<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Assignment 1: Pseudoscience Red Flags  by John Ramos</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2</link>
      <description>By John Ramos</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2020-10-12 20:49:24 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-09-30 22:36:03 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Post #1: Assignment 1</title>
         <author>johnramos66777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879578</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By John Ramos (100744585)</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-12 20:49:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879578</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #2 Red Flag: Ideology</title>
         <author>johnramos66777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879579</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition</strong>:</div><div>     The <strong>Ideology</strong> red flag correlates to the beliefs of a person who is primarily based on their religion, culture, etc. Suppose that these beliefs are so powerful, that it is enough to even influence the decisions that people have made or will make depending on the decision-making process. Ideology is a remarkable red flag, although it can be because it can be <strong>emotionally driven</strong> and things don't end too well when it's taken personally unless you're Michael Jordan.</div><div><strong>Connection</strong>:</div><div>     This article listed below is an Idaho Pastor indicating the idea that masks should not be mandatory in a place of worship. The article focuses on the theme of which provokes the beliefs in freedom choice. The warning sign that suggests this is a pseudoscience simply for the fact that the speakers are supporting their arguments through <strong>past experiences and their beliefs</strong>. It contradicts their supporting arguments which state that there is no basis on scientific evidence and that they are negligent with the idea that there is an answer right in front of them. The speakers support their ideas in a manner that is in a form of arrogance and by ensuring that their opinion is the only one needing justification.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8745115/Idaho-pastor-told-congregation-did-not..." />
         <pubDate>2020-10-12 20:49:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879579</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #5 Red Flag: Ancient Wisdom</title>
         <author>johnramos66777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879580</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition</strong>: </div><div>     <strong>Ancient Wisdom</strong> is a red flag that is based on a traditionalist mindset. It is in fact backed up by the claims of people in way back to ancient times. Many cultures and individuals claim in the support of Ancient Wisdom pseudoscience simply for the fact that it has an <strong>enduring quality</strong>. There will always be a predecessor to the next that has been successful and will in fact be the one for the generations to come.<br><br></div><div><strong>Connection</strong>: </div><div>     A strong case of Flat Earth is a perfect example of the Ancient Wisdom red flag for the instance that it is an ongoing topic to this day. Based on thousands of years of human history, people make any claims to ensure that even the Earth is flat when in fact it may be false. In the face of scientific evidence, the Flat-Earth Society concludes that their knowledge in the Earth being flat is due to the fact that there will be a time where the end of the Earth is a great depth into the unknown. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.livescience.com/24310-flat-earth-belief.html" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-12 20:49:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879580</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #4 Red Flag: Confirmation Bias</title>
         <author>johnramos66777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879582</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:<br>     Confirmation Bias</strong> resonates with the belief in which someone believes in something even though there may not be any scientific proof and that is solely based on their own understanding.<br><strong><br>Connection:<br>  </strong>The connection enticed for confirmation bias as it was the interesting case of The Fairly Odd Parents' incorrect name. As the T.V show is relative to this intellect, there comes a time in which viewers may read it as 'Fairy' instead of the trademark, "Fairly Odd Parents". Although it may be stating the obvious, the viewers will notice that either Wanda or Cosmo may depict the image of a fairy, there have a been a ton of misunderstandings that correlate to the name of the show itself. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article12842681.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200/Fairly-OddParents.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-12 20:49:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879582</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #3 Red Flag: All-Natural</title>
         <author>johnramos66777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879583</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition</strong>:</div><div>     The following red flag is <strong>All-Natural</strong> and is primarily used as some would say, a <strong>business strategy</strong>. Pseudoscience utilizes this red flag that will prominently have the words that contain the following; 'all-natural' in their claims, although, universally it applies to any claims that state whether or not the idea is authentic or the subject is beneficial towards the person's well-being.</div><div><strong>Connection</strong>:</div><div>    Heavily biased to the fact that Essential Oils be widely debated for the possibility of a ton of <strong>health benefits</strong>. The video-equipped below is an explanation of oregano and its many uses throughout the body and mind. Numerous counts of red flags are listed from the start of the video to the end. A statement of 'natural' giving a vibe of trying to seclude the mind of a consumer which checkmates the fact they consider only using their product. Although there are a vast set of different ways a body may react to the product, there have been no claims as to it actually working on every single person it's touched.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuqYhWV8KyE" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-12 20:49:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879583</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #6 Red Flag: Mystical Energy</title>
