2. The movies are not always true to the text be they remove details.

3. The liberties do not make it better.

4. Usually not.

2. sometimes movies are true to the novel, depending on who directed it, but it usually leaves out most details

3. some liberties are taken to help describe the situation, but others are not because they are less important

4. some things are more present than others

2. Movies are not always true to how the author wants them to be conveyed.

3. Liberties are not always better and tend to weaken the movie.

4. Usually the authors purpose isn't present in the making of the movie.

2. Some movies are true to the original story but most deviate away from the authors original text.

3. The movie version leaves out some details and it makes the story more vague and not as clear.

4. The authors vision is still present in the movie version

2. They change it all to fit a certain time limit.

3.

2. No, movies are not true to authors sometimes because they change something's in the novel or they take or leave things out.

3. Liberties are taken because they leave out important points of the novel.

4. Sometimes the authors vision is present in the movie because some directors use a lot of things from the book and some directors leave out things.

2. Most movies stay true for the main events, but not really for minor events.

3. Some characters are taken away and the movie has a new ending, but the ending was actually a better thing to include.

4. The author's vision is present in the movie.

2. The movies change from the book because it is hard to fit a long book in to a 2 hour movie.

3. They take away things and change thing from the book, the book has more details and the movies take some of those away.

4. Most things that the author writes are present but they take some little things that most people wouldn't notice because it has to be a certain time li

2. Movies aren't true to how the author writes it because they change it to try to make it more interesting.

3. Liberties sometimes mess the movie up but it also makes it better sometimes

4. It is some of the time but not the other

2 no movies take certain things and change them

3 certain liberties are taken sometimes they are good but others they aren't

4 a little bit of the authors vision is present but they did change a few things to make it more watchable for audiences.

No. They change them to conserve time.

The usually make them worse.

No.

2.Sometimes movies are true to authors and their books.

3.The liberties taken can make the movies more interesting but can distort the meaning.

4. The authors vision is present in the movie, it still pushes Revolution.

2. No, the the movies shorten the book and leave out great detail.

3. The book has more detail compared to the movie. The movie leaves out big points and moods. In the book something may be like this and in the book it would be a whole different thing

4. The authors vision usually is not in the movie because the director of the movie may not know exactly what the author was trying to say

2.some movies are. Most I've read aren't tho.

3.

4. I believe the authors vision is present.

2. They change it to make it fit in a certain time limit.

3. They changed some of the things from the book in the movie, some things were just left out.

4. At some points the authors vision is present, but there are some points where I think he might have wanted it a little different.