Dear John,
Hi! How it's going? Thanks for your resent letter. I' m writing in connection with the fact that this weekend my family and I were in Paris. I really want to tell you about this fantastic holiday.
 We were very tired of retrace and we decided to get away.The flight there was so long! My dad and I watched couple of films. We set off at 8 o'clock to manage to get around all the sights. Besides, we stayed in hostel to saved money for shopping. To tell you the truth, there was lots of things to do in Paris. I suppose that my favorite moment was when we walked around the night city. It was really fairytale-like! Actually, Paris is really beautiful and atmospheric city and I really like the elderly inhabitants of this city. They were really friendly and pretty. Nevertheless, I just fell in love with croissants.
Can you tell me about your plans for the weekend? Do you like France? Do you want to get some pictures from me, don't you?
Now I must be off. I look forward to hearing from you soon. 
Yours,
Ksjusha

So, I agree with the point of view that city life is better than life out of town. 

In my opinion, people who live in a big city have really great opportunities for living. Firstly there are a lot of work places. Each of them can find something for their selves and do what they like. Secondly all students in city can get good education in local university. They are really lucky because high education has huge influence at the future.

But on the other hand, there are a lot of good of living in rural areas. For example there are special programs to support young specialists. Usually there is no competition in rural areas and young people can realize their selves after studying.

However I cannot agree with this opinion because unfortunately there aren’t special programs for adult. There is one big problem of living out of town – lack of work places. Not everyone adult can find a job to their liking and do what they want.

To sum up I’d like to say that there are pros and cons of living in the big city and rural areas. The biggest problem in city is a big competition and the poser of rural area is lack of work places. Anyway, in my opinion, life in city is more suitable than live out of town.

Nevertheless, there is a contrary pout of view. Some people believe that it's better to live in a village and they have really weighty arguments. The first reason is programms to support young specialist. There some interesting protects to improve villages which are sponsored by the authorities and it's a really good chance to show your professionalism. Besides, in a village you have more free time. It's really great because you can easily avoid rat race and ceep calm. 
However, I cannot agree with this opinion. Despite of other people's opinion I still think that villages have big problem. This problem is lack of workplaces because for the village do not need a lot of specialists in various fields and the choice of professions is very limited. Moreover, living in a village is really boring because there are lack of interesting places and events.
In conclusion I want to say that there are totally different opinion about residence and everyone chooses what suits him.

So, I agree with the point of view that studying abroad is great opportunity to get great education.

In my opinion, living abroad can be great fun and it broadens your perspective on life. First thinks first, you can learn another language. Even if you are not studying that particular language on your study course, it may be useful later when you are looking for employment, or in your personal life. Second thinks second, you may have better study opportunities abroad than you do at home. You may be able to do a course that you couldn’t do in your home country, or be able to study at a college or university that specializes in your chosen area of study. 

But there are some negative states of studying abroad. For instance, you may well experience culture shock. You will find lots of things are very different when you actually live there. 

However I cannot agree with this opinion because travelling broadens the mind and finding out about other cultures can be fascinating. It can also give you insights and perspective on your home culture.

To sum up I’d like to say that there are pros and cons of studying abroad. The fact that you have lived and studied abroad shows that you possess valuable workplace qualities such as independence, initiative, and resilience. It also shows that you are not afraid of a challenge and that you can be adaptable. 

In my opinion, there are some reasons why it is a great thing.  Firstly, it is easier to pass exams with flying colours, because you get more attention from teachers when you study at home. Secondly, teachers can correct your mistakes immediately and give extra-information about a subject which is your weakness.

By the way, it is very convenient, as you can study at any time you want. Do not forget we are different, so if someone wakes up in the morning easy, the other wakes up only in the afternoon. That is why it is very important to have the individual approach.

On other hand, we can notice the disadvantages of homeschooling. The main one is the cost. It is expensive, because parents have to hire the teachers, despite the fact that schools provide it free. Also, there is a lack of motivation, as it is difficult to make yourself study at home, unlike schools, because there is timetable and an organized education system.

