<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>6.2 EDU 530  by Kelsey Brown</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/kelsey_k_brown56/4yo2vshadzzm</link>
      <description>Chapter 10</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-08-01 23:50:09 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-08-02 00:11:49 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Strategy #1: Discussion Forums</title>
         <author>kelsey_k_brown56</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kelsey_k_brown56/4yo2vshadzzm/wish/179898140</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In Chapter 10, Mr. Schultz engages students by providing an authentic audience through discussion forums (Hale &amp; Fisher, 2013). This strategy is also similar to his students' everyday interactions with social media, and bridges the gap between effective technology use and academics. Along with the english language arts standards connections, this strategy also lends itself to the third standard of mathematical practice, which states "Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of other (<a href="http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/">http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/</a>). </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-08-01 23:51:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kelsey_k_brown56/4yo2vshadzzm/wish/179898140</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chunking</title>
         <author>kelsey_k_brown56</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kelsey_k_brown56/4yo2vshadzzm/wish/179898653</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>For students that are having trouble making the connections to critique others, Mr. Schultz utilized chunking (Hale &amp; Fisher, 2013). This helps struggling students while also allowing them to be equally engaged in the discussion forum.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-08-01 23:57:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kelsey_k_brown56/4yo2vshadzzm/wish/179898653</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Appropriate Conduct Norms</title>
         <author>kelsey_k_brown56</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kelsey_k_brown56/4yo2vshadzzm/wish/179898724</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By allowing students to set their own norms for conducting the peer reviews, students are "respond[ing] to the varying demands of audience, task, purpose, and discipline," which is one of the English Language Arts College and Career Readiness Capacities that Mr. Schultz addressed (Hale &amp; Fisher, 2013). </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-08-01 23:58:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kelsey_k_brown56/4yo2vshadzzm/wish/179898724</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Strategy #2: Assignment Revision</title>
         <author>kelsey_k_brown56</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kelsey_k_brown56/4yo2vshadzzm/wish/179899677</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Once given feedback or critiques, it would be even more powerful for students to have the chance to revise their work. Magana &amp; Marzano also state that it is important when it is teachers giving the feedback, that they do not record a score for that assignment (2014). This strategy will also help make the learning target and the path to mastery more transparent for the student. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-08-02 00:07:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kelsey_k_brown56/4yo2vshadzzm/wish/179899677</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
