<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Remake of 1302 Essay #3 Outline by Skilar Thomas</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n</link>
      <description>Short Story Literary Analysis Report</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-04-04 20:27:52 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2019-04-06 18:39:38 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Thesis Statement</title>
         <author>skilarthomas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720716</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-04 20:27:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720716</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Short Story and Criticism Type</title>
         <author>skilarthomas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720717</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Yellow Wallpaper and Feminist</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-04 20:27:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720717</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Intro Paragraph</title>
         <author>skilarthomas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720719</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Throughout the centuries of which The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman have been read , there has been a shift in the reading of the short story. When it was first published it was read as a story about medical hysteria and depression. As the years go by The Yellow Wallpaper has been more widely critique with a Feminist eye. Using feminism criticism, many scholars explore the portrayal men and women, in regards to intelligence, superiority, and freedoms. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-04 20:27:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720719</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Body Par. #1</title>
         <author>skilarthomas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720720</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>Intelligence</li><li>He thinks she is going crazy when she is actually just creative.</li><li> Ironically, despite his abhorrence of faith and superstition, John fails because of his own dogmatic faith in materialism and empiricism, a faith that will not allow him even to consider the possibility that his wife's imagination could be a positive force. (Article 3)</li><li>John's role as a doctor and an American male requires that he use his "knowledge" continuously and doggedly, and he would abhor the appearance of imagination in his own mind even more vehemently than in his wife's.(Article 3)</li><li>For John, mental illness is the inevitable result of using one's imagination, the creation of an attractive "fancy" which the mind then fails to distinguish from reality. He fears that because of her imaginative "temperament" she will create the fiction that she is mad and come to accept it despite the evidence-color, weight, appetite-that she is well. (Article 3)</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-04 20:27:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720720</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Body Par. #2</title>
         <author>skilarthomas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720721</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>Superiority </li><li>He controls everything</li><li>Men are above women</li></ul><div>Claims:</div><ul><li>The narrator's double-voiced discourse-the ironic understatements, asides, hedges, and negations through which she asserts herself against the power of John's voice - came for some critics to represent "women's language" or the "language of the powerless." (Article 1)</li><li> Earlier I named as the two basic gestures of U.S. feminist criticism "deconstructing dominant male patterns of thought and social practice" and "reconstructing female experience previously hidden or overlooked. (Article 1)</li><li>Reading or writing her self upon the wallpaper allows the narrator, as Paula Treichler puts it, to "escape" her husband's "sentence" and to achieve the limited freedom of madness which, virtually all these critics have agreed,  a kind of sanity in the face of the insanity of male dominance. (Article 1)</li><li>A feminist analysis moves beyond such localized<br>causes to implicate the economic and social conditions which, under patriarchy, make women domestic slaves. (Article 2)</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-04 20:27:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720721</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Body Par. #3</title>
         <author>skilarthomas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720722</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><ul><li>Freedoms </li><li>Women is trapped in room by husband </li><li>Cannot do what she pleases   </li></ul><div><br></div><div>Claims:</div><ul><li> it dictates the narrator's removal to the "ancestral halls" where the story is set and generates a medical therapeutic regimen that includes physical isolation, "phosphates or phosphites," air, and rest. Above all, it forbids her to "work." (Article 2)</li><li>The diagnostic language of the physician is coupled with the paternalistic language of the husband to create a formidable array of controls over her behavior. (Article 2)  </li><li>In the contemporary feminist reading, on the other hand, sexual oppression is evident from the start: the phrase "John says" heads a litany of "benevolent" prescriptions that keep the narrator infantilized, immobilized, and bored literally out of her mind (Article 1)</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-04 20:27:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720722</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Conclusion</title>
         <author>skilarthomas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720723</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Many critics agree that there is defiantly different roles between men and women in "The Yellow Wallpaper". They believe that women are inferior to men in intelligence, superiority, and freedoms. This was shown in what the critics had to say above</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-04 20:27:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720723</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Literary Theory Type</title>
         <author>skilarthomas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720726</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-04 20:27:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720726</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Examples/Instructions</title>
         <author>skilarthomas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720728</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li> "Brownies" by ZZ Packer, author and a claim describing what you discovered in researching your literary criticism type.  </li><li> As an African American woman,Packer uses the Brownie Troops to show her observations of her race using stereotypes to form hatred and jealousy. </li><li> The entire story is a simile for the societal issue of racism. On one hand we have a race that believes the other is rich and pretentious. And on the other hand we have a race that believes the other is poor and dirty.   </li><li>Information about one critical source</li><li>Report only and tie into literary criticism characteristics.</li><li>You are building ethos, credibility, by using the critics.</li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-04 20:27:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/skilarthomas/43peky6fos9n/wish/348720728</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
