<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title> Criteria for adjudication by LNET</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-08-12 09:02:48 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-11-16 20:13:54 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Criteria: Natalia Levy</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1848807024</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Organization and Clarity<br>2. Use of Facts/ Statistics<br>3. Use of Arguments<br>4. Rebuttal<br>5. Advanced Vocabulary<br>6. Style<br>7. Teamwork<br>8 Respect for the Other Team</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-27 16:25:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1848807024</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria</title>
         <author>easerpik</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1853486278</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Content (the most important part which includes relevancy and developing of the speech) - 40%</div><div>2. Fluency (for teachers the debate is a great vehicle to encourage fluent speaking in our classes) - 30%</div><div>3. Vocabulary (although students tend to simplify their speech, we have to encourage them to use more sophisticated words in their answers) - 30%</div><div>4. Teamwork (collaborative work is an extremely important skill that students have to have to succeed in their lives) - 20%</div><div>5. Performance (many students are very creative when they present and it should deserve some extra points) - 10%</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-29 08:29:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1853486278</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Speech Criteria [Judy Yakar Zwiebel]</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1855760651</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1.&nbsp; Content - clarity, is the goal clear, on task, based arguments, "clash", relates to audience 40%<br>2.&nbsp; Organization - is there structure, 3 point speech according to what was learned 30%<br>3.&nbsp; Fluency - does the speech flow, no reading 10%<br>4.&nbsp; Language - vocabulary and grammar 20%<br>5.&nbsp; Collaboration - 10%<br>6.  Performance - eye contact, engagement, body language - 10%</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-30 17:42:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1855760651</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Speech criteria: Milena Dubnikov</title>
         <author>dubnikov27</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1856219759</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1.Clarity<br>2.Organization<br>3.Vocabulary<br>4.Using of right arguments and examples<br>5.Body language and self-confidence</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-31 05:31:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1856219759</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria - Jana Harel</title>
         <author>jana_harel</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1858895736</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. The speech has a clear message and is structured with an introduction, main points (with examples), and a conclusion.<br>2. Evidence of research to back up ideas.<br>3. Respect for the rules of the debate<br>4. The student's voice is loud and clear enough to hear properly.<br>6. Eye contact (not for children on the spectrum) and body language to emphasis main points.<br>6. Fluency i.e. pace of delivery</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-01 14:19:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1858895736</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria for Assessment</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1861140994</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>1. content-all the content is pertinent to the topic and done clearly and organized<br>2. fluency very few breaks and speaks not too soft or loud<br>3/ good level of vocabulary&nbsp;<br>4. grammar is good(uses the basic teneses and higher structiures well)<br>5. eye contact and body language- shows self confidence and doesn't resort to looking at his notes too often</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-02 09:31:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1861140994</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria: Miriam Finerman</title>
         <author>miriamfinerman</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1861171974</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. The speech is well organized. It clarifies the class and brings at lease two arguments to support your claim.<br>2. In the speech at least two outside reliable sources are provided.<br>3. Respect is shown. Only one students talks at a time.<br>4. There will be a vote for which team won the debate. Winners get a 15 bonus.<br>5. Fluency.&nbsp;<br>6. Development of topic.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-02 09:50:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1861171974</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria - Ortal Doron</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1861255970</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1.&nbsp; &nbsp; Comprehensible speech - It is crucial that the students articulate their speech accurately for the students' basic understanding of the context. 40%</div><div>2.&nbsp; &nbsp; Logical and well-structured arguments, in order to convince the audience that there is a clear and relevant connection between each argument.30%</div><div>3.&nbsp; &nbsp; Reliable sources / data – to make a persuasive, professional argument. 20%</div><div>4.&nbsp; &nbsp; Number of breaks – A fluent speech with minimum pauses keeps the audience attentive. If it breaks a lot, the group will lose interest. 10%</div><div>5.&nbsp; &nbsp; Self-confidence through tone and body language – deeply affect the audience's reaction to the speech.10%</div><div>6.&nbsp; &nbsp; Cooperation between the group members – conveys a sense of healthy, collaborative and professional teamwork. 10%<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1544531586-fde5298cdd40?crop=entropy&amp;cs=srgb&amp;fm=jpg&amp;ixid=Mnw3ODI2fDB8MXxzZWFyY2h8Mnx8ZGViYXRlfGVufDB8fHx8MTYzNTc2NDYzOQ&amp;ixlib=rb-1.2.1&amp;q=85" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-02 10:40:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1861255970</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria - Sharona</title>
