a supporter of NS because of how it told us how important is the role of being in the National Service.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that "NS is the only possible way" to let Singapore built up a strong defense force, especially "Singapore's population size is so small", and not enough people to have a regular, fill-time army.

Explanation: This shows that the role of NS man is critical to the safety of the citizen in Singapore. Thus, people should be willing to take the job seriously to defend the nation.

Name: Denise

2023-02-07 06:53:14 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because the writer feels that having NS is a necessity for Singapore. This is evident from the source, which states that " National Service (NS) the foundation of Singapore's defence forces. NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence". This shows that NS plays an important part in Singapore' safety as without them, it would be harder to defend Singapore and keep it safe.

Name: Youming

2023-02-07 06:53:18 UTC

Point: The writer is a supporter of NS because the writer believed that NS is required for a strong defence force.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that "NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence" and "we do not have enough citizens to have a regular, full-time army that is big enough to deter external attackers".

Explanation: This shows that NS is necessary for a safer and secure future. As a country with a small population, a full-scale army is not possible to be formed on such a small space.

Dom

2023-02-07 06:53:21 UTC

Point: The writer is not a supporter of NS as he thinks that many are required to serve NS for their country regardless whether they wanted to or not in order for our homeland to be secure from foreign threats.

Evidence: This is evident from the source which states "Since Singapore's population size is so small, we do not have enough citizens to have a regular, full-time army that is big enough to deter external attackers." and "NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defense force to ensure our country's independence.

Explanation: Thus this suggests the writer is not in favour of NS however he still believes that it ensures the safety of everyone else within our homeland as due to the small population of our country, we aren't able to build an army that could deter any threats or attacks however with the help of conscription and reservists, this allows us to increase the capacity of our defense force thus increasing our chances to deter foreign threats.

Riyaz

2023-02-07 06:53:23 UTC

The writer is supporter of NS because it helps to protect Singapore. This is evident from the source, which shows that, "only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence". Thus this shows that the writer supports the NS as he explain it is a key role in Singapore's society eventhough it is sometimes trouble some

Jiade

2023-02-07 06:53:23 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because it states that NS is irreplaceable for the country’s safety.This is evident from the source which states that “NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defense force to ensure our country’s independence.” This suggests that Singapore as a small population sized country would only be safe if there is a regular army that protects the country.

Seng In

2023-02-07 06:53:27 UTC

Point: the writer is supportive of NS because NS provides us peace and safety because we know there are people who are ready to help with the army during any crisis

Evidence: NS is the only way of build up Singapore's defence force, which is why NS comes in. People who finish NS are the NS reservists and the one that will build up Singapore's large pool of its army that ensure citizens that Singapore is safe.

Explanation: the writer is in favor of NS as it is a way of how Singapore gets its army from, with NS people who have gone through have the skill necessary for the army during a war or emergency that will help in the support of the army. This would tell citizens of Singapore that Singapore would be safe and they can feel relaxed living here without thinking of negative crisis

Mai

2023-02-07 06:53:33 UTC

The writer is supportive of NS because it helps the country to stay safe and in peace.
The is evident from the source that states NS is the 'only way Singapore can defend its country' as our population size is very small so they do not have enough citizens for full-time army that is big enough to deter external attacks. Mr. Hsien Loong has also pointed out that NS allow the country to 'enjoy decades of peace and safe and secure home'.
This suggests that NS benefit Singapore by building a strong defense to keep the country safe and ensures the independence.

Name: Kilien

2023-02-07 06:53:38 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because he explained how NS can keep Singapore safe.

This is evident from source D that shows " NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to "enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home"."

This shows that the writer supports NS as it allows the citizens to enjoy peace and a safe home.

amron

2023-02-07 06:53:39 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS
It is evident as the writer talks about ns being the foundation of s'pores defence and how it is the only way it can build up a strong defence and defend our country's independence. This suggest that the writer knows that NS was created to ensure our safety and to reassure us that we can live a peaceful life with nS

Name: Chloe

2023-02-07 06:53:53 UTC

Point: The writer is a supporter of NS because he points out that NS benefits Singapore as the Ns servicemen provide protection for out country and serve as a warning to the potential attackers from other countries that should they try anything, they will be ready to protect our country.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that "Since Singapore's population size is so mall. we do not have enough citizens to have a regular, full-time army that is big enough to deter external attackers" and that the "efforts of Ns servicemen have allowed the country to 'enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home' ".

