2017 Core 3 Nature v Nurture by Hope Kellman https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5 What is meant by nature v nurture? What makes good people evil? en-us 2017-03-10 15:40:56 UTC 2026-01-27 13:28:37 UTC hello@padlet.com Nature VS. Nurture https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159380075 Jillian Sondag
Nature is influenced by genetic inheritance and other biological factors
Nurture is influenced by external factors after conception 
http://www.simplypsychology.org/naturevsnurture.html

What makes good people evil?
Some people influenced by others and change the way the think to be bad. The electric shock experiment really influences.

http://www.apa.org/monitor/oct04/goodbad.aspx



]]> 2017-03-10 19:54:44 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159380075 What Makes Good People Evil? https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159384475 Sophie L
The Science of Why Good People Do Bad Things
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201411/the-science-why-good-people-do-bad-things
In many cases, people do bad things but are not initially bad people; processes occur that allow leaders to disengage moral reasoning and principals.
The road to this is usually started through justifying bad behavior, sometimes we focus on desired outcomes so much that we rationalize any means in order to achieve the outcome that we want.]]> 2017-03-10 20:14:45 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159384475 What Makes Good People Evil? pt 1 sophialevitt2021 https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159391661 Sophie L
14 Psychological Forces That Make Good People Do Bad Things
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-travis-bradberry/14-psychological-forces-t_b_9752132.html
There are fourteen different ideas on how the mind tricks good people into losing their good morals as stated by Dr. Kaptein.
One is the compensation effect which is referring to the tendency of people to believe that they have moral capital. It's where people do bad things under the idea that they're a good person and it's only one thing. (i.e. eating a bag of candy after exercising)
Another idea is tunnel vision. This is when people become so possessed by an idea or goal that they will ignore and rationalize anything in order to get their ideal outcome. (i.e. wanting to get to the front of the line so bad that one pushes others out of the way)
The next theory is the Pygmalion effect. The theory is referring to the tendency that people have to act the way that people treat them. (i.e. the golden rule)
Obedience to authority is a force that we've seen many times in history. Many people justify their actions by saying that someone told them to do so. Many people feel less guilty for doing something if they didn't decide to do it all on their own. (i.e. nazi trials)