All in all, homeschooling is everyone’s business. There are a lot of advantages and disadvantages, so any decision will be right if the students get good education.

There are two opposite opinions about homeschooling. Some people think that it is good idea to study at home, while others believe that it is defective. Who is right? 

So, I agree with the point of view that homeschooling is OK, and you can have no health problems to study at home. 

In my opinion, people who learn at home have really great opportunities to have good education. Firstly, you can concentrate on yourself. There aren’t any students around you, who can distract from studying. Secondly, you can study at any time. You can choose time for study that helps you plan and do more. Thirdly, you have more attention from tutors. It is easier for teachers to look on the one person than all class. 
 
 But there are some negative states of homeschooling. For example, you can have lack of motivation. It is difficult to make yourself work at home. 

However I cannot agree with this opinion, because if person has a desire to learn at great university, he’ll oblige himself to read books and study hard. 

To sum up, I’d like to say that there are pros and cons of homeschooling. At home you can have great opportunities to have good education. But the most important thing – you need to be self-dependent. 

To my mind, studying abroad gives a lot of opportunities. For example, you can learn a foreign language, even though you do not study it on a course. Of course, it opens to the prospect, so it may be useful in future.

Also, living abroad can be great fun and it broadens your perspective on life. You can make new friends, get new experience and even a workplace. Because of the last many people want to study abroad.

Unfortunately, there are a lot of minuses. Firstly, it is not easy to learn a new language and start talking fluently. Secondly, making new friends takes time and at first you will be alone, even getting support from relatives. Thirdly, you must be a master of what you do if you want to work abroad, because none is waiting for us.

To sum up, I think if you are useful in your country, you should not move on, because you can not earn all money and you can not reach everything. By the way, you should understand your opportunities to study abroad and should not build the castles in the air.

But, on the other hand, It may be very expensive because you might need to pay not only for education but also for living, transport, food etcetera. In addition you  may find yourself feeling alone without any of the social and emotional support from relatives. But speaking for myself, It is not a huge problem for me, because I can get in touch with my relative and friends and visit them at times.

To sum up, I would like to say, that where is better to study depends on individual preference and opportunities. But if you interested in another culture and mentality and you want to have more opportunities for the future, you should to study abroad.   

Of course, homeschooling has a lot of meaningful advantages. Firstly, when you study at home, you have more attention from your teacher or tutor and he/she has individual approach to you, so it helps you to absorb the material faster. Secondly  you can concentrate on yourself and your education and then it is easier to pass the exams with the flying colors.

But there are some aspects, which raise the question « is it a good way ?» Let’s think why!

When you  do not go to school like ordinary kids, it is difficult to make yourself, working at home face-to-face. It can lead to lack of motivation. Moreover,  you may have a poor opportunities of socialization as you do not communicate with your peers. It also can be quite expensive.

So, in conclusion I want to say, that there are two opinions. If you want to study more effective, you can do it with the personal tutor at home, but you should know, that it can cause the problems with socialization.

Living at smart home gives a big opportunity to do what people want. The smart home does the household duties itself such as wash the floors or dishes, so people have more free time and can do sports or hobbies. As a result, they will be happier as they need not to do that they do not like. 

It can sound wrong but living at a smart home is cheaper than at ordinary home, because the smart home saves energy, water and heating, they also can reuse the wasted water or get the alternative energy from the sun or wind. Firstly you, of course, should pay a lot to live at a smart home but then it will pay off.

However, people can be lazy if they live at a smart home. They will forget how to cook dinner or how to switch on the washing machine, they can be fat because they will like doing nothing. As a result, they will forget the easiest thing or duties and the future generation will be even stupid.

As for me, I would like to live at a smart home, because it is a great thing to make our life more easily and more comfortable. If people want to be lazy, they will be lazy everywhere. The smart home helps people to do their own thing. 

Firstly, computer is an indispensable source of information. Cyclopedias reference books dictionaries are available to everyone at any time of day. Secondly, you can communicate with a person from another country. You can make a friend from any part of the world.

