6th Hour Padlet for class on 3/5 by Elizabeth Slough https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th en-us 2019-02-27 18:25:57 UTC 2019-03-05 19:27:30 UTC hello@padlet.com Mrs. Slough and Group (example) Writing Score- We gave the writer a score of a 5 for the writing. This was because we felt that they did a very good job, but we thought that they could have improved their word choice to have a more sophisticated tone. For example, they used the word good three different times. They could have changed that word to excellent or phenomenal to create a more interesting tone. language score- 4- we did not see any significant issues with their grammar or mechanics. sloughclass https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338021280 2019-03-05 17:21:42 UTC https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338021280 Tori https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338090387 Writing score - I gave the writer a score of a 4 for the writing. This was because I felt that they did a somewhat good job, but they mixed up past and present tense. They also needed more advanced word choice, the writer used "extensively researched" and "extensive research in the same paragraph. 
Language score - 4 - I didn't see many significant issues with grammer the only main issue was past and present tense.]]> 2019-03-05 19:17:12 UTC https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338090387 Lexi, Giovanna, Alivia https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338090496 Writing Score- We gave the writer a score of a 5. While the writer gets all of their points across, their language and word choice could be more sophisticated.  To elaborate, the writer did what they were asked to do without adding anything extra or using more sophisticated words. 
Language score- We gave the writer a 4 because there were minimal mistakes made.]]> 2019-03-05 19:17:23 UTC https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338090496 Bryce's Table https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338090498 Writing score -  We gave the writer a 4. We believe it did average on the paper as a whole. Word choice we think they could of done better and organization was poor due to having the same paragraph twice.
language score- we give the writer a 4 again. It is just a average paper with a few errors with grammar and mech

]]> 2019-03-05 19:17:23 UTC https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338090498 Cameron's Group https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338090698 Writing Score- We gave the writer a score of 4. There is little to no personality. They state facts without a comparison to other products in order to prove why it's better. Mistakes show constantly throughout. The writer focused more on loading us with information instead of adding their own ideas which makes the paper boring. Paper also has an awful conclusion.

language score 4. not enough of enough mistakes to lower it.]]> 2019-03-05 19:17:42 UTC https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338090698 Abby's Table https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338090733 Writing score- Our group discussed this, and we all agreed on a 4. We think this because, it did not flow well, it was very repetitive, and there were many run- on sentences. Also, due to the repetition it was really hard to follow and quite confusing. Being off topic was a major problem in this student response, and it left us all confused on what the writer was really trying to say. 

Language Score- We are giving this writer a 3, because there was many spelling errors. The verb tenses were incorrect and word choice was poor. ]]> 2019-03-05 19:17:46 UTC https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338090733 Anahlia https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338091393 Writing Score - I gave the writer a 5 for the writing because it isn't as organized as it could be. For example, the author didn't use transitions for each paragraph]]> 2019-03-05 19:18:50 UTC https://padlet.com/sloughclass/6th/wish/338091393