<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Case Studies and Scenarios by Kibler, Amanda</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/askibler/5wel95tykrkram1b</link>
      <description>Share your generated and revised case studies and scenarios</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-10-14 16:34:18 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-02-16 19:28:37 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Google Gemini - Case Study</title>
         <author>askibler</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/askibler/5wel95tykrkram1b/wish/3632064986</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In the oak-paneled quiet of <strong>Provost Eleanor Vance’s</strong> office, the flickering screen of the retention dashboard displayed a bleak trajectory. Student attrition was up 3% and the <em>U.S. News</em> ranking was slipping. Her goal was clear: stabilize enrollment and polish the institution’s image. Meanwhile, the General Education Committee, led by the firebrand philosophy professor Dr. Alistair Finch, was proposing an optional <strong>Pass/Fail (P/F)</strong> grading policy for all 100-level Gen Ed courses. Dr. Finch argued it would reduce performance anxiety, encourage intellectual risk-taking, and boost cross-disciplinary exploration, ultimately leading to greater student satisfaction and, ironically, better retention. Provost Vance, however, worried about the immediate optics: would prospective parents and accreditors view a "P" on the transcript for core subjects like calculus or history as a sign of academic rigor or institutional capitulation? Her central dilemma was whether to prioritize a potentially riskier, but student-centric, pedagogical reform over the immediate need to demonstrate unflinching academic standards to external stakeholders.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Critical Thinking Questions:</strong></p><ol><li><p>Does the short-term perception of academic rigor by external bodies (like <em>U.S. News</em> or accreditors) ethically outweigh the long-term pedagogical benefit of reduced student anxiety and increased intellectual exploration?</p></li><li><p>If the P/F option demonstrably <em>improves</em> retention, does the policy fundamentally succeed, even if it might dilute the perceived value of a traditional letter grade?</p></li><li><p>How can the university measure and ensure that students using the P/F option are still meeting the core learning outcomes of the General Education curriculum, beyond a simple passing grade?</p></li></ol>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-10-14 16:40:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/askibler/5wel95tykrkram1b/wish/3632064986</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Phind AI - Case Study</title>
         <author>askibler</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/askibler/5wel95tykrkram1b/wish/3632066900</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.phind.com/search/cmgqsejmo00003j6v4rsg09fc" />
         <pubDate>2025-10-14 16:41:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/askibler/5wel95tykrkram1b/wish/3632066900</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>A Case Study for Students</title>
         <author>askibler</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/askibler/5wel95tykrkram1b/wish/3791650972</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This is a case study my students did last week in Composition I. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads-usc1.storage.googleapis.com/2308448996/3c00c4803a31d5ff961c9db10c448c6a/Student_Copy___Activity.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2026-02-16 19:28:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/askibler/5wel95tykrkram1b/wish/3791650972</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
