The author utilizes interviews and open statements. There are four interviews from a few of the Kenyan workers, Sama workers, and several statements from OpenAI. I do believe the evidence was effective, but not appropriate. The point is to not be appropriate. Outsourced labor and graphic abuse are inherently an uncomfortable topic. The descriptions would likely impact the reader the most. You can throw numbers at a person, but it is experiences and stories that will make them somber.

I think that the article is well-written. I also think the version given for this assignment is heavily censored and does not have the same effect for its point without it. The paper version also omits certain information (such as the paragraph that mentioned Sama's work for Facebook, which is even less than what is being offered).

It is cruel that the workers in Kenya would look through vulgar imagery on such a basis. However, it is their job. They are getting paid to do a task, so their families are fed and their is livelihood paid for. When considering the absence of minimum wage, the bonuses offered per month, and that the rate of $2 was still higher than what Facebook is offering! Yes, the nature of the job may be traumatic, but many jobs of the post-modern age are traumatic or stressful. Abuse is a part of life; it is only censored for the first-world person. There will always be exposure to it because it is a part of life. Censorship of newer technology both on internet and artificial intelligence is crucial. You did it yourself when handing out the paper version removed of sexual abuse descriptions. You read the graphic interviews, exposing yourself to it, and then decided to censor it. By censoring the graphic descriptions, you are doing exactly what GPT moderation does, only on a softer scale.