         <author>realisharona</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1864769312</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Organization of the speech (because this makes the difference between the audience understanding the message or not). <strong>50%</strong><br>2. Use of the three persuasive appeals (ethos-logos-pathos), because individuals in the audience differ in their receptiveness to different approaches. <strong>20%</strong><br>3. Diction. Accent is not important, but enunciating words so that the audience can understand is crucial. This is a challenge for students, so I'll give it <strong>30%</strong> (but in my heart I believe it's 50%).&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-03 14:11:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1864769312</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria - Anu Abu Rahal</title>
         <author>anukka055</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1865137154</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Strength of the argument: clear, persuasive and relevant. This is the basis of the entire debate. <strong>40%</strong><br>2. Clarity. Speech is given in a clearly audible voice and can be understood without difficulty. <strong>20%</strong><br>3. Organization. The speech is well organized and logical to follow.<strong> 20%</strong><br>4. Cooperation. The entire team should work together. <strong>10%</strong><br>5. Language (vocabulary, grammar, fluency): A means to deliver the message effectively. <strong>10%</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-03 15:54:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1865137154</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria: Efrat Mor</title>
         <author>1002125012</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1870086817</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1.&nbsp;Content -50%- would be most important because it's the foundation for the whole debate. &nbsp;</div><div>2. Clarity -20%- is also important because if the speech is hard to follow that it defeats the purpose.&nbsp;</div><div>3. Teamwork - 20%- just because I'd want to reinforce the importance of group work<br>4.&nbsp; Body Language - 10%- I would assume that in public debates, the speaker's body language is crucial<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-05 14:22:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1870086817</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria - Rivka Gordon</title>
         <author>rivkagordon</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1874644568</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Content and Organization - The speech is on topic and well organised, with a clear opinion statement, supporting arguments, and conclusion. (50%)<br>2. Language accuracy - the speech is grammaticaly accurate with correct sentence structure. (20%)<br>3. Vocabulary - Rich and varied vocabulary is used. (10%)<br>4. Fluency - The speech is clearly spoken at an appropriate pace. (10%)<br>5. Audience interaction - The presenter smiles and makes eye contact with the audience. (10%)<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-08 09:58:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1874644568</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1874686895</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Fluency<br>Knowledge on the subject/preparation<br>Usage of debating tools<br>Respect<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-08 10:21:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1874686895</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria for judging a speech-Shosh</title>
         <author>sho_nah</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1877821531</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Topic development, argumentation&amp; organization 45%, easy to follow and coherent<br><br>2. Style, tone, pace,&nbsp; flow, volume 20%, clarity<br><br>3. Varied and rich vocabulary 20%<br><br>4.Use of 3 persuasive appelas 15%<br><br>5. Language skills 10%<br><br>The most important element or component in a soeech is organization and what you have to say, your arguments. This comes first. Following in&nbsp; scale of importance is the&nbsp; the voice &nbsp; component that includes many important elements/ I would like to relate to the fact that i placed language skills the last because&nbsp; in the Dbate aspect, content and all other elements come first.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-09 10:15:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1877821531</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria- Amit Gafny</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1878743291</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Background knowledge regarding the topic.<br>2. Fluency- Minimum pauses will show confidence<br>3. Use facts and scientific research that supports the idea.<br>4.Language skills.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-09 16:04:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1878743291</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria: Laura Rudich</title>
         <author>laura_schuller</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1878915020</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Content - is the content relevant 50%<br>2. Vocabulary and grammar - did the student use the proper vocab for the task and used the proper grammar o express his opinion 20%<br>3. Clarity - was the main message delivered properly 20%<br>4. Organization - was the message organized in the manner we expect - 10%</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-09 17:02:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1878915020</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jane Cohen</title>
         <author>englishwithjane</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1878927993</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li>Organization and clarity - main arguments and rebuttal are outlined clearly. 30%</li><li>Arguments are clear and have grounds to support them. 20%</li><li>Rebuttal is substantiated&nbsp; and supported with evidence. 15%</li><li>Language is in the appropriate register. /sign post language is used. Fluency is evident. 15%</li><li>Presentation - style, intonation, body language and eye contact are all evident. 20%</li></ol><div><br></div><div><br>Presentation - style, intonation, body language and eye contact are all evident. 30%</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-09 17:06:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1878927993</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Masha Fooksman</title>