]]> 2017-03-10 20:57:00 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159391661 3 Reasons Why Good People Do Surprisingly Bad vfrankel https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159464522 The three reasons discussed in the article are desperation, boredom, and ignorance and there are other reasons not mentioned. Many people want to get noticed and do something out of the ordinary. They do so out of desperate measures. When someone is bored their brain will tell the that they need excitement, but it might not be a good choice to always be occupied. People will get frustrated when they do not know something or all the details and want to get rid of that frustration from ignorance. ]]> 2017-03-12 01:17:26 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159464522 Nature vs. Nurture Explained laurenbarsky202 https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159467649 Nature versus nurture is one of the oldest debates about psychology. Genes and the hereditary factors are a big part of nature. Nature can even be someone's appearance or their personality. Nurture is the parts of someone's life that impacts who they are. Their early life, how they were brought up, friends and family, and even where they live play a role in nurture. Nature versus nurture really is how a person looks verusus how they were brought out. An example would be if a boy were to get into a fight, would he do it because he has anger issues or because he is abused at home? Researches are trying to find the answer to would it be nature or would it be nurture and why. ]]> 2017-03-12 03:42:52 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159467649 Nature vs. Nurture laurenbarsky202 https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159468307 In the article "Nature vs. Nurture Issues", it talks about whether certain actions are caused by nature or nurture. One debate is over intelligence. If someone was highly intelligent whether it came from nature or nurture is debated. The argument for nature would be that the person had inherited his or her parents intelligence levels. They could have also been "born smart" if they developed early or quick learning skills. It could be nuture because the person could have been affected by their education. What school they attended, what teachers they had, play a role in how they learned. As well as, how the child was raised. Another topic that was debated was personality and how it is developed. There are studies conducted to see how children develop personalities. The argument for nurture would be the influence of their parents and how they act. When a child is little they look up to their parents as soon they to be as when they grow up. The effects of nature would be when a child feels more comfortable with certain behaviors like shyness because it may be a comfort to them. Normally, the person's parent would not demonstrate the trait, they would have learned it for themselves. It could be argued that the child's personality is developing. ]]> 2017-03-12 04:14:08 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159468307 Altruism: Nature or nurture? sofiamartinez20 https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159503929 Sofia Martinez
-"Altruism: Nature or Nurture?" covers the widely debated topic of selflessness and if one is born with it or if their experiences shape altruism. Abigail Marsh, PhD and scientists at Georgetown University conducted a study of the amygdala, a part of the brain that helps perceive emotions. They wanted to see if the size of a human's amygdala would affect how altruistic they are. They studied the size of amygdala's that psychopaths have and people who are organ donors and voluntarily gave an organ to save a person's life. Scientists saw a difference in size of the right side of the amygdala between the groups. While this study proved that the size of the amygdala comes into play with how altruistic a person is, there are other components many believe are influential. Including what a parent teaches their child on acts of selflessness and giving. Overall, one could say that both nature and nurture come into play when shaping a person's selflessness.]]> 2017-03-12 16:00:51 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159503929 What Makes Good People DO Bad Things https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159504040 Lille Ochs
According to "Why Good People Do Bad Things," a CNN report, being aware of why good people do bad things occasionally can help ourselves from doing bad things. One main reason is that doing something bad could potentially benefit them for a while. In addition, Oliver Sheldon believes that many people don't even realize they are tempted to doing something, or do it without thinking. People also may think they have a struggle that could possibly repeat itself therefore, this could cause one to act out of their normal boundaries or create a bad action. Furthermore, if a person was informed before committing a bad action, they have a lower chance of doing it because they would know the consequences and the positives and negatives to the act. It is also very helpful to reflect on bad decisions before making another one, which many of us do not do on a daily basis. Not many people think of this, but simply promoting good behavior around you or trying to convince others to be honest and make the right decision could possibly keep them from doing something bad. http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/25/health/good-people-do-bad/]]> 2017-03-12 16:01:57 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159504040 Nature V.S. Nutrure https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159505443 Lille Ochs
Nature v.s. Nurture is a highly discussed debate on human personalities and behaviors. Nature is more genetic and is one component for mental health conditions like "bipolar and major depression." (Nature vs. Nurture, Good Therapy) Bipolar Depression has a very high chance of developing when a family member has or had it. Nature is also more commonly known for a factor of addition. Just like mental illnesses, you are more likely to be an addict if a family member was or is addicted, therefore it runs in the family. On the other hand, nurture can also cause a mental illness. If you are in a badly kept environment or your behavior is negative, you could develop a mental illness. James Fallon who is a neuroscientist, has discovered that he has the brain a that thinks like a psychopath. He said that it helped him to be in a good and happy environment, which is a huge factor or nurture. This made him happy and successful without leaning towards becoming a psychopath. Researchers at the University of Liverpool in England found out that while nature and genetics is the second role in mental illnesses, child abuse, school bullying, childhood trauma, or other negative nurturing habits is the leading factor in mental illnesses. http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/psychpedia/nature-versus-nurture]]> 2017-03-12 16:19:12 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159505443 Empathy’s Natural, but Nurturing It Helps sofiamartinez20 https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159507622 Sofia Martinez
The New York Times article, "Empathy’s Natural, but Nurturing It Helps" discusses how empathy can be affected through nurture. Children often show signs of empathy at a young age naturally, but they still need to learn certain how to be kind and show empathy towards others. When parents model acts of kindness in front of children, it teaches kids the fundamentals of it. Children need to understand why empathy is important by watching. “Empathy comes from being empathized with,” Dr. Stanley I. Greenspan says. Some other influences of empathy are books, books can put a child in another person's shoes and helps them understand what it is like to feel a certain way. ]]> 2017-03-12 16:47:17 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159507622 Nature vs. Nurture https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159508349 Nate Crockford
Nature Vs Nurture is widely debated topic. Genes and hereditary factors are a big part of  Nature. Nurture is the part of someone's life that makes them who they are. Nurture starts from when you are young kids. How you were raised can affect your nature. Friends and family can also have a effect on someone's nature. Nature and nurture are very different nature is how you feel and what you believe. Nurture is how you are raised and how you are affected by friends and other. Nature and Nurture is still being researched and researchers are still finding answers on this topic.
https://explorable.com/nature-vs-nurture-debate]]> 2017-03-12 16:55:28 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159508349 Hannah Dworsky https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159518939 Nature vs. Nurture is a majorly discussed topic on human behavior and what effects it. The nature side explains how genes determine looks but not personality. It is still unknown if it personality, sexual orientation and intelligence are from genetics. Scientists think that a "Gay Gene" is right when you are born and parents and peers don't influence it. The nurture side believes that you can train a child to be something. The question still goes on, is it the environment your in or people around you

https://explorable.com/nature-vs-nurture-debate]]> 2017-03-12 18:53:59 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159518939 Hannah Dworsky https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159520425 Do Genes Make People Evil? This is a topic that is very hard to find the answer to because scientists sometimes refer to dreams. But they cant ask a infant about there dream last night. There for they look for body movements like muscle twitches and eye movements. Many crimes can be found as two genes combined but placed in the wrong environment. 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-genes-make-people-evil/]]> 2017-03-12 19:12:29 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159520425 Forces That Make Good People do Bad Things https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159520452 Blake Valfer
Nature vs. Nurture is a highly debated topic. This is about the way humans act or their personalities and behaviors. According to Travis Bradberry, some people may make poor choices to be as good as their friends or other people. The Pygmalion effect may also be a reason people make certain choices. The Pygmalion effect refers to when people have the tendency to treat other people the way they are being treated. People also act better when they are being treated with more loyalty, or respect compared to other people they are working with. 

