Questions about Assignment 2: Interview write up. by https://padlet.com/jholmes20/4hlmdn30154c357d en-us 2025-02-13 20:33:19 UTC 2025-03-07 12:47:52 UTC hello@padlet.com Assignment 2 Question https://padlet.com/jholmes20/4hlmdn30154c357d/wish/3349866704 For the introduction, on the rubric it says to talk about "who," "what," "when," "where," and "why" when describing the person you interviewed. At the same time, some of the provided resources emphasize the importance of explaining the purpose of the interview article.


My question is, when addressing "why" in the introduction, should we be interpreting this as explaining "why the person you interviewed decided to go into teaching" or why in terms of "why is this interview taking place" (thereby explaining the purpose of the interview)?

]]> 2025-03-04 01:16:48 UTC https://padlet.com/jholmes20/4hlmdn30154c357d/wish/3349866704 Assignment 2 Question https://padlet.com/jholmes20/4hlmdn30154c357d/wish/3349889385 On the rubric, what is meant by "5 points 5 examples" underneath the "summary" and "conclusion" categories?


For example, for the "summary" we are asked to: "provide a detailed summary of the interview with a clear indication of the questions." Does "5 points 5 examples" mean we include only 5 of our interview questions as examples and we get a point for each summary we provide to those 5 examples? Is this how the 10 total allocated marks are broken down?

]]> 2025-03-04 01:35:12 UTC https://padlet.com/jholmes20/4hlmdn30154c357d/wish/3349889385