Remake of IS BUSINESS BAD FOR SCIENCE? WHY? by Huran Mirillo https://padlet.com/mhuran/3ofcblxqazdz Made with an open mind en-us 2017-07-26 13:28:45 UTC 2017-07-26 13:32:50 UTC hello@padlet.com Commerce could make positive effects on scientific researches. https://padlet.com/mhuran/3ofcblxqazdz/wish/179497385 We recognize that commerce has good effects on researches. There are several reasons. Firstly , competitions between companies could boost the improvements of scientific researches. Also ,profits may motivate the scientists to do researches more enthusiastically. Secondly, results of researches in the fields of government or military aims such as space technology which can be used in air travel and radio technology which can be used in communication without the restrictions of distance.sometimes could make our life more convenient and safer.,]]> 2017-07-26 13:28:45 UTC https://padlet.com/mhuran/3ofcblxqazdz/wish/179497385 https://padlet.com/mhuran/3ofcblxqazdz/wish/179497386 Although business can cause some negative influence that might restrict the freedom of scentist and control direction of research in order to chase profits,
business is still more  beneficial to science more. There are some reasons as follows. Firstly, scientists can receive funding from companies. Then
 they can buy new equipments and recruit talents by this funding . Secondly, people can enjoy latest technological products because of business promotion. ]]> 2017-07-26 13:28:45 UTC https://padlet.com/mhuran/3ofcblxqazdz/wish/179497386 https://padlet.com/mhuran/3ofcblxqazdz/wish/179497387 In our group, someone thinks that business is beneficial for science, because scientists can raise money when they are selling technologies. After that, they can improve science and update facilities, using this money; therefore, they just need to focus on the research. Others  think that business is bad for science because some businessmen just focus on their science which can make a profit rather than real scientific results. `This is perhaps best illustrated by `sponsorship bias', where research generates results that suit the funder(The Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, p.921 as cited in Slaght and Pallant 2012).]]> 2017-07-26 13:28:45 UTC https://padlet.com/mhuran/3ofcblxqazdz/wish/179497387 conclusion:Business is bad or for science as scientists would be more focused on profits instead of pure science,and profit-based companies would undermine the quality and reliablity of research.Scientists would lose the opportunity to investgate what they like. https://padlet.com/mhuran/3ofcblxqazdz/wish/179497388 2017-07-26 13:28:45 UTC https://padlet.com/mhuran/3ofcblxqazdz/wish/179497388