https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq judicial precedent en-us 2019-02-12 10:21:26 UTC 2026-01-04 14:39:55 UTC hello@padlet.com mb05065356 https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/330259170 the part of English law that is derived from custom and judicial precedent rather than statutes.]]> 2019-02-12 10:32:37 UTC https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/330259170 mb05065356 https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/337830382 the decision made by judges based on the facts of a case which are binding on the decisions made by future judges when trying a similar case.]]> 2019-03-05 10:14:04 UTC https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/337830382 mb05065356 https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/337831623 law that is formally written down and recorded as an act of parliament ]]> 2019-03-05 10:19:06 UTC https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/337831623 mb05065356 https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/337833897 It was developed
over the centuries by the decisions judges made in
important cases. The legal system that we know now
began its development during the Norman conquest
of 1066, but it really started to become an organised
system during the reign of Henry II (1154–89). When
Henry came to the throne, justice was usually dealt
with in local courts. These were:
• Feudal Courts – local lords dealing with issues
arising from the peasantry or tenants on their land.
• Courts of the Shires and Hundreds – county sheriffs,
often sitting with a bishop or earl, to hear more serious cases. 
these early
courts were based on local customs that, as you would
expect, often differed from county to county. This lack
of consistency in the law at the time meant that courts
in different areas might settle the same dispute in
entirely different ways.]]> 2019-03-05 10:28:08 UTC https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/337833897 mb05065356 https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/339220471 the original precedent - the original precedent is referred to the initial, new precedent to be set as there is no previous decision the judge to follow until that point of time. 

the binding precedent - the binding precedent refers where the present case has to follow the previous decision when there is a sufficient similarity of the facts.

persuasive precedent - persuasive precedent means precedent which a judge is not obliged to follow, but is of importance in reaching a judgement, as opposed to a binding precedent. persuasive precedents assist the decision maker in determining a case. decisions of power courts and foreign courts can be persuasive precedents. ]]> 2019-03-08 09:29:28 UTC https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/339220471 mb05065356 https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/339226770 the decisions made by create new laws for future judges to follow for instance decisions made by a judge in a certain case are "binding" on the decisions of future judges when the facts of the cases are the same. this procedure is known as judicial precedent. 
judicial precedent is an important part of common law. it is based on the latin saying : Stare decisis et non quieta movere which interprets as "stand by what has been decided and do not change the established". 

the english legal system follows the rules of judicial precedent. meaning that courts in england and wales are required to follow decisions made in higher or superior court, and appeal courts are bound by their own decisions.]]> 2019-03-08 09:56:18 UTC https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/339226770 mb05065356 https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/339235665 stare decisis et non quieta movere - stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established. 
where the point of law in the previous and present case is the same, the court hearing the present case should follow the decision in the previous case. 

ratio decidendi - the latin term "ratio decidendi" means the "rationale or reason for a decision" and refers to that the part of the judgement which is delivered at the end of a case. usually the ratio decidendi is binding on the lower courts.]]> 2019-03-08 10:33:22 UTC https://padlet.com/mb05065356/4xv9nzbqbhnq/wish/339235665