         <author>johnramos66777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879584</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition</strong>:<br>     The <strong>Mystical Energy</strong> red flag is often used to verify information that would unfortunately be considered false. In this type of situation, the red flag has the word 'energy' prominent, although, the red flag can be used in a manner that may be considered universal. Thus, the 'Mystical Energy' red flag emphasizes that although there are other types of powers at work, a person that cannot physically see them does not entirely suggest that they are "not real".</div><div><strong>Connection</strong>: </div><div>     Miss Cleo is the most famous television psychic, without a doubt. Almost howling the phrase “Your cards are waiting!” viewers/consumers could call her for a tarot card reading. Miss Cleo utilizes the <strong>mystical energy</strong> red flag to convince<strong> vulnerable</strong> audiences and that will convince them to be customers of their product/service is in fact valid. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lzT48rPEhM" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-12 20:49:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879584</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #8 Reason for Belief: Patternicity</title>
         <author>johnramos66777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879586</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition</strong>:</div><div>    <strong> Patternicity </strong>is the human nature to dictate which images and symbolism in things that in fact do not exist. The human brain recognizes patterns in order to ensure they are in a safeguard.</div><div><strong>Connection</strong>:</div><div>     Human faces are one of the most common moments of patternicity. In the image below, the wilting village resembles an old man. In relation to pseudoscience, there has been a relative sense in taking things the <strong>wrong way</strong>, and in this case, there have been some forced perspectives in understanding the overall image. Applying a <strong>skeptical </strong>approach will indulge a reason as to why a pattern was induced into the human mind as a harmless object. It's scientifically proven as to why we feel a little uneasy at the appearance of patterns simply for the fact that our brains tell us to be aware of them. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.tphumancapital.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Article-July-1.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-12 20:49:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879586</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #10 Critical Thinking:</title>
         <author>johnramos66777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879589</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>I chose to evaluate the article from the post-Ancient Wisdom - Are Flat Earthers Being Serious?</strong></div><div><strong>Define Problem: </strong></div><div>Is the Earth flat or round?</div><div><strong>Gather Information: </strong></div><div>The article is written by Natalie Wolchover. The article entails the basis of a topic entitled "Are Flat Earthers Being Serious?". </div><div><strong>Evaluate Evidence: </strong></div><div>The source is credible. Although the writer only shows a great interest in science and in reality has no real experience. This includes research, trials, and evidence! Nowhere does it detail the truth are a though it's been proven to be true with credible sources. This neglects the facts but there has always been a claim and supporting evidence to go along with it.</div><div><strong>Recognize Assumptions, Emotions, Biases: </strong></div><div><em>Natalie Wolchover</em> has a personal bias to her own belief in which the Earth is flat even though the Earth is literally been proved to be spherical. Natalie being skeptical about this idea developed some research that ties into the idea that the Earth is in fact round and everything to go around it is false.</div><div><strong>Synthesize Evidence, Identify Alternatives: </strong></div><div>1. The Earth is flat and that the scientists should have never been paid to lie about Earth’s shape for uncredible reasons.</div><div>2. The Earth is in fact round and that scientists have been right all throughout and that there is enough evidence to claim this fact to be studied upon an institution.</div><div><strong> Select Best Alternative: </strong></div><div>The Earth is round.</div>]]></description>
         <pubDate>2020-10-12 20:49:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/822879589</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #7 Reasons for Belief: Perception and Observation</title>
         <author>johnramos66777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/823152878</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><strong>Definition:<br></strong>     When combining psychological beliefs and observations, it creates information that we believe to be true and that it influences our<strong> decision-making</strong> and perception of a situation when in fact it all comes together after a steady set of trial and error.<br><br><strong>Connection:<br>  </strong>Perception and observation can influence a person's memory of an event all that is based solely on their beliefs. There comes a time in which some people remember events differently than others may perceive it as. The video listed below depicts this statement in the shortcomings of people.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-13 00:06:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/823152878</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reason For Belief 2: Unexplained</title>
         <author>johnramos66777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/823170534</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:</strong> <br>    <strong>Unexplained</strong> is something that even science or the psychics have an answer to, though we would love to gain the knowledge of the unexplained, there are still limitations to everything</div><div> </div><div><strong>Connection:</strong> <br>    Mainly when it comes to the unexplained, there always has been, 'Alien sightings' as the primary headline. These are the type of articles that are “seen and talked about often,” though no one really has an explanation as to it being real or not. It is evident that no human being has come across the path of an Alien and have it surface the entire news as it is claimed to still be false and unjustifiable. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://images04.military.com/sites/default/files/2019-04/ufo-2400.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-13 00:16:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/johnramos66777/50g6u6winlzcgwk2/wish/823170534</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
