a) can it be inferred that her approach challenges the dualistic view of nature and society or nature and culture in line with her challenge to the dualistic view of human and algorithm? What can the underlying view of nature in her account be? Can it be argued that nature is constructed continuously in her understanding, in which there is no outside to algorithm, rather than a static view of nature? 

           b) does «human» have a distinctive characteristic which ontologically distinguishes her from machine? How can a critical, historical approach to “technology», which is based on the critique of the «domination of nature» by «man» in patriarchal-capitalist society, be possible if it is assumed that the distinction between human and machine is eroded? Is there any room for historical analysis in Amoore’s view of «composite form of being»?