BILL OF RIGHTS by Barlin Gloto https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4 Civil Liberties en-us 2025-01-14 14:16:06 UTC 2025-01-15 17:49:48 UTC hello@padlet.com 1: freedom of speech barlin_gloto26 https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3290549765 the government has to allow us to speak

PRECEDENT: tinker v Des moines. this cemented free speech for students at school.

]]> 2025-01-14 14:22:59 UTC https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3290549765 2: right to bear arms barlin_gloto26 https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3290562511 the rulers can't resist this right and should not be infringed.

PRECEDENT: McDonald vs City. They came to the claim that it is a fundamental right for protection and other stuff

]]> 2025-01-14 14:29:44 UTC https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3290562511 3: quartering of soldiers barlin_gloto26 https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3290575041 the government can't just come into anyone's home

PRECEDENT: Anti- quartering act 1679. This prohibited English soldiers to enter into someones house without consent.

]]> 2025-01-14 14:36:24 UTC https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3290575041 4: search warrant barlin_gloto26 https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3290587052 the government can't have any unreasonable searches

PRECEDENT: Brendlin vs California. This happened during a traffic stop, being a search and seizure.

]]> 2025-01-14 14:43:14 UTC https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3290587052 5: protection against incrimination barlin_gloto26 https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3290597113 the government must allow us to have a jury

PRECEDENT: Miranda vs Arizona. During this case the further expanded the idea that not only in courts but when a person is being questioned.

]]> 2025-01-14 14:48:52 UTC https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3290597113 6: right to jury barlin_gloto26 https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3292245000 the government can't just accuse someone of a crime without giving them a lawyer and jury

PRECEDENT: Gideon vs Wainwright. This Court case set the standard to give citizens a right to a attorney

]]> 2025-01-15 15:59:31 UTC https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3292245000 7: federal courts barlin_gloto26 https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3292251413 the government has to allow citizens a right to a jury in a federal court case when it exceeds a certain dollar amount.

PRECEDENT: Curtis vs Loether. During analyzation the court concluded that this action of jury is implied.

]]> 2025-01-15 16:03:40 UTC https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3292251413 8: unusual punishment barlin_gloto26 https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3292388170 no cruel or unusual punishment, an excessive bail shall not be asked

PRECEDENT: Francis v. Resweber. This made Court realize that a second punishment doesn't violate the 8th if it failed the first time.

]]> 2025-01-15 17:38:58 UTC https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3292388170 9: specific rights barlin_gloto26 https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3292392846 the government is not allowed to take away rights that are specified in the constitution

PRECEDENT: U.S. Public Workers v. Mitchell. They fought so the government can't take away rights in the work place.

]]> 2025-01-15 17:42:41 UTC https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3292392846 10: specific power barlin_gloto26 https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3292401896 If something isn't stated in the constitution government cannot use that power against citizens. It belongs to state or people.

PRECEDENT: Printz v. United States. Federal Bradly violated states right in gun violence act.

]]> 2025-01-15 17:49:47 UTC https://padlet.com/barlin_gloto26/4duyhpyn6y77yty4/wish/3292401896