https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg Explain you solution 2 different ways en-us 2016-12-14 15:54:14 UTC 2017-12-08 12:58:58 UTC hello@padlet.com pontiousl https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143642795 Explain in detail HOW you could find the Beehive 2 different ways]]> 2016-12-14 16:17:11 UTC https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143642795 kyl_pos_869 https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143651817 Turn the first equations into slope intercept form. Then I checked the equation with substitution.
(2,0)]]> 2016-12-14 16:39:55 UTC https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143651817 https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143651885 We turned the equation in standard form into y-intercept form by subtracting 2x to both sides. Then we graphed both equations and recorded their intersection point. Using both equations in y-intercept form we substituted y for -2x+4. Our equation was -2x+4=1/2x-1. After subtracting 1/2x and 4 to both sides we had -2.5x=-5.  -5/-2.5= 2 which led us to our answer (2,0). F.A.R.T.]]> 2016-12-14 16:40:06 UTC https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143651885 https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143651951 How to get the answer is to graph and find where the two lines cross and it is that point. Then we used substitution to check our answer. The answer is 2,0]]> 2016-12-14 16:40:17 UTC https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143651951 https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143652295 We found the beehive by graphing (start at the y-intercept then do rise over run to graph the slope) first and we got (2,0). The we used elimination by changing the second equation to standard form, subtracting to get rid of the ys, then multiplying by the reciprical, and our answer was (2,0) again.]]> 2016-12-14 16:41:08 UTC https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143652295 mor_oak_597 https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143652346 We graphed both equations(had to change the first equation) then we found where they intercepted and finally, checked our answer with substitution. When we substituted, we put in 1/2x-1 for Y, and got (2,0) 

F.A.R.T.:)]]> 2016-12-14 16:41:17 UTC https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143652346 https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143652413 When solving F.A.R.T we graphed the two slopes, after converting 2x+y=4 into slope intercept form. So, our answer is (2,0). We proved it by substitution.]]> 2016-12-14 16:41:29 UTC https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143652413 https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143652931 turned both  equations into y=mx+b form and graphed to find the intersection point. (2,0)           we substituted   y=1/2x -1 into  2x +y =4 and got (2,0)
                 ]]> 2016-12-14 16:42:54 UTC https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143652931 https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143654014 We turned the first equation into slope intercept form then graphed both equations to find the break even point. Next we justified our answer by using substitution. We found our answer to be (2,0) ]]> 2016-12-14 16:46:02 UTC https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143654014 https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143661480 When you graph the two equations, the point where the lines intersect is (2,0). Then we solved the equations with substitution and we got

]]> 2016-12-14 17:08:01 UTC https://padlet.com/pontiousl/5lm4fquxzgsg/wish/143661480