However, child, who spends all his time on computer, can become dependent. Dependence destroys the child's psyche and he can become aggressive. Besides, owning a computer can be expensive. Maintenance requires money.

To sum up, I think computers are essential part of our life. Many of us can not imagine their lives without technologies.  Computers make our life easier and more interesting. But we should not lose our head. Everything has a measure.

Nowadays there are two opposite opinions about risky sport. Some people think that it is interesting event, while others believe that it is so dangerous.

So, I agree with the point of view that it is very dangerous and it is better to avoid it.

In my opinion, people may be severely injured. Sometimes may become physically handicapped or can die. Besides, it is expensive. All these sports need to have special equipment and glasses which can cost a lot.

But there are some positive states of risky sport. For instance, any kind of adventure sport develops competitive spirit. It is very interesting to compete with anyone or with yourself. 

However I cannot agree with this opinion because you can compete with someone in any other sport and it does not have to be dangerous. 

To sum up I’d like to say that risky sport can be really interesting but it is not worth it. We have got only one life and we cannot so just risk it.

Firstly, dangerous sport is a great thing to challenge yourself, especially for diffident and shy people. This kind of sport helps them to build their self-confident and to be strong in front of danger. This way, people will be more confident, also they can overcome their scares and get by any disasters.

Secondly, dangerous sport is a cause for telling cool stories. When people do risky sport, they get the amazing experience and unforgettable memories. So, because of this unusual kind of sport people get a great opportunity to memorize the avid events and tell them to friends or children.

On the other hand, dangerous sport can lead to the death! This kind of sport includes some special equipment and complicated instructions, so people sometimes break the rules and injury themselves. Unfortunately, one wrong step or one wrong choice can be fatal.

I disagree with this opposite side of view, because each kind of sport can dangerous if a person does not follow the rules.

All in all, it is a choice of each person to take up the dangerous sports like a way to keep fit, but everyone should be attentive and understand what he or she does, because one wrong decision can be the last.

So, I agree with the point of view that sport stars can be imitations.

In my opinion sport people motivate to a healthy lifestyle. They help to work hard to reach your aim. Moreover they give money for a charity. A lot of sportsmen visit hospitals and tell interesting stories to the fans.

But there are some positive states of sport people. For instance a lot of teenagers compare themselves with sportsmen. At the sight of sports bodies teenagers’ self-esteem falls.

However I cannot agree with this opinion because people can be motivated by sportsmen but people should understand that we are different and we have got different bodies. 

To sum up I’d like to say that sport stars are good role models for young people because they can be good examples and reason of motivation for them.

Firstly, graffiti is a good thing, because it makes grey buildings brighter. Modern cities are a stone jungle, so this kind of art raises people’s mood when they look at it, as it is better to see some cool pictures than boring walls. 

Secondly, graffiti helps to express yourself. Some people are introvert and they have some difficulties to make friends or talk with somebody. Only art, especially graffiti, helps them to show themselves, because it is always avid and eye-catching!

On other hand, people attitude to graffiti not seriously, they consider it is only for teenagers and it is just for fun, because an old person cannot do this, as he should work…

I disagree with this opinion, because every hobby can be a dream job, every hobby is serious for someone and there is no age limit to do something.

All in all, graffiti is art that broadens our mind, so this cannot destroy anything, because art only creates beauty.

Firstly, graffiti is a good thing, because it makes grey buildings brighter. Modern cities are a stone jungle, so this kind of art raises people’s mood when they look at it, as it is better to see some cool pictures than boring walls. 

Secondly, graffiti helps to express yourself. Some people are introvert and they have some difficulties to make friends or talk with somebody. Only art, especially graffiti, helps them to show themselves, because it is always avid and eye-catching!

On other hand, people attitude to graffiti not seriously, they consider it is only for teenagers and it is just for fun, because an old person cannot do this, as he should work…

I disagree with this opinion, because every hobby can be a dream job, every hobby is serious for someone and there is no age limit to do something.

