These 2 characters are the first to arrive at a Clergy Summit meeting to be held there. A murder has occurred in the monastery and the abbot asks Brother Williams to try to solve the case but without entering the majestic library, they are more fearful for their lives due to the murders than in the monastery that were happening at that time, but only the holy inquisition could intervene, even so the monk and his assistant Adso seek and investigate using the scientific method, putting into practice deductive reasoning to find the answer to the mysterious deaths of the monks of the monastery.

The members of this abbey (these represent the type of religion that prevailed in the fourteenth century) related these events to some evil entity or a diabolical act. Apparently at first it was the key point or the statement that they were not suicides, but murders, it is with the death of the young Greek translator monk that the monks hide various details, such as the only copy of a book by Aristotle, in which there is talk of laughter, which is prohibited in the monastery. This particular element is the one that generated these events and will continue to cause deaths since it is a representation of knowledge, which is in a fight against dogmatism (the first defends free will and the freedom to know and the second seeks faith without questioning, blind and obedient belief). For this reason, the monks do not want Guillermo to investigate too much so they try to scare him with an apparent accident and later, Brother Berengar steals his glasses along with the aforementioned book. The next day, Berengar was found dead in the monastery baths.

Brother Williams believed that dangerous spiritual books existed, so he believed that this book was the cause of the death of the three previous monks. Williams and Adso decide to enter the library (it was forbidden for anyone to enter it) through a secret passage. This library was a labyrinth of traps that the librarian knew perfectly despite his blindness and that they did not show anyone in order to protect their mysteries, but this would end there as a representative of the Inquisition named Bernardo Ghi arrives, who has the des Fortunio that when they found a young woman stealing food, there were also black cats and dead chickens in that place, making them believe that she was a witch and that she was the cause of the monks' deaths. For the abbots and the inquisition, the woman was nothing but a mistake in the world. They were the source of all evil, and they believed that the devil worked through them to drive men away from the faith.

The monk who murdered was in some way taking revenge and stealing what was stolen from the people (the relationship between the church and the people was a clear reference to the colonial situation, which is the domination imposed by a racially and culturally different foreign minority , acting in the name of a racial or ethnic and cultural superiority, dogmatically affirmed, causing the colonized to test the colonial situation as an enterprise of material and spiritual dispossession), but at the same time enjoyed committing murder. So, he was considered a heretic. He made a false confession that had to do with the devil, since he was forced on the basis of torture, while he was publicly interrogated. Still, Brother Williams defended him saying that he was innocent and that convicting him would not solve the problem.

Brother Williams predicted and it was reason for them to be inclined to think that he was the murderer and they began their search, but at that moment he was worried about reaching the library and discovering the mysteries that were in the largest library that he has seen in his life. As he approached, he came across the copy of Aristotle's book, which was considered his reward for having gone beyond what others could have found in that labyrinth full of traps. But that book hid a secret, it was poisoned, however, Williams used one of his gloves and problem solved. In the end, Brother Williams discovered the oldest monk in the monastery, which was the one who caused the fire in the library where he lost his life and at the same time most of the books were lost, only the books and scrolls that saved the monk Williams.

-What are the everyday actions/behaviour that we can carry out?
Can you connect the incident with the movie "The help"?See the coincidences and the differences with the society in that time and nowadays

We have to understand once and for all that this type of discrimination, not only in the United States, but everywhere, is an unacceptable act. There are many cases similar to those of Floyd which were not as recognized as the one mentioned above, and will simply be forgotten. We need to realize and do something about the suffering people involved in these racial acts go through.

1)_ If he’d been careful, he wouldn’t broke the window

2)_ if you hadn’t studied, you wouldn’t have passed

3)_ what would you have done if you hadn't been ill

activity 11: 

1)_ If he had worked hard, he would do much better

2)_ if i weren't so busy, i would go out last night

3)_ you would have more money if you hadn’t bought so many clothes

4)_ she wouldn't go to prison if she hadn't stolen the car

5)_ who would they meet if they hadn't gone to the party?

activity 12:

1)_ If he hadn't joined the police force, he wouldn't become a famous detective

2)_ If he hadn't gone to college, he wouldn't have graduated

3)_ If he had left school at 16, he wouldn’t have joined the police force.

