<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Assignment 2 - World Mysteries by Andrea Gilpin</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m</link>
      <description>Andrea Gilpin</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:16:21 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-11-04 20:04:02 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Post #1 Assignment 2: Amelia Earhart Disappearance</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365527535</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Made by Andrea Gilpin, working individually</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:19:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365527535</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #2 Video</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365531529</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: </strong>This video is about bones that were found on Gardner Island in 1940 just 400 miles away from where Amelia was planning on making a stop over. Dr. David Winn said that based on photos the skeleton found met the dimensions of Amelia. <strong><br></strong><br><strong>Connection: </strong>This relates to <strong>appeal to authority</strong> because they seem to believe these bones are Amelia's even though no scientific method was applied to prove this. They think that because a prominent doctor said they are definitely a match to Earhart's then they must be hers. No DNA testing or proven scientific testing was done to prove the match, they were simply just compared to photos of Earhart. <strong>Critical thinking </strong>would help uncover biases and identify alternatives before deciding what happened to Amelia. This also relates to <strong>simplicity</strong> because the video asks "who else would have been travelling in that area?" and "who else would also just happen to have bones that appeared to be hers?" They are thinking of the simple answer instead of evaluating all the different possibilities. The video also connects to the <strong>pseudoscience watchlist</strong>, deliberately creates mystery by mentioning another popular theory and asking what theories everyone else believes.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://youtu.be/QzkaOSX6vYM" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:21:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365531529</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #3 Video</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365535316</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: </strong>This video is an interview of a man who claims to have found a piece of Amelia Earhart's plane. He is an Earhart enthusiast and investigator. He believes the theory that Earhart landed in the Marshall Islands and was kidnapped by the Japanese.<strong> <br></strong><br><strong>Connection: </strong>This relates to the reason for belief, <strong>emotional connection</strong> because Dick has invested a lot of time researching the Amelia Earhart disappearance and has a strong emotional investment in his search. He is more likely to believe in the theory mentioned in the video because he feels connected to the search and has found what he believes to be a crucial piece of evidence. <strong>Critical thinking</strong> should be applied when deciding whether the piece of metal he found was a part of Earhart's plane or not. The metal could have been from another plane especially since there were many other planes very similar to Earhart's running at that time. A <strong>fault</strong> in this video is that the photo used as evidence, also mentioned in post #8, was later debunked as being taken long before Earhart's journey.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://youtu.be/Dwi38pp94Eo" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:22:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365535316</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #4 Video</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365536538</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: </strong>This video is from a Discovery Channel documentary that explains that the radio distress calls from Earhart before her disappearance proves she didn't crash at sea. <strong><br></strong><br><strong>Connection: </strong>This relates to the reason for belief of <strong>perception and observation</strong>. In the video a woman named Betty claims to have heard a distress call from Amelia Earhart saying that she needed help and was going to emergency land on an Island that had a ship wreck. The distress call was two hours long and even though Betty was taking notes she could have perceived the called incorrectly. She mentioned in the video that she couldn't fully understand some of what was being said but she thinks she may have been repeating New York City. This was interpreted as Amelia actually saying Norwich City, which was then later used to attempt to connect this distress call with Nikumaroro Island. This also relates to <strong>confirmation bias</strong> as the distress call was unclear but theorists found a way to relate it back to and support their theory that Amelia crashed on Nikumaroro. Betty could have heard these things on the broken and fuzzy radio call due to <strong>patternicity</strong> because we have a tendency to find patterns in meaningless noise.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://youtu.be/2GTQG3PELsI" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:22:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365536538</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #5 Website</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365540418</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: </strong>This website describes<strong> </strong>the disappearance of Amelia Earhart being an alien abduction. The webpage is an interview between a professor and a 'higher being'/'entity'. The website encourages you to share the information with friends and covers topics such as, mysteries, spiritual concepts, messages of light, and secrets of history.