NELP Procurement Stage 2 Workshop Planning - E&L reference group by Lucy Palfreyman (Sport England)

I like the idea of how to gain 'strategic buy-in or advocacy for evaluation and learning' in line with place-based systemic ways of thinking.

chadoatley — 2024-06-18 09:59:01 UTC

2024-06-18 09:59:47 UTC

I feel less inclined by the first topic (understanding partners). I think the Ability and skills to build capacity and Facilitating the use of learning topics would more likely showcase some of the skills you want to see from them

Greater participation of communities in place-based evaluation and learning, and the role of a NELP in assisting this - with local places and at SE.

chadoatley — 2024-06-18 10:00:19 UTC

2024-06-18 10:02:41 UTC

Building capability within local communities (rather than capacity)

2024-06-18 10:26:16 UTC

Need to align them with the areas for assessment in the Task document. e.g. understanding & interpretation of UTM seems to be missing?

2024-06-18 10:27:28 UTC

For Involvement and inclusion of participants within the tasks/phases and discussions during the session, something on use of innovative and create methods under "what we are looking for"

2024-06-18 10:31:42 UTC

Need to be careful on scoring thinking about who is doing the scoring (who is in the room) and where they might be better placed to score vs. less experienced. e.g. scoring around alignment with UTM principles - would a community leader feel qualified to score on that?

It's almost like you need a scoring sheet for observers of the session (Sport England colleagues?) and then one for those involved in the session (with more questions phrased like: "Did you feel included in the conversation?" "Did you understand the task being asked of you?"