]]> 2017-03-12 19:12:49 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159520452 Can DNA Make People Do Bad Things https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159521031 Harry Kong
Nature vs. Nurture is a very old argument.  The nature side explains how the coding of our genes in each cell can determine what traits we have. One of the many issues about the nature theory is that the behavior genes can influence divorce, criminal acts etc... The nurture theory states that genetic influence over abstract traits may exist; however, the environmental factors are the real origins of our behavior. This means that the nature of you behavior like your genes may influence your behavior and such to do bad things, but ultimately it is the environment that you are raised in that influences you to do things. For example, if you lived in a neighborhood that was used to no manners and was very common in abuse and violence, that is what that person would be accustomed to. https://explorable.com/nature-vs-nurture-debate

]]> 2017-03-12 19:20:44 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159521031 Nature VS Nurture debate https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159526365 Skylar Sachs
Nature v.s Nurture is a common debate that has been going on for years. The debate discusses if personality and behavior, etc is caused by either nature or nurture. Nature is believed to come from genetics and hormones in a person. Different types of behavior usually depends on genes. Theories and thoughts have changed multiple times considering how there has been a change culture around the world which makes it different. Personality in someone comes from their experiences and the way that a person grew up. Childhood is one of the most powerful influences on behavior and personality in nature and nurture. Environment is huge and the way that any person was raised will affect how they act when they are older. 
http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/psychpedia/nature-versus-nurture]]> 2017-03-12 20:18:33 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159526365 Are we really born that way https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159526865 Skylar Sachs
There is still a strong debate going on deciding if  physical characteristics are made up from your DNA and how much, and how much of personal characteristics are dependant on a person's life style. Theories of environment and DNA are both traced back to the thirteenth century, so this shows that this debate has been unknown for many years and will continue. One side of this debate says that instincts are nature, and how parents raise their child and what they do to them and for them is nurture. Nature is heredity which will give a person their intelligence level, personality,anger level/emotion and sexual orientation. Behavior comes from genes which will affect life choices such as crime. The people on the nurture side believe that behavior and action choices come from background and how they grew up. Such as previous experiences and parental guidance.
https://www.thoughtco.com/nature-vs-nurture-1420577 ]]> 2017-03-12 20:24:43 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159526865 Why do we go against our morals when we are in a group of people elizabankier202 https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159534901 Eliza Bankier
Through multiple studies, including one from MIT, it has been prove that people lose sight of what is right vs. wrong when they are surrounded by their peers. Associate professor of cognitive neuroscience at MIT, Rebecca Saxe, claims that individuals within groups who would never commit a crime alone have a much easier time doing it with other people. It has also been shown that someone in a group will feel less responsible for their actions versus someone who is making a decision alone. In another study conducted by NeuroImage  the researchers observed brain activity in a region of the brain that thinks about oneself. "They found that in some people, this activity was reduced when the subjects participated in a competition as part of a group, compared with when they competed as individuals."  When someone is in a mob of people, their own thoughts can be washed out by others around them, and plays a major role in decision making.
http://news.mit.edu/2014/when-good-people-do-bad-things-0612]]> 2017-03-12 21:58:13 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159534901 Nature vs. Nurture sofiamartinez20 https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159537978 Nature vs. nurture is a commonly debated topic on how humans act and if it is affected by their own experiences or genetics. Popular understandings and beliefs of this topic have changed over time. In the 60s, many people followed theories based on behaviorism. At this time, majority of people thought people were mostly shaped by nurture. Though, there are many mental conditions that can be developed by nature such as schizophrenia and depression. But there are also common experiences that can cause mental illness such as bullying and abuse. In conclusion, nature and nurture are both influential and therefore inseparable when it comes to human behavior.]]> 2017-03-12 22:42:16 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159537978 Abbie BayneNature vs Nurture http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/psychpedia/nature-versus-nurture-Nurture is known as “environment and experience” and Nature is known as genetics and genes -recently debates have been about the different effects of genes that change your personality-Genetics have been a main factor with different mental diseases like bipolar, depression and schizophrenia-Nurture is also a factor of illnesses like alcoholism due to the environment one is put in it effects their decisions -Nature and nurture are both key factors to one's illness because genetics could be a part as well as the environment they live in/surroundings https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159540207 2017-03-12 23:11:19 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159540207 Abbie Bayne What makes good people evil?https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201411/the-science-why-good-people-do-bad-things-Often starts with one leader and a group that follows this leader without questioning -Many followers blame the leaders that had these ideas however they still committed-These behaviors also come into play when people say that this person deserved what happened to them -many good people compare their acts to people that made even worse decisions -this makes you sound like your act was not as bad as the other person in the scenario-Many good people follow others or do their acts through the hate building inside them https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159541485 2017-03-12 23:27:07 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159541485 Nature vs Nurture https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159545638 Anabel Casieri
The coding of genes in each cell in us humans determine the different traits that we have, more dominantly on the physical attributes like eye color, hair color, ear size, height, and other traits is the scientific definition of Nature. However, it is still not known whether the more abstract qualities like personality, intelligence, sexual orientation, likes and dislikes are gene-coded in our DNA, too. The nurture theory holds that genetic influence over abstract traits may exist; however, the environmental factors are the real origins of our behavior. This includes the order to generate a new behavior to a child, or alter an unlikely behavior being shown by the child. Nature and Nurture are both very important to one's behavior and a way that genes work behavioral based


