[Room 14] HSSRP 2023 Project Review: Comments from Panellists and participants by GEB HSSRP https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97 en-us 2023-07-27 08:01:31 UTC 2026-01-20 23:16:49 UTC hello@padlet.com Leave comments for ACS(I)P3 here. geb_hssrp https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003988 2023-07-27 08:01:31 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003988 Leave comments for NJCP4 here. geb_hssrp https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003989 2023-07-27 08:01:31 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003989 Instructions on how to leave feedback geb_hssrp https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003990 To add a comment to a post, click the space that says: Add comment. Alternatively, you can add a post by pressing the "+" under the project tag heading you are commenting on. When leaving a comment, please begin with your project tag/name.
For example:
Dr Smith: this group has demonstrated extensive knowledge of the subject. However, you can try to make more eye contact with the audience.
XYZP9: the presentation was well organised but the slides were too cluttered and difficult to read. You spoke energetically!

]]> 2023-07-27 08:01:31 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003990 Feedback Guidelines (for Panellist Reference) geb_hssrp https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003991
Thank you for spending time with us this morning to help our young researchers! You may consider giving feedback to projects based on their presentation delivery and on the following points:

1. Mastery of subject knowledge
- Does the project demonstrate extensive knowledge of subject?
- Is there convincing evidence to support ideas and conclusions?
- Are all questions answered with clear elaboration?

2. Organisation of presentation
- Is the organisation of the argument clear and logical?

3. Significance of project
- Is the project relevant or important to the field?
- Will it make a significant contribution?

~ HSSRP 2023 Organising Committee. ]]> 2023-07-27 08:01:31 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003991 Leave comments for NJCP6 here. geb_hssrp https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003992 2023-07-27 08:01:31 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003992 Leave comments for HCIP4 here. geb_hssrp https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003993 2023-07-27 08:01:31 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2652003993 Prof Ang: What is your definition of race? https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660503493 2023-08-12 01:37:49 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660503493 Prof Ang: At the start of the presentation, you talked about propelling some improvement to this issue in Singapore's situation in the 21st century. This has not been answered in the presentation. https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660504811 2023-08-12 01:42:28 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660504811 Prof Ang: Kant's definition of people as "ends" is one who is rational and autonomous. What about children? People with mental disabilities? https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660505337 2023-08-12 01:44:12 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660505337 Prof Ang: In your account on Butler - using instinctive and internalised resentment - it is useful to add how resentment is justified in the context of justice. Instinctive resentment is not a matter of justice in his discussion. https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660510408 2023-08-12 02:05:40 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660510408 Prof Ang: it would be useful to contextualize Frankl's approach as a psychologist. This will make his approach of distancing and trivializing the immediate suffering and evaluating harms as necessary for meaning of life to emerge. https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660511443 2023-08-12 02:09:44 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660511443 Prof Ang: Agreeing with Mr Lim on the connections to be clarified between forgiveness and preservation of dignity - you will need to provide definitions of conditional and unconditional forgiveness in your paper to ground this assumption. That is, clarify that it is unconditional forgiveness that may bring injury to one's dignity. https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660516350 2023-08-12 02:26:06 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660516350 Prof Ang: while you argued that genuine apology is necessary for forgiveness, what are the sufficient conditions for forgiveness? https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660523190 2023-08-12 02:54:35 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660523190 Prof Ang: sharpen and connect the 2 factors/conditions for victims to consider forgiving (1. emotional healing, 2. severity of harm) because it can be easy to find grounds criticize the victim for being unforgiving and resentful in the face of a wrongdoer who is deserving of forgiveness. https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660525123 2023-08-12 03:01:32 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660525123 Prof Ang: consider consciousness in terms of an ability to understand right and wrong in rules and in the society one live in, the ability to evaluate decisions with moral implications, control of one’s intentions and actions, etc. This will help you explain the feature of autonomy of a conscious moral agent which is necessary for the idea of responsibility. https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660527947 2023-08-12 03:14:26 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660527947 cont'd from first comment: defining consciousness this way will also help you see why morality is irrelevant to animals. A lion eating another animal is not immoral. Similar to pigeons pooping is not a moral issue (hypo case 1). Also why children are not held morally responsible for some actions. https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660528316 2023-08-12 03:15:19 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660528316 Prof Ang: Since the paper this paper discusses fault, blame, praise, punishment as if these concepts are similar for moral responsibility and legal culpability, there is a need to clarify the assumption that there is a connection between morality and the law. One example - why is it relevant to establish degrees of moral responsibility when the concern for fault and punishment matter only for legal culpability? https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660528581 2023-08-12 03:16:34 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660528581 Prof Ang: Hypothetical case study Prof Ang: case 3 – why is the sociopath (a psychological condition) being held to high moral responsibility? The conclusion to this case seems to be different from your conclusion on Nagaenthran when both basis of fault is due to psychological factors. https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660530068 2023-08-12 03:23:28 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660530068 Prof Ang: where did this ‘dial’ framework come from? It is rather odd since the topic is usually discussed in terms of autonomy/freedom from (eg. interference and coercion), and freedom to act (without obstacles), etc. Within the context of legal culpability, does dial mean mitigating factors? https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660532716 2023-08-12 03:33:58 UTC https://padlet.com/moegebr/5merualwplcqco97/wish/2660532716