All in all, graffiti is art that broadens our mind, so this cannot destroy anything, because art only creates beauty.

So, I agree with the point of view that graffiti make cities more colorful.

In my opinion graffiti makes grey cities brighter. Bright pictures make the city more interesting and alive. Moreover it helps artists express themselves. Artists feel more confident when they see that viewers like their works.

But there are some negative states of graffiti. For instance sometimes it is illegal. Some artists do not have special rights to paint on the walls and therefore they often face the law.

However I cannot agree with this opinion because you can formalize the right to paint and make this world brighter legally.

To sum up I’d like to say that graffiti is a kind of art that helps people express themselves and make this world brighter.

I agree with this opinion and I think that space exploration is the main invention of this century.  Firstly, if people do not discover the area, we cannot use our mobile phones, because they work thanks to satellite signals. This way, we cannot communicate with each other worldwide as easily as it is now, and our society may be even silly.  Secondly, the discovery of satellite helps people to know more new facts about form and structure of the Earth. This knowledge is the base of many sciences and they help meteorologists to analyze the weather on a global scale because of satellite signals.

However, other people think that space exploration is useless as scientists should strive to ensure decent living conditions on Earth. 

I disagree with this view and I think that these people are selfish, because we are obligated to honor the discovering this area. You know, a lot of things, which we use every day, were invented thanks to space exploration.

All in all, people can estimate the impact of space exploration in different ways, but we must appreciate this area and continue developing it.

So, I agree with the point of view that we should investigate space. 

In my opinion space exploration is significant as it has provided people with an opportunity to launch satellites which help scientists explore space in new ways and ease the search for life in the universe. Moreover the invention of satellite helped scientists to know more about form and structure of the Earth. Satellites assist people in communicating with one another worldwide. Any mobile phone does not make any sense without satellite signals.

But there are some negative states of space exploration. For instance space exploration is very expensive and we should finance the road construction, conservation of nature, education instead of space exploration.  

However I cannot agree with this opinion because space exploration is not just a waste of money. We should invest in space exploration because it is closely related to everyday life : calls, TV, international communion.

To sum up I’d like to say that we should investigate space, because knowledge of space makes our life easier.

Personally I  think, that space exploration is a significant thing for us. Firstly,  we could not live our normal, modern life,  if we did not know about the space. Scientists launch satellites, which assist people in communicating with one another worldwide. Any mobile phone does not make any sense without satellite signals. So, the space  help us to contact with the outside world. Secondly, space exploration has alleviated weather forecast. In fact, satellites provide meteorologists with the ability to see the weather on a global scale. It means, that they can warn people of natural disasters and save their lifes.

On the other hand, space exploration is very expensive and has no positive impact on our society.  The money we spend to explore the space we would earmark for global problems like pollution, poverty, homelessness and etcetera.

However, I cannot agree with it, because it is worth it. In my opinion, even with space exploration we have enough money to solve this problems. Moreover, without it we would have more serious.

 

To conclude, the space exploration is very important for our planet and us at all.

I agree with the first people’s opinion. Firstly, special clothes can make people change their ordinary behavior. When we were children, we used to like wearing, for example, beautiful dresses and imagine that we were princesses. Besides, we started behaving ourselves kingly and quietly and remembered the best habits to show our “king roots”. Secondly, definite clothes let people be others, change social status. So, if a person wears a leather jacket and leather pants like usual biker’s clothes, this person will feel himself that he is brave and fearless, also he will want to do cool and dangerous things. 

On the other hand, clothes we are wearing are just clothes which help us feel warmth and protect our bodies from cold. Even though people are cheerful and easygoing, they usually wear dark clothes at home, because they can tidy up. People do it, though they are not shy, because they do not want to be filthy. 

I disagree with this opinion, because in many ways people will never wear bright and open clothes if they have complexes or they are close. People wear clothes which faces their character, this way they behave like that. 

All in all, people can choose who we are today, when they wear certain clothes. Be careful, because clothes influence our behavior.