The instructor argues against Lindemann’s claims because he is silent on one crucial point. This point is that composition courses are taught by the English department.  Therefore, the argument is made that composition and English are not separate. Jay argues that a composition course would be missing something if the history of imaginative writing and its contribution to the language was left out.

 

“Reading books has the become the occasion for their own questions about human growth and change.” – Elizabeth Latosi-Sawin at Missouri Western State College—

She argues that literature should be used in the first-year freshman composition course because the study of literature can relate to more than just literary criticism or analysis.  She argues that literature shapes us as human beings, and I think she believes this should be a purpose of the freshman class.

 

Leon Knight at North Hennepin Community College—

This instructor gives four points for having literature in the freshman composition class. He explains that it is practical, enjoyable, efficient to learn critical thinking skills, and a way to introduce cultural diversity.  Knight believes it is practical because academic reading is just as important as academic writing. In college, students write what they have read.  He makes the argument it is just as important for students to read.  He argues that if students learn to enjoy reading, it will not become a chore.  Reading teaches critical thinking skills, and finally, Knight thinks that students being exposed to a culturally rich range of texts will introduce them to cultural diversity.

 

Jeanie C. Crain at Missouri Western State College—

Crain argues that literature can be used in the composition course because she explains that literature goes beyond fiction, poetry, and drama.  Literature expands more genres than that. Crain extends on Tate’s ideas that composition courses should not exclude texts.