]]> 2017-03-13 00:30:37 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159545638 Amy Lyons-Nature vs Nurture Debate Notes: https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159545782 -Nature: genetic/hormone based behaviors
-Nurture: behaviors shaped by  environment and experience
-Nature (genetics) is a key factor leading to depression
-Also mental disorders, though not fully 
-Addictions can also be a nature commonality throughout genetics
-Such as alcohol addictions running through families
-Growing up in a loving and nurturing environment may explain paths of success
-Friends, parents, peers may associate with your addictions 
-A strong predictor of mental illnesses often start with one being nurtured the wrong way
-Such as one growing up bullied, abused, or experiencing trauma
-With many tests ran with identical twins separated, it was found out that personality is commonly shaped from genetics
-The debate still continues, with a closure that both nurture and nature are a key factor to shaping one's choices and behaviors]]> 2017-03-13 00:33:03 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159545782 What Makes Good People Evil? https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159546583 Anabel Casieri
Some things that people occasionally do when they are trying to make things bad are-
-Provide people with an ideology to explain beliefs for actions
-Make people take a small first step toward a harmful act with a minor, unimportant action and then gradually increase those small actions
-Make those in charge seem like a "just authority."
-Transform a once compassionate leader into a oppressive figure
-Provide people with unclear and ever-changing rules
-Relabel the situations actors and their actions to validate the ideas
-Provide people with social models of agreement
-Allow dissent, but only if people continue to obey with orders
-Make exiting the situation difficult

While doing this, one will make a situation worse that it possibly is, and it would work the same way with a person. 


]]> 2017-03-13 00:45:22 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159546583 Why do Good People Do Bad Things? https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159551610 Andrea Balestra
Dr. Muel Kaptain has done research on bad behavior for many decades. while conducting this research, Kaptian has found that there are 14 psychological situations that can cause a good person to do bad things. The first is the compensation effect. This is when someone just wants to take a break from all the good they have done. these people start to Demonstrate these behaviors, as they keep on telling themselves, "Just one thing,.t. The second, the power of games, can alter of how one pictures whatever one names. Thirdly, is cognitive dissonance. When two opinions are presented, the discomfort one feels causes them to forget the guilt of their wrong doing. The broken window theory is when there is chaos and one attempts to get back their authority, by showing dreadful behavior.  Tunnel Vison is when one becomes too focused on completing a task the forget to consider other consequences. The Pygmalion effect is now people are treated, is how those people will act in response. One of the dominant situations being pressured to follow rules. If a group is demonstrating bad behavior, the members are most likely to exhibit this sort of behavior. There are many more situations as to why one would participate in a bad activity. One of the strongest situations is reactance theory. Many love to be free, if they feel as though they are not as free as they would like to be, they start to break the rules in order to feel being free.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-travis-bradberry/14-psychological-forces-t_b_9752132.html]]> 2017-03-13 01:38:44 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159551610 3 Reasons Why Good People Do Surprisingly Bad Things https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159555378 Andrea Balestra
Desperation, Boredom and Ignorance are listed to be reasons as to why one would do bad things. Wanting to have an exciting experience and being brave often cause one do do something crazy. Having boredom can cause the brain to want to have an adventure. In order to fill this void, one will tend to lead to harmful activities. Lacking consciousness about situations can force ignorance upon someone and cause them to make decisions with consequences.
http://danwaldschmidt.com/2012/12/attitude/why-good-people-do-bad-things]]> 2017-03-13 02:20:36 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159555378 Nature vs. Nurture elizabankier202 https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159556942 Eliza Bankier
The differences and similarities of nature vs. nurture are regularly discussed in the field of psychology. They are both vital pieces of the puzzle when it comes to someone's moral compass, and more importantly, how much they follow it. Nature is describes as genetics; traits that were handed down to you from you parents. For example, if both parents have a strong sense of integrity, chances are their child will have that too. Even though this is the foundation of mental health, psychology is something that can be drastically shifted overtime; that is where nurture plays a role. A baby may be born with specific traits but education, family life, privileges and social life can be more dominant as someone grows up. "... children brought up in the ghetto tend to score lower on tests because they are denied the same life chances as more privileged members of society." Financial troubles or lack of opportunity for a child can create boundaries later on, whereas children who have a better education when tey are young have an easier time as an adult. This tpic is very complicated and demonstrates that psychology is not set and stone at any stage in life.
http://www.simplypsychology.org/naturevsnurture.html]]> 2017-03-13 02:37:17 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159556942 Zach Lefkovitz https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159712822 Nature vs Nurture