&nbsp; <br><br><strong>Connection: </strong>This website connects to <strong>agenticity </strong>because it claims that extraterrestrials forcefully abducted Amelia Earhart, took her to another world and cryogenically froze her. It also connects to the red flag of <strong>mystical energy</strong> because the writer of this post believes they are communicating with all knowing entities of light. This also relates back to <strong>agenticity </strong>because the writer has assigned meaning to these entities of light as views them as a higher being. <strong>Critical thinking</strong> and <strong>skepticism</strong> would be highly beneficial when viewing information on this website to uncover other reasons for Amelia's disappearance. Through critical thinking we can find that this website also correlates with the <strong>pseudoscience watchlist</strong>, convinces by faith and belief. The person who conducted this interview doesn't ask for any evidence to back up this theory and instead believes this theory to be true because he believes in this entity of light and thinks it is all knowing. A <strong>limitation</strong> of this website is that it is a blog and anybody can write whatever they want and most blogs are based on opinion.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://unveiledsecretsandmessagesoflight.blogspot.com/2009/04/amelia-earhart-exupery.html" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:23:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365540418</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #6 Website</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365543387</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: </strong>In 2019, Scott Waring claimed to have found Earhart's plane on Google Maps. The website is a blog post about how Waring found Earhart's plane and what he believes happened to her. <br><br><strong>Connection: </strong>This website connects to the <strong>unexplained</strong> because it explains where Amelia's plane is, what may have happened to her, and claims that the case is 100% solved. We still can't fully explain what happened to Earhart due to a lack of information and technology, which can cause create their own conclusions. It would be useful to apply<strong> critical thinking</strong> while evaluating the theory that Amelia crash landed on the island of Palmyra. Going through this process may help to identify the red flag, <strong>confusion of causation and correlation</strong>. Waring believes that the CIA was making Amelia photograph military activity over some islands and about 5 years after her disappearance they built a runway and a U.S. base on Palmyra Island; therefore this must be where Amelia crashed and he really did find her plane. A <strong>fault</strong> in this theory is that the website is blog making it an opinion piece with no scientific evidence to back it up. The Google Maps photo also cannot be proven to be accurate and there were many differences between the plane Waring claimed to have found and Amelia's plane, such as three bladed propellers vs. two bladed propellers.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.etdatabase.com/2019/09/hey-i-found-amelia-earharts-plane-using.html" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:24:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365543387</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #7 Website</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365544685</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: </strong>This website describes the Irene Bolam and Amelia Earhart theory. There are many pages full of 'evidence' as to why Irene Bolam was actually Amelia Earhart. It appears to be written by one person and is entirely based on information collected by writer and investigative journalist, Tod Swindell.<strong><br></strong><br><strong>Connection: </strong>This website connects to the <strong>unexplained</strong> because it explains that Earhart never disappeared and she actually lived on as Irene Bolam. Applying the <strong>critical thinking</strong> process and <strong>skepticism</strong> to the information listed on the website, especially recognizing assumptions, emotions and&nbsp; biases would be very useful. Applying critical thinking would help uncover other reasons for belief including, <strong>agenticity</strong>.&nbsp; For example the author of this website believes that the government helped Amelia escape from the Japanese and change her identity. A <strong>flaw</strong> of this website is that it appears to be written by one person with one opinion and little to no solid evidence. This also relates to the red flag <strong>confirmation bias </strong>because both the author of the website and others coming to the website for information are only looking for evidence that supports the theory that Earhart and Bolam are the same person.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.irene-amelia.com/index.html" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:25:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365544685</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #8 Picture</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365546025</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: </strong>This photo started circulating a few years ago that claimed to depict Earhart and Noonan on a dock on Mili Atoll in the Marshall Islands. This photo perpetuated the theory that Amelia landed somewhere in the Marshall Islands, which was controlled by Japan, and she and Noonan were captured and executed. <br><br><strong>Connection: </strong>This photo connects to the Red Flag <strong>confirmation bias</strong> because people used the photo to support their own theory about Amelia Earhart's disappearance. Theorists tried to find every possible reason as to why the photo was in fact of Amelia and linking it to their reasoning for her disappearance. It would have been useful to apply <strong>critical thinking</strong> and <strong>skepticism </strong>when the photo first emerged instead of immediately jumping to conclusions since the photo was later found to have been taken in Palau and was from a Japanese travel guide from 1935. Therefore the photo predated Amelia Earhart's final flight.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/1001957904/bd48de052040696ed8d5d342dbc6257b/ameliaearhart.webp" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:25:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365546025</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #9 Picture</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365548342</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: </strong>The Japanese capture theory turned into another theory that Earhart was captured by the Japanese but not executed - instead she was returned to the U.S. under an alias. It's believed that she assumed the identity of Irene Bolam, who many think bore a strong physical resemblance to Amelia Earhart.