By just saying that I'm Mexican, many people could guess at first the typically stereotypes of being Mexican (which in many cases is true): I like to eat Tacos, I enjoy seeing and playing soccer, I'm hardworking, I like spicy food, I live in a Semidesert (Querétaro). But not all of these stereotypes apply to many of us, for example we don't transport ourselves in donkey or by horse, we don't wear our hat and Zarape, we don't carry with a weapon to all places, etc.

Apart from this, being Mexican includes a lot more things that what usually imagined, for example "El Día de Muertos" where in other places around the world is seen as something creepy, while in Mexico is a celebration to commemorate and remember the person we have lost but are still in our heart

But for showing a smaller example, one of my best friends, is the exactly same age as me, goes to the same school, lives here in Qro, is also a boy, thinks the same as about politics, has the same religion, but even though we share all of this, we are not the same, because of many experiences that we have lived.

I believe that for someone to be a relevant and important activist, that person needs to be open-minded. I feel that if someone has a closed mind, is unable to understand others point of view, and getting different approaches on how to solve a common problematic. A case of a recent activist who had a really closed mentality, could be Charlie Kirk, who was a conservative activist, and between other things, his actions and interviews with people of other point of views may have result in the hate towards him, which may also have resulted into his unfortunate death. Also, an activist must have a strong position over the topic, being able to hold or argue their points of view with scientific or logical facts, which in other case may result into failure of moving the social masses into a same action.

I would say, that at first, start a dialogue between the two factions or the opposite ideas (whenever this is possible). By starting a dialogue, it has a higher probability to get an outcome that could benefit both parts. While doing this, it would be important to clear that most of these procedures take a long time, so it's a key element to search for the patience of the participants, and this is where communities make a big difference, mainly because is more probable for a person to act when part of a community than when someone is alone.

On the contrary side, artists could also make a disruption in the status quo, when this only benefits one of the sides, and making the society have a clear view over the scene. This should also be measured, because where there is a high level of disruption or a big revolution, the most probable outcome would be to have a war or a bloody revolution which would in fact the opposite result of what was intended.

I believe, that globalization can change the way of expression of the artists all around the world. By, traveling to other places, it's possible to assimilate small parts of their culture (it also depends on the region and the amount of time someone visits it), and when they get back to their place of origin, integrate this kind of behavior, ideals in their own way of expressing themselves. An example of this, is the Japan-Mexican culture seen in class, where many artists who learnt or visited Mexico and went back to Japan, fell in love with the culture, and wanted to integrate or share it with other Japanese, even though it isn't as popular or beloved as they would wish it was. So, this in fact, gives the artist, the liberty to select the style and format in which they can express their ideas and emotions, without being conditioned to an only style.