         <author>mashacourses</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1879442676</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Content and Organization.&nbsp; 30%<br>2. Clarity (clear arguments, good supporting items) 20%<br>3. Presentation&nbsp; - 30%<br>4. Language  - 20%</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-09 20:39:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1879442676</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria for Judging Debate: Baruch Gotfried.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1888479096</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li>Relevance - Did the speaker choose the appropriate clash points, arguments and rebuttals?&nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;40%</strong></li><li>Clarity - Did the speaker clarify his/her point? Was it clear what he/she was trying to say?&nbsp; &nbsp; <strong>20%</strong></li><li>Language Proficiency - Was the level of English sufficient? Were there any grammar errors or usage of unsuitable words?&nbsp; &nbsp; <strong>20%&nbsp;</strong></li><li>Performance - Body language and tone of voice. Did the speaker seem confident?&nbsp; &nbsp; <strong>20%</strong> &nbsp;</li></ol><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-13 18:57:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1888479096</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Monica Nemirovsky</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1894986039</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Clash and engagement- what is the main point or points of the discussion and how important or relevant are they?- 40%<br>2. Clarity- How clear are the arguments presented? Can I fully understand what you are saying and what you mean?- 30%<br>3. Fluency- There are no pauses, speech is flowing- 20%<br>4. Style- what is the tone? Is there eye-contact with the audience or with the other team? Does the speaker use body language/ hands? Does he speak fast or at a normal pace? Does he stand and speak with confidence?- 10%</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-16 19:10:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1894986039</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria for Judging a debate Sara Fried </title>
         <author>sara_fried1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1920073561</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><br>content of speech ( relevance to the topic, clearly understood, arguments well organized) 40%<br>2. fluency- very few pauses while speaking, didn't get stuck looking for a word or two 20%<br>3. Language proficiency: good grammar and vocabulary , very few if any mistakes with the basic tenses. 20%<br>4. Performance(body language and eye contact with the audience): speech is said animatedly ( not too animatedly) shows enthusiasm and looks at the audience but not staring. shows confidence. 20%</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 10:42:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1920073561</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criteria for judging a speech - Aliza Zur Masturov</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1929933129</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. speakers chose appropriate clash/point and arguments - 30%<br>2. speakers have grounds for rebuttal<br>- 20%<br>3. language - speakers use correct grammatical structures - 20%<br>4. vocabulary - speakers use rich vocabulary - 20%<br>5. fluency - speakers have no or a very few pauses or hesitations - 20%<br>6. performance- body language and eye contact with audience and other students/team - 20%</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.unlv.edu/sites/default/files/articles/main-images/NC_debate.JPG" />
         <pubDate>2021-12-05 21:44:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1929933129</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alina Borisov-Rebel</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1933014254</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Content -- the speech should be clear, relevant and well-organized (50%).<br>2. Persuasive arguments, clash, background (30%)<br>3. Language (it should be fluent, clear and with appropriate vocabulary). (20%).</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-12-07 08:30:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1933014254</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>SHIR KATZMAN</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1937883506</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>How do you analyze a speaker?</div><div><strong>The Most Important Thing to Analyze: The Speech Objectives</strong></div><ol><li>What is the speaker's goal? Is it to educate, to motivate, to persuade, or to entertain?</li><li>What is the primary message being delivered?</li><li>Why is this person delivering this speech? Are they the right person?</li><li>Was the objective achieved?</li></ol>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-12-09 10:43:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/1937883506</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>criteria- Ofira Cohen</title>
         <author>ofirachai</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/2398970341</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>content and organization- 50%<br>The speeech is on topic, with clear claims and arguments. The stages are clear and the there is a manner of order in the structure of the speech.&nbsp;<br>Vocabulary 20% - rich and varied voc especially the use of connectors that can help being more prusuasive.&nbsp;<br>Lang- 10%&nbsp;<br>Short and clear sentences. One main tense&nbsp;<br>Fluency- 20%&nbsp;<br>The speaker is very fluent and can be very focued and clear, he doesn not afraid of making mustakes in English and speaks nicely. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-11-27 10:21:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lnlearnonet/3llfujw1n9qr0hac/wish/2398970341</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