<strong> </strong><br><br><strong>Connection: </strong>This photo connects to the reason for belief, <strong>Agenticity</strong> because this theory has gone as far as becoming a conspiracy theory. Some people believe that Amelia's identity change was done in secret and that President Franklin Roosevelt helped her do it. This also relates to the red flag <strong>Suppression by Authorities </strong>because there have been many claims that the government knew what had happened to Amelia and they refused to disclose this information to the public. There are many <strong>flaws</strong> in this theory, the most prominent being the overwhelming amount of evidence that they are not the same person including, Irene's pilot license, marriage certificates, and the clear differences in appearance.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/1001957904/7710950b111f74b920f068d9e0688c2d/bolam.webp" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:26:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365548342</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #10 Picture</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365551059</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: </strong>A photo taken three months after Amelia's disappearance of Nikumaroro Island. Something poking out of the water on the edge of the photo, known as The Bevington Object, is believed by some to be the landing gear of Earhart’s plane. People believe that Amelia lived out the rest of her life on Nikumaroro Island. <strong><br></strong><br><strong>Connection: </strong>Although many things have turned up on Nikumaroro Island that suggest someone was living there, such as buttons and a mirror, this picture relates to the <strong>pseudoscience watchlist</strong> of results can't be reproduced or verified. An independent review of the photo by intelligence analysts at the Pentagon had suggested that the object looked like plane landing gear however there was no way to know for sure or prove if that's actually what was in the photo. There was also no way to know if the landing gear even belonged to Earhart's plane. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/1001957904/0d145171ab41c86b91bbed402d46a6af/article_2124032_12708CBA000005DC_805_308x185.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:27:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365551059</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #11 Reflective Responses</title>
         <author>andreagilpin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365553475</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. What did you learn about the topic that most surprised you?<br><br>While researching the disappearance of Amelia Earhart I was most surprised to find out just how many different theories there are and how easily one theory can spawn into another. For example, the Irene Bolam conspiracy theory came into existence because so many people believed that Earhart had been kidnapped by the Japanese. The theory so quickly jumped from a plausible idea to an extreme version of the theory.<br><br></div><div>2. Provide a real-life example of how this topic is relevant or interesting for you.<br><br>I chose this topic because Amelia was so much more than just a disappearance theory. She was a pioneer in the aviation industry, an author and an inspiration to many women. I was interested to learn more about the theories behind her disappearance to get a better understanding of why people are mostly interested in finding out what happened to her instead of focusing on the extraordinary things she accomplished in life.&nbsp;<br><br>3. Which research did you find most interesting?&nbsp; Why?<br><br>The research that I found most interesting was the findings on Nikumaroro Island. Many artifacts were found on the island that were made in America and could have belonged to Earhart. The most compelling artifact found was a jar of anti-freckle cream that Earhart was known to use. Although there could have been other reasons as to why those things were found on the Island, the theory that she crash landed and was a castaway on Nikumaroro Island appears to be the most likely of theories that are currently out there.&nbsp;<br><br>4. What are you most likely to remember from this research?<br><br>I am most likely to remember from this research how damaging conspiracy theories can be and just how out of control they can get. Irene Bolam's life became entirely consumed by the theory that she was Earhart and her privacy was invaded for years following. Most people after her death continue to believe that she was Earhart almost erasing the person she actually was. <br><br>5. Having completed all the course content, which pseudoscience belief do you think is most harmful?&nbsp; Which is least harmful? &nbsp;<br><br>Having completed all the course content, I believe that the pseudoscience belief relating ideologies is the most harmful. I think its dangerous that some people won't go see a doctor when they are ill because it's against their beliefs can be very dangerous especially when they have a very young child who is sick. In cases like this you cannot just pray away an illness. This belief can also put others at risk. For example, people who don't believe in vaccinations are not only putting their own children at risk they are also putting others at risk.&nbsp;<br><br>The pseudoscience belief that I think is the least harmful is mystical energy. I think there is little harm in people using crystals or "energy" healing to make themselves feel better. Your health is also greatly related to your mental state so if people believe mystical energy is helping them heal, then in a way it is, because they are more likely to have a positive mindset that is beneficial to their overall health. On the flip side, if mystical energy isn't doing anything at all then it still isn't harming anyone (unless they're trying to use it for serious health issues but in most cases people don't).&nbsp;<br><br>6. If you could pass on your knowledge to a family member or friend, what do you think is the most important thing to pass on?</div><div><br>The most important thing to pass on from this course is how to apply the critical thinking process. Critical thinking applies to so many things in life not just pseudoscience. It's especially useful now with the state of the world and the differing opinions on how to manage the virus and whether or not you should get the vaccine. I've already heard so many rumors about the vaccine and if some people just applied critical thinking I believe there would be so much less confusion and false information spreading around.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-29 19:27:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/andreagilpin/3rzxfsqtniuqw69m/wish/1365553475</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