Explanation: This shows that the writer supports NS because he/she acknowledges the efforts of the NS servicemen to defend Singapore from the potential harms from other countries.

Name: Dharchini

2023-02-07 06:54:02 UTC

Point: The writer is a supporter of NS because he shows us how NS has benefitted Singapore and the residents of Singapore by keeping Singapore safe and sheltered from outsiders with negative intentions.

Evidence: This is evident from the source which tells that "NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure out country's independence." and "As Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong pointed out in 2017, NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to "enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home"."

Explanation: Thus this suggests that the writer is a supporter of NS as he has stated how much Singapore benefitted from NS as NS kept Singapore secure from invaders.

Name: Venus

2023-02-07 06:54:11 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because NS is the foundation of Singapore's defence forces.
This is evident from the source which shows that "NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence."
This shows that even though Singapore's population size and small compared to other countries, we still have NS. The efforts that the NS servicemen have put into NS would allow Singapore to be a safer country and have peace.

Aviel

2023-02-07 06:54:12 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because he states that this is the only way for Singapore to counter external threats to its security. This is evident from the source, which shows the writer describing why Singapore needs an armed forces. For example, since Singapore's population is so small, it does not have enough citizens to form a full time army. This shows that although NS may be tiring, it is for the safety of singapore.

Maximus

2023-02-07 06:55:40 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because he was writing about the good things of NS in the source.This is evident from the writer writing"NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country's independence. and he also wrote"NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home."This suggests that the writer is a supporter os Ns as he wrote positive stuffs about NS and about how NS can keep our country safe and let us enjoy peace.

Tristan

2023-02-07 06:56:52 UTC

The writer is a supporter of the NS because , he knows that Singapore is a small country , so the writer knows that there is not enough people to help defend Singapore from crisis that could happen.This is evident from"Since Singapore's population size is so small, we do not have enough citizens to have a regular, full time army that is big enough to deter externa attacker.This shows that the writer fully supports the choice that Lee Hsien Long has said , as the writer knows that singapore has a small population and they dont enough soilders to defend singapore

Daniel

2023-02-08 01:36:40 UTC

The writer is a supporter of NS because it helps the country to be a safe place for longer generation.
This is evident from the source that states NS is the 'only possible way Singapore can build up its defences' to ensure our countrys' independence. And that we 'do not have enough citizens to a regular, full-time army that is big enough to deter external attackers

SOURCE C: Adapted from Aliff's Answer:

priscillalwh — 2023-02-14 01:16:54 UTC

Point: The cartoonist is a supporter of CPF because the CPF scheme ensures elderly Singaporeans get money after retirement for their basic needs.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that the older version of the cartoon character saying " Thanks to CPF I now have a monthly retirement income to help me pay my medical bills."

Explanation: This shows that the cartoonist is appreciative of CPF because it gives Singaporeans financial security in their retirement. This is as CPF allows retired Singaporeans to pay for their healthcare and other needs.

Source D

priscillalwh — 2023-02-14 01:21:44 UTC

National Service (NS) the foundation of Singapore’s defence forces. NS is the only possible way Singapore can build up a strong defence force to ensure our country’s independence. Since Singapore’s population size is so small, we do not have enough citizens to have a regular, full-time army that is big enough to deter external attackers. Hence, we have a small regular army and a large pool of NS reservists. As Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong pointed out in 2017, NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to “enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home”.

SOURCE D: Adapted from Ariana's answer:

priscillalwh — 2023-02-14 01:23:10 UTC

Point: The writer is a supporter of NS because it helps to protect Singapore from potential invaders.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that "NS and the efforts of NS servicemen have allowed the country to “enjoy decades of peace, and a safe and secure home”.

Explanation: This shows that NS benefits Singapore a lot as it makes 2 years military training compulsory for NS men, thus helping to build up a strong military by preparing our NS men to defend Singapore. This, in turn, keeps Singapore safe from outside threats.