“Nature vs Nurture: Are We Really Born That Way?”

https://www.thoughtco.com/nature-vs-nurture-1420577

  • What makes people who they are is determined by DNA and Life experiences
  • Nature vs Nurture debates dates back to 13th century
  • People behave as they do because of genetic predispositions or animal instincts, Nature
  • People are taught to think and behave certain ways, Nurture
  • Nature endows us with inborn abilities, Nurture molds these abilities and traits
  • Nature
  • abstract traits such as intelligence, personality, aggression, and sexual orientation are encoded in an individual's DNA.
  • Most debated gene is if attractions to same gender can be found in genes
  • Twins with similar genes act more similar than basic siblings with more difference in their genes
  • Nurture
  • Our behavioral aspects originate only from the environmental factors of our upbringing
  • Studies on children and infants show most support for the Nurture argument
  • Little Albert Experiment proved that a person can take any infant and train them to act the way he wants them to
  • Studies on twins show that Humour in an acquired trait, and is developed through family and environment

What Makes Good People Bad?

“13 Powerful Psychological Forces That Make You Do Bad Things”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/travisbradberry/2016/12/14/13-powerful-psychological-forces-that-make-you-do-bad-things/2/#646772433916

  • Compensation Effect
  • Good deeds balance out bad deeds
  • If you do a lot of good, you can take a break and do a bad deed and keep the scale balanced
  • Cognitive Dissonance
  • When a person’s beliefs and behavior are contradictory, one’s beliefs will override their behavior and make them feel good, when doing bad
  • Tunnel Vision
  • One will focus on a goal so hard that they will do anything to achieve it, disregarding ethics and compassion
  • The Pygmalion Effect
  • People will treat other the way people treat them
  • If someone is treated horrible, he will, in result, treat others horribly
  • Pressure of Conformity
  • It’s hard not to do what everyone else is doing
  • If evil acts is the norm, then people are very likely to do those actions
  • Obedience to Authority
  • It’s hard to ignore the commands or higher authority
  • People feel less responsible for actions when they are under direction of others
  • Competition
  • People will do awful things to become first place and beat their competitors
  • Acceptance of Small-Theft
  • Smaller scale crimes are seen as acceptable because of the low significance of the item taken
]]> 2017-03-13 15:28:30 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159712822 Aidan schwartz https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159841795 The nature vs nature debate us I be is a debate that has remained unanswered ever since it was started. To simplify it, it mainly comes down to whether a person's traits are inherited, or learned. Evidence of either being true exist, so it's easy to see why the debate hasn't come to conclusion.
Gene's determine one's physical Qualities, but there is no confirmation that Gene's affects their mental traits. There is still evidence to suggest that these  behavioral genes are something that are inherited, such as there being a noticeable pattern in how twins demonstrate similar behaviors to each other. 
The "nuture" side of the debate suggests that traits are gained through experiences, not from inheritances from genes. This would mean traits could be controlled by putting someone in an artificial set of conditions.  Although this has never been done, some physiologists who support that side of the debate claim they can train children in infancy to inherit any trait. 
With both sides of the argument holding seemingly equal legitimacy, only time will tell when the debate will end.




]]> 2017-03-13 22:34:36 UTC https://padlet.com/hkellman/4xrp92srm6f5/wish/159841795