https://padlet.com/vannahscarborough/3xlijfyaherz Be sure your answer is a full and thoughtful paragraph. en-us 2019-02-04 15:15:32 UTC 2025-10-27 15:52:30 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/vannahscarborough/3xlijfyaherz/wish/327484472 I think colonization is justified if it benefits the natives. However, the definition of "benefits" is subjective. From the perspective of a colonizer, specifically the English settlers of North America, they were benefiting the Natives by changing their "savage" society. In the case of the Boers in southern Africa, they were murdered and robbed of their diamonds. However, they were though to be benefited by the European colonization. ]]> 2019-02-04 19:06:55 UTC https://padlet.com/vannahscarborough/3xlijfyaherz/wish/327484472 https://padlet.com/vannahscarborough/3xlijfyaherz/wish/327484655 Only if one group doesn’t control the other. It’s cool if one group of people come in and help the native group (with permission if possible) but for one group to come into a place that is not theirs and take control and call it “helping” is bad. ]]> 2019-02-04 19:07:16 UTC https://padlet.com/vannahscarborough/3xlijfyaherz/wish/327484655 https://padlet.com/vannahscarborough/3xlijfyaherz/wish/327485420 I don't think that it's a problem unless the natives don't want help. I don't think that it's right to force the natives to receive help if they don't want it.]]> 2019-02-04 19:08:28 UTC https://padlet.com/vannahscarborough/3xlijfyaherz/wish/327485420