NLC2_Secondary by GEB IvP

geb_ivp — 2024-07-22 06:23:17 UTC

geb_ivp — 2024-07-22 06:23:37 UTC

Group 1

geb_ivp — 2024-07-22 06:24:52 UTC

Process & Reason -

Product & Reason -

Group 1

geb_ivp — 2024-07-22 06:26:52 UTC

Process & Reason -

Product & Reason -

geb_ivp — 2024-07-26 06:13:51 UTC

Instructions

geb_ivp — 2024-07-26 07:06:03 UTC

Decide in your groups the scores for the process and product for each of the project. Provide reasons for your scores.

Room 1 (Case study 1)

2024-07-26 07:14:29 UTC

Process - 2 (some research is done on existing solutions and incorporating features from both solutions together. Not advisable to add new items to the car and may cause servicing issues. This area was not research thoroughly)

Product - 2 (not very useful because drivers will not want to use it. Not advisable to add new items to the car and may cause servicing issues.)

Group 3

2024-07-26 07:17:03 UTC

Process: (2- emergent)

Reiteration of prototypes not so strong --> not linked from one version to the next
Research conducted could've been done better to support the final prototype

Product: (2 - emergent)

No feedback from users
Prototype seems big - may not be able to hold card --> more research should be done for size of cards/posters people place on cars

Group 4

2024-07-26 07:21:56 UTC

Process - 2 (some evidence of research and weighing pros and cons)

Product - 2 (not so useful for car owners, position placed is not really in consideration of user needs - drivers' preference)

Group 4

2024-07-26 07:24:10 UTC

Process - 2 some missing link between research and generating ideas/refining ideas

Product - 2/3 (app interface looks good, more of good idea)

Group 3

2024-07-26 07:24:17 UTC

Process: 3 - flourishing

Background research on past solutions well done

Product: 2- emergent

Not completely new --> repackaging of of an existing idea

Room 2

2024-07-26 07:28:54 UTC

Case study 1:

Process- sorry, we didn't decide!

They seem to be mainly observations, not from literature review, surveys, interviews

Product-sorry, we didn't decide!

They do have a physical product that we can see how it may have worked compared to case study 2 which seem more theoretical as a paper/service prototype.

Case study 2

Process- sorry, we didn't decide!

Probably a 3, there was proper literature review, and surveys

Product-sorry, we didn't decide!

We are concerned about the number of iterations conducted and visualizing how it may worked.