“Education in a private school is always better than in a public school”. It is a belief that although e has been shown to be true, it is not true in all cases. I think that private education has a lot of benefits to students such as personalized education, higher quality, better infrastructure, bilingual education and more technological progress for students. However, it has some disadvantages such as high cost, poor accessibility and lucrative interest. Specifically, in superior education the private university offers better opportunities in de laboral market, providing quality in their classes, as well as in teachers, skills and study materials. The protagonism of private schools causes public schools to go into the background, making their benefits invisible, such as easy access, free and inclusion is promoted. It also has the support of the State for its maintenance as well as sports, cultural and academic programs. However, the system or the generalized idea that people have privilege the image of private schools before those of a public nature. In that sense, the approach towards a better education with all the requirements of the labor world at a lower cost in terms of setbacks is provided by private schools and universities. It will probably stay that way for a long time. Although it is indisputable that countries must ensure that their citizens of any status have the right to have a quality education.

It is an interesting and promising initiative since it really contributes to the reduction of materials that are endangering nature.

The presenter spoke very clearly, fluently and transmitted the message very well.

The content of the presentation is limited, it does not express a clear problematization about the danger of dogs in Colombia and there is no explanation of this issue. He didn't describe the relevance of this event. As for the presentation, there was no fluency or mastery of the subject.