4)_ If he hadn't graduated, he wouldn't have been able to go to college

5)_ If he hadn't passed his exams, he wouldn't go to college

Page 127, activity 41:

1)_ if he hadn’t stolen the money the police wouldn’t have arrested him

2)_ if I had studied more, I’d have got a higher mark

3)_ he wouldn't have shoplifted if he hadn't lost his job

4)_ i’d have phoned you if I’d known it was your birthday 

5)_ you’d have met my American cousins if you’d come to the cinema with us 

activity 42:

1)_ if i had gone to bed early i wouldn't be so tired

2)_ if they had trained harder, they would win the match  

3)_ my teacher hadn't got angry if my classmates would be quiet

4)_ we hadn’t broken the window if Paul wouldn’t kick the ball

activity 43:

1)_ if my mum hadn’t left school when she was 16, she would go to university

2)_ if she had filled in the application form correctly, she would get the job 

3)_ if the detectives hadn’t looked for clues, they wouldn’t solve the crime

4)_ if they had bought the tickets. They would see the concert 

Assignment 27/4:

"The United California Bank Robbery"( pages 92/93):

1_ what I learned from the first paragraph is that detectives use fingerprints or DNA a lot to find clues

2_ the mistakes the thieves made were:

     a_ go rob the wrong bank

     b_ rob a second bank

     c_ leaving fingerprints on dirty dishes

     d_ have flown together

3_ I don't think those people are seasoned thieves, for the simple fact that they made all those mistakes that led to their imprisonment.

4_ in California they managed to steal a sum of US $ 12 million

5_ the fingerprints were found on dirty dishes that were in his hiding place

6_ the police caused these people to know each other because in addition to their fingerprints coinciding, they were traveling by plane together.

c_ We use must when we believe something is definitely true

 

2) 1_ He must be a smuggler/I’m almost certain he’s a smuggler

2_ He might be a smuggler/I think it’s possible he’s a smuggler

3_ He can’t be a smuggler/I’m almost certain he’s not a smuggler 

 

3) 1_She speaks French and has a French passport/She must be French 

2_ She used to live in Paris/She may be French

3_ Joanne hates dogs! A dog bit her when she was a child/That can’t be her dog

4_ I think Sheila likes dogs, but I’m not sure/That could be Sheila’s dog

5_ I think I saw him on television yesterday/He might be an actor

6_ He’s in that new film we saw last week!/He must be a famous actor 

 

4) 1_ He can’t be guilty. He’s never committed a crime in his life!

2_ There could be a dog in that bag. It’s moving

3_ You must be hungry. It’s 4 pm and you haven’t had lunch

4_ He might be American. He speaks English

5_ Ask john. He might know the answer

6_ This film’s terrible. You can’t like it 

Page 91: 

6) 1_ he might be going on a date

2_ he must be lifting boxes

3_ she could be texting her friend

4_ he can't be healthy

5_ she must be sad

 

Upgrade:

1_ no, it can’t be him

2_ why not? He might live near here

3_ well, he could be here making a film

4_he can’t be Vince. He’s wearing glasses

5_ he might wear glasses in real life. Hey, look he’s coming this way

6_i must be lost. Can you help me?

7_ yes, I am. You must watch Crime Squad

Negative Sentences:
subject + "had" + "not" + past participle...

Interrogative Sentences:
"had" + subject + past participle...?

Uses:
_We use the past perfect to refer to an action or event that began in the past and that is prior to another action also in the past. The action that occurred first is in the past perfect and the one that follows is in the past simple.

_It is used for actions that occurred before a specific time in the past.

_Also, as in the present perfect, with some verbs we use the past perfect for situations that began in the past and continued to a specific point in the past.

To express regret for not having performed an action in the past.

indicates possibility or ability in the past.

May:
Like "could", "may" is used to indicate possibilities in the future.

Might:
"Might" is used to indicate possibilities in the present or the future. In these cases, it is a synonym for "may."

Will:
"will" is used to form the future tense.
Also the use of "will" means will or determination.

Shall:
"Shall" is used as "will" to form the future tense.

Should:
"Should" indicates an obligation or recommendation. It reflects an opinion about what is correct.

Must:
"Must" indicates an obligation, prohibition or necessity.

Would:
"Would" is used to declare a preference and to ask for something politely.