https://padlet.com/rsidhu5/4q5t30qe8qgpnm1z en-us 2022-01-13 04:41:35 UTC 2022-01-13 04:57:58 UTC hello@padlet.com 200300541 https://padlet.com/rsidhu5/4q5t30qe8qgpnm1z/wish/1989616616 The simple answer to this question is that many people including officials in the US army believe that the army by itself does not pose a greater threat than greenhouses or any other industrialized activities. moreover, army operations are always seen as a security matter and always rendered as top-priority, therefore, most of the impacts of the army operations on climate change are intentionally neglected. 

Also, a great deal of the army operation of any superpower is dedicated to activities that would eventually threaten and worsen climate change. that involves activities like protecting mining, protecting transportation of sources, or operation to ease the access to sources. Hence, it is inappropriate for those powers to openly criticize the military role in climate change deterioration.

How the U.S. Military Creates More Greenhouse Gas Emissions Than Entire Countries | GQ]]> 2022-01-13 04:50:58 UTC https://padlet.com/rsidhu5/4q5t30qe8qgpnm1z/wish/1989616616 https://padlet.com/rsidhu5/4q5t30qe8qgpnm1z/wish/1989622268 2022-01-13 04:56:45 UTC https://padlet.com/rsidhu5/4q5t30qe8qgpnm1z/wish/1989622268 sultanramadhan65 https://padlet.com/rsidhu5/4q5t30qe8qgpnm1z/wish/1989623449 The US military is a great contributor to climate change. If the Pentagon were a country it would be the world's 55th biggest emitter of co2. Yet the only department in Washington that regards climate change as a real threat is the Department of Defence, which is seriously concerning.


How Military Build-up and War Contribute to Climate Emergency (theintercept.com)]]> 2022-01-13 04:57:58 UTC https://padlet.com/rsidhu5/4q5t30qe8qgpnm1